In Nathaniel Hawthorne’s The Scarlet Letter, the common punishment for a range of crimes is shame, inflicted by forcing the “criminal” onto the town scaffold and having them face the judging stares of the whole town. Shame is a feeling of self loathing, in a way, and makes one feel like a bad person, when truly, most of the time, they’ve only done a bad deed. This often leaves the shamed feeling hopeless, especially if their actions ruined their reputation. Today, judges are beginning to sentence minor criminals to shame punishments instead of jail time. While some may argue that shame is a cheaper and simpler alternative to jail time, it doesn’t have the intended effects on the criminal, but instead have terrible, unpredicted effects.
A major argument for supporters of shaming is that shaming is extremely fiscally
…show more content…
However, this argument is completely false and unreasonable. When a person is made to feel shame by a judge, jury, or any other authority figure, the true effect is resentment of authority, possibly leading to further disobedience of laws. For example, when a person is a convicted sex offender and moves into a new community, they, by law, have to personally go door to door, introducing themselves to their new neighbors as a sex offender. Having to repeatedly go through saying such a thing and dealing with whatever reaction is given certainly has strong effects of shame. With each horrified look and each terrible first impression, especially if the crime was much more minor than most people would assume, the offender would feel more shame, but also more and more hate for the authority that requires them to have to go through such a shameful and likely ostracizing experience. As that hate grows, the likeliness for disobedience of law increases, the opposite of the intended
Unlike today, the 18th and 19th century consisted of public shaming which served as an effective punishment due to the lack of long distance communication. However, today in the 21st century, with the implication on long term communication, public shaming is easily broadcasted to many more people than just the local community. Public Shaming began “to fall out of favor in part because America was becoming more populous and Impersonal”(Beato). Public shaming includes many inconsistencies with the severity of the punishment. For instance, when two of the same pictures appeared on the internet, only one picture became famous while the other picture went almost unnoticed.
Recently, courts and judges have used public humiliation to prevent repeated offenses by the violator and discourage others from repeating the offense. This is an effective punishment in today 's society because the punishment prevents the offender from repeating the offense in fear of being jailed. One judge sentenced a man who crashed his car into someone else while drunk driving to stand outside of the crash site every Saturday from 9 a.m to 5 p.m with a sign admitting his guilt (foxnews). This is an effective ways for judges to handle a problem because it insures justice without the jailing, and is a constant reminder of the man and other drunk drivers that drunk driving kills. Jon Wisser, a Texas judge, believes that any public humiliation
Rios’ findings indicate a daily, institutionalized practice of “punitive social control” aimed at “regulating deviant behavior and maintaining social order” (21). For example, because of his intimidating appearance, Tyrell was stopped all the time and checked for guns and drugs beginning at the age of 12 (42). Eventually, Tyrell began to accept this stigmatization and chose to conform to the suspicions he was constantly accused of. In response to negative behaviors, punishment was utilized as a means of controlling their behavior. Punishment was described as the process by which individuals came to feel stigmatized, outcast, shamed, defeated, or hopeless as the result of negative interactions and sanctions imposed by individuals who represent institutions of social control.
In The Scarlet Letter, Nathaniel Hawthorne goes against the ideals of the Puritan community by using topics, such as: adultery, hypocrisy, and revenge. Hawthorne uses Hester’s life and the people in her life to showcase each of these subjects and how much they can affect someone’s life. First, Hawthorne goes against the community by using the scandal between Hester and Dimmesdale and their adultery in order to challenge their Puritan way of life. “‘I fear! I fear!
The Crucible by Arthur Miller and Scarlet Letter by Nathaniel Hawthorne are two stories that are based on mass hysteria and public shaming. Both stories and their topics are what helped to shape America’s early identity. In The Crucible, the townsfolk accept and become active in the hysterical climate not only out of genuine religious piety but also because it gives them a chance to express repressed sentiments and to act on long-held grudges”. This shows that there is mass hysteria in the story based on the quotation and its explain why people have mass hysteria or why they do it. A group of teenage girls is discovered dancing naked in the woods by the town minister.
I believe that all of us at some point doing wrongful behavior and breaking rules such as jaywalking. When reading this, I realize that I also use at least one of the techniques of neutralization to make me feel less guilty when doing any wrongful behavior. Besides, it makes me understand the usage of techniques of neutralization and realize on how important it is to take responsibility for our acts. I agree with the author’s conclusion that the continued use of neutralization and rationalization might weaken social bonds and reduce their need to use the techniques, over time. I think the more time you engage in doing deviant acts, the more ‘experienced’ you are, so you may received the label as deviant and because of that, you may not worried about what other people think about you anymore.
The Reality of Shame Shame is a self-conscious emotion that arises from the perception that one has done something dishonorable or something is wrong about oneself. In the Scarlet Letter and The Price of Shame, Nathaniel Hawthorne and Monica Lewinsky depict the effects of shame and public embarrassment on the mortified victim and humanity as a whole. Their arguments project various themes such as humanity thriving on public humiliation, people deserving redemption, being upstanders and not bystanders, and labeling shame victims with objects.
This leads citizens to think about how to cut costs. When there are less people locked away, earning little or no money, Americans pay to feed, clothe, and house them. In his essay “Shame is Worth a Try,” author Dan Kahan states that “what the shame proponents seem to be getting, and the critics ignoring, is the potential of shame as an effective, cheap, and humane alternative” (Rosa and Eschholz 582). Even June Tangney, an author and opponent of public shaming,
In the book “The Things They Carried” two stories show that shame is a strong feeling that human beings experienced and can make humans do things that they wouldn’t do. In the story "On The Rainy River '' By Tim O’Brien the example below shows what the feeling of shame can do mentally to a person “my conscience told me to run, but some irrational and powerful force was resisting, like a weight pushing me toward the war. What it came down to, stupidly, was a sense of shame.
Should Public Humiliation Be Used As A Punishment For Crime? In The Scarlet Letter, Nathaniel Hawthorne uses public humiliation to shame a puritan women named Hester Prynne for her sin of adultery. To punish her for her sin, the puritan officials of the community force her to wear a scarlet letter “A” upon her chest to publicly shame her and so that everyone in the community can mock her for her sin. Public humiliation is still used by people and by the government in some ways as a punishment.
It’s funny to think that shame could be a worse punishment than death or prison, but it’s quite true. Our nation is over 200 years old and we are heavily influenced by those who originally came to the new world, the Puritans. Puritan society was the foundation for many things, punishment being no exception and shame as a method of it included. Through the analyzation of literature and media, we can see just how much the Puritans influenced and continues to influence our modern day society.
It’s ironic that even though we can end our misery by just speaking up or confession our crimes, we chose to be silent. This truly represents how important society is for us. One mistake -all the respect you earned, good deeds you did- goes out of the window. That is how people are viewed. Rather than looking at the hundred-good deeds, people keep fixating on a single wrong doing.
In Dan Kahan’s, Shame is Worth a Try, he claims that the use of shame as punishment is a more effective and economical alternative to imprisonment. Kahan uses a plethora of rhetorical devices in his article. He uses many examples of places in which shame is already being used as a punishment. In the first paragraph, Kahan states that “Nevertheless, courts and legislators have registered have resisted alternative sanctions-not so much because they wont work, but because they fail to express appropriate moral condemnation of crime”.
Re-integrative shaming is the disapproval of the deviant act without condemning the offender. In this way, the offender is not stigmatized and efforts are made to forgive and welcome the person back into the community. This process has been demonstrated to work well in Africa, and perhaps, at a more personal level, between many American parents and their children (Braithwaite, 2000). Re-integrative shaming has been shown to reduce
As people became more individualized however beliefs and values would shift so the law needed to reflect the ideals and values of the society. Within David Garland’s chapter on punishment and social solidarity he recognises that punishment is not necessarily in place to correct behaviour but to keep society as a whole. While there is a correlation between punishment and criminal activity to keep society intact there has to be in a place a set of values within the legal system that force a kind of communality. People who enter the prison system are made examples of representing what a society values. It can be a person being imprisoned for life due to murder or for thievery within each society there are consequences for deviating from values.