By changing to a more healthier menu, that will contain mainly of wheat bread, the student will no longer smell fresh baked yeast rolls that comes right out of the oven at lunch time. School lunches are sometimes the only lunch students get a day. Some families may not be able to afford food for their house, and therefore some children may only eat at school. These students will have less food on their trays because of the new regulations will not allow them to be able to get the food they most rightly need to get through the day. Those students who can barley afford a meal at school will be devastated by the new price increase because of the new, healthier food. School lunches used to be the be delectable and very appetizing, by changing the menu, the menu will change dramaticly in flavor. Some new item to the menu may look unappetizing and not look eatable. Most students will mostly likely skip lunch because of the change. Students will no longer be able to have the most need nutrients through out the day. Most student athletes have a very busy schedule and only have time to eat lunch at school. They will no longer get the protein that they need to finish the day, and make
In my opinion, making the school's lunch menu healthier is a bad idea. One reason is that making the menu healthier is not serving a purpose. A second reason is kids can always bring their own lunch to school. A third reason is that making the lunch healthy is not going to make the child have a healthy lifestyle. Although, others may disagree and say that having a healthier lunch menu is a good idea. In one's opinion, they can say that making the school's lunch menu healthier is a good idea. They could say that this is a good idea because kids would be eating healthy at school and home. Some may think that this a good idea because it is a way that is helping lower the obesity rate in kids. Others may think that making the lunch menu healthier
Look back at what you ate at school and ask yourself if it is healthy. Is there healthy alternatives to school lunch? Is there a variety of choices to choose from? Are there any vegetarian choices for the students? These are just some of the basic questions you would ask yourself when thinking about the risks of school lunches. I strongly believe that the cafeteria menus should be changed in order to have a fair and much healthier lunch. Money may be an issue but there are plenty of ways to solve this world wide problem in the schools. Before there wasn't as much diversity and most people would have agreed to choose from two options what to eat. Now there are vegans, vegetarians, and plenty of allergies that could cause problems for someone
explore evident challenges that NSLP presents for food service staff in schools in Indiana. The article helps to express a range of reactions to the new regulations placed by NSLP in 2012. While the rising costs of maintaining fresh food options appears to be a unanimous challenge amongst schools in our nation, the results exhibit a variety of ways to ac-tively combat that challenge. The authors help the audience to think empathically by represent-ing comprehensive concerns from food service workers nationwide adjusting to the new guide-lines. This pathos appeal would strengthen the impact of my argument during the research pa-per. Using direct quotes from active food service employees effectively bring the pathos appeal full circle because it helps the reader to consider perspectives that aren’t their own. So it’s a little sneaky in it’s logic. The audience is forced to consider multiple solutions that could contribute to eating healthier without the fear of resisting current trends. Uncomplicated language and basic tables help to make this article universally applicable to readers who are not a part of the intend-ed
This will take a long time because they have to have something to do with the food that they are getting rid of. If they don't have somewhere to send it then they will be wasting money by throwing it out. The cost comes into play because the schools will be paying money to get the new healthier foods into their cafeteria. The money will come back when students start buying the new food, but the school will be down quite a bit of money for a little while.
Imagine going to school and thinking, oh boy what am I going to have for lunch today? And all of the sudden you see something you don’t like, so you don’t eat it and then your stomach starts to growl. What would you do for lunch and how would you explain it to your parents after school? Students have been known to not eat lunch at school very often because, for the main reason, they don’t like it. Others say that they “aren’t hungry”, but you never know. Schools should just make the lunch more healthy and taste better. Even though school lunches could potentially make students sick and not feel good, some students say it is disgusting and causes them not to eat and complain because they’re not getting
Over the years the school lunches in america has changed drastically.15 to 20 percent of the products in the program are purchased by the USDA.The school lunch system in America has changed over the years in many ways. The school lunch program started when Harry S. Truman in 1946 was president as a way to help every child have a very nutritious lunch while in school. Studies showed that people believe that if they had the energy they needed to get them through the day it most likely would have came from a nutritional lunch. Over the years people were concerned about the amount of fat the school lunches and breakfasts were providing for the children. Many children have unhealthy eating habits through the high fat pizzas, burgers, and French
Their are students that don't eat anything until they get to school. And they do not want to eat vegetables and fruits and that is it. then you will have students that will not even buy a lunch at all because there is nothing that they like, because it is all healthy food. Kids already complain about how they took all of the good food out of our schools, and you want to make it all healthy? A lunch can only be so healthy before you do not get all of the ingredients your body needs to survive. Another example is, if you change the students school lunch, and make it healthier you should do that to the teachers as well. Students do not like new changes just as much as teachers don't. The school will have a big drop in money because the students will eventually stop buying the school lunches, because they do not like what they are eating and paying for. I also believe that we should be able to pick and choose what we like to eat or what we want to eat because we are paying for the meal. Its not fair to the students to pay for food that they personally do not want to eat or buy. Some kids don't have the money to be able to pack their lunches or go and buy fast food for lunch, so they haft to eat school lunch. and they do not want to just eat fruits and
“Who decides what you eat, you, I think so but it turns out; no,” quips John Stossel (“Food Police”). WE may think that we decide what we eat, but in actuality the government is deciding what people can and cannot eat. ome food laws in the United States do not work, are inconsistent, and invade on individuality; the amount of regulation should be changed so Americans do not have their government deciding what they can and cannot eat.
In some schools some principals superintendents have made a decision to opt out of the Healthy choice foods and make there own semi-healthy foods that kids like. To reduce waste and bring back students who have opted to pack a lunch or go off campus for fast food, his districts cafeterias have installed stir-fry stations with abundant vegetables so students can have meals made to order. and he’s added spice bars so kids can even the bland. In schools some principals and administrators are starting to take action. They want students to eat healthy but at the same time eat what they like. when students go off campus researchers say they gain more weight then when they eat the food they like at school, healthy or not. If it’s not the healthiest food in the world then the lunches service can put less on the kids plate. Kids will eat more at school if the school sells what the kids like. FInally the school noticed it and finally started selly stir-fry stations. thus Principal and administrators finally noticed that kids hate their food and want the food that they will eat and not throw
Lunch is a time where for thirty minutes everyone settles down to eat and laugh with their friends In many high schools, such as Mountain Pointe High School, there are two lunches to accommodate the student body because one lunch would be too crowded and large. There is first lunch, which is also called fourth lunch because it occurs after third period and then there is second lunch, also called fifth lunch because it is after fourth period. Both lunches have their benefits, but the ones from first lunch can have a tremendous impact. In general, the effects of first lunch instead of second can greatly improve the quality of life for a student.
By not spending more money on healthier food the school could spend the money on new textbooks or even tablets for students that will better their education and most likely higher grades. Consequently brightening the future and opening new doors for the students that they most likely would not have been achievable without the better education and higher grades. Another important factor that needs to be accounted for is the school environment and the mood of the school. By taking away students favorite foods it may have a very negative affect on the school. One negative affect is that students may decide to not go to school as much due to the lack of appetizing lunches being served, which may lead to all sorts of negative affects. Another negative effect is test scores and grades may drop because the student is not as focused because they have not had anything to eat and are much more worried about eating than paying attention in class. The mood of the school might also be more negative. If students are happy and feel they are treated fairly they will show more school spirit and all around be a much happier learning environment. Last but not least the fairness to all students especially ones that only meal they get to eat each day is the one they
In the article, “Are Our School Lunches Healthy Enough?” by Rice William, the author question whether our school lunches are healthy enough. He discusses the Hunger-Free Kids Act, a campaign originated from first lady, Michelle Obama, in 2010 to help fight childhood obesity, which affects 1 in 3 Americans . It can escalate into diabetes and heart disease, which can make a childs life worse and cost the nation millions. Sure it might be a hassle to get kids to eat healthier school lunches, but is it worth it in the long run.
The reasons we should have open lunch is because the lunchroom would be less crowded we could have one lunch period for all students, the kids are cooped up in classrooms for seven hours a day so it would give them a chance to get out for a little, and the final reason is that it gives kids a chance to have and learn about responsibilities. School lunch may not seem like a big deal, but for high school kids lunch could make or break their day.
If we made the school lunches healthier there would be more active kids during recess, and gym. If we keep they lunches we have today there would be so many kids sitting out on so many fun activities and there would be kid sitting on the benches at recess just watching all of the other kids have fun and running around and the kid that is sitting on the bench can’t even run or play tag like the other kids. The other kids that are are having fun are most likely to be making fun the obese kid or gossiping about how he looks. At gym class the gym teacher probably gets so upset when a obese kid can’t play because he/she can’t even move or run for one game. I am sure that our gym teachers love to see us participate in all of their activities that they come up with for us. I am sure that it would make them feel