According to the New York Times, 486 people have died from mass shootings since 2000. Most of time, the shooting ends before police can even make it to the scene. The amount of shootings have increased in the past seven years. The United States has been trying to find ways to prevent school shootings since the massacre at Sandy Hook elementary.
Mikayla Evans 8th Grade English Mrs. King April 26, 2016 Seatbelts on School Busses Seatbelts should be required on school busses. Seatbelts protect the lives of children by keeping them safe during bus crashes, also they help with the overall behavior on school busses. Seatbelts should be required and worn on school busses. One reason seatbelts should be required on school busses is because of the safety of the students during a bus crash or or accident.
There Are Criminal Punishments For First Offenses: Through there is no mandatory minimum jail sentence, DWI and DUI charges have criminal consequences as well. For instance, if a driver was transporting a minor at the time of the arrest, jail time will likely be imposed (ranging from two months to two years, depending on the severity of the charge and the driver 's BAC). Fines of up to $500 for first time DWIs and up to $1000 for first time DUIs will be instituted; these fines will go up if a minor was present during the incident. Your DUI/traffic lawyer at the Law Offices of Max D. Miller, P.A., will help you make sense of the charges you 're facing. Call the Law Offices of Max D. Miller, P.A., at (410) 838-1165 to schedule a DUI/traffic consultation with Attorney Miller today.
Not having seat belts on school buses is another example of something that is legal but should not be. Schools have small children on buses and can be just as dangerous as a small car. Buses can easily tip over when the driver is going to fast or turning too sharply and the bus could tip over and cause harm to the children. Buses can easily wreck like any other car and need to have more safety regulations. Smoking around children is something else that is not necessarily unconstitutional but it is wrong.
The author addressed a thirteen year old girl named Cari Lightner was walking to a carnival when she was struck and hit by a hit-and-run drunk driver and killed instantly. The author also talks about binge drinking and how if the legal drinking age is lowered, Americans would stop binge drinking;therefore, the conclusion is incorrect. She states that alcohol should be forbidden until 18-to 20 year olds precisely because they have a tendency to binge drink whether it is legal or illegal,and how college students get into a great deal of trouble due to binge drinking. Students endanger themselves and others. They sometimes even kill students.
When there is a horrible instance like a shooting where a large number of people are killed their is a large amount of national attention where the government looks into how to treat these issues and possibly prevent future ones but shortly after the emotion and attention goes away so does the actions to prevent such events from taking place (Price 2). Kids now instead of solving their problems by duking it out in the backyard they are turning to more violent measures. Some of these measures are knives baseball bats boots and sometimes even guns. Instead of worrying so much about guns and how to ban them why does the government not spend more time supporting a mandatory enforced daily
Unfortunately, I crashed into two cars in front of me and my car was damaged a lot, but Luckily no one got hurt. From that collision I started to leave my phone in the back or in a spot that I can’t reach while driving. Not all countries have banned using cell phones in the vehicle. The banning will only decrease collisions and not stop collision once and for all. People are still going to get away with using the cell phone and driving.
They started a boycott team which was led by Rosa Parks and Martin Luther King Jr., and many other people joined. The Supreme Court had to ratify the law because African Americans rode the bus a lot which made the bus business fail when they stopped riding. Everyday blacks rode bikes or walked. Gideon v. Wainwright- Gideon was a kid that ran away from home when he was in middle school.
Martin Luther King Jr. did achieve success using civil disobedience. They removed the segregated public transportation law allowing anyone to sit anywhere. By 1960, King was getting national notoriety. King took seventy five students into a local store and asked for counter service but was denied. King refused to leave and they arrested him and 36 other people.
“When the most innocent, elementary school children, are the victims it feels even more tragic” (Koone, 2014, p. 165). During the year 1994 an act was passed. The act was known as the Gun free school act. This act imposed that a federal requirement for one year; stating expulsion from school.
• P alleges assault and false arrest. P alleges that he is a MTA driver and he was operating his bus down Lexington Avenue. P alleges that MOS had stopped all traffic at 42 Street and Lexington Avenue causing his bus to stop. P alleges that while inside the bus he attempted to ask MOS why traffic was stopped, MOS Kane approached the bus and began to yell at P. P states that he waited 15 minutes then exited the bus and approached MOS Kane’s marked vehicle. P states that he began to write down MOS Kane’s vehicle number, which he needed to fill out a report for his MTA supervisors to explain the delay.
You may also be required to install an ignition interlock device in your vehicle. Even with your first DWI offense, you will face stiffer fines if there is a child under 15 in your vehicle. You will be fined up to $10,000 and face up to two years of jail time. Of course, if your actions driving while intoxicated result in serious injury or death, you will face far stiffer penalties.
Should Candy & Soda be Banned From School? J. Justin Wilson effectively uses rhetorical techniques in his short article, arguing about whether or not candy and soda should be banned from schools. Mr. Wilson was dominant in appealing to logic reason to support his argument. His ideology is that the government needn’t intervene in the lives of young adults by eliminating fat foods from school, paying particular attention on candy and soda. He states, “when faced with a problem as complicated as our nation 's childhood obesity epidemic, it 's easier to simply assign blame to sugary drinks and snacks, rather than tackling the various roots of the problem” (Wilson, para 5).
Officers can conduct roadblocks to find drunk drivers without a warrant as long as individual automobiles are not signaled out. Be as it may, in the case of 2000 Indianapolis V Edmond that officers of the law can not conduct roadblocks to look for drug use because the roadblock does not encourage public safety. The Warrant Clause describes how police obtain warrants. The warrants must be specific describing where will be searched and what or who will be apprehended. Probable cause and or evidence must be present to obtain a warrant.
I. Issue: Morse vs. Frederick, 2002; Frederick, a high school senior, hung a banner saying: “Bong Hits 4 Jesus” at a school supervised activity. Morse, the principal, suspended him for 10 days saying the banner promoted illegal drug use to those attending the school supervised activity. Frederick sued Morse saying his First Amendment rights were violated. Issue: Does the First Amendment allow public school to prohibit students from displaying banners with messages promoting use of illegal drugs at school supervised activities? II.