A growing debate in the National Collegiate Athletic Association is whether or not student athletes should be paid. The controversy began in 2011 after three hundred coaches and athletes signed a petition to pay college-level athletes, and since then other athletes have made several more arguments. The NCAA has rightfully denied all of the requests, saying they include too much. To pay student athletes could be hugely expensive for colleges, especially because they would not only pay for each athlete’s degree and equipment, but also provide a salary and give bonuses revenue for tournaments. Moreover, college athletes should not be paid because there is not enough money, it takes away a student’s focus from schoolwork, and not every athlete is guaranteed a professional career after graduating; however it is argued that it they are already paid in a way. …show more content…
Villanova University has twenty-two sports teams, and according to a study done by the National College Players Association, each athlete could make up to $500,000 a year. These teams vary in size and there could be dozens of athletes on just one team. To put this into perspective, Villanova could easily pay millions of extra dollars for each team just to fund their athletes. On top of that, Villanova’s financial assistance office reports that the school offers about 160 million dollars in scholarships and grants every year, excluding all loans. College budgets are tight, and any extra expenses, like paying athletes, may cause them to offer less scholarships. This would be not fair to hard-working students who cannot afford college and rely on scholarships and aid. Unfortunately, athletes focus more on performance than on academics, and scholarship money may go to
Click here to unlock this and over one million essaysShow More
College athletes have been huge in America since the early 1900s. With the emergence of social media the prevalence of college sports have increased further. There have been numerous scandals across college sports for athletes taking money for signing objects. This brings up the highly controversial debate over whether or not these athletes should be paid. Tyson Harnett addresses this topic in “Why college Athletes Should Be Paid<” when he takes a side and provides examples as a former collegiate athlete.
Not all athletes receive full rides or any scholarships at all yet, they still spend as much time and put as much effort into the sport just as someone who has had one received. The NCAA league makes a reportedly $11+ billion a year. None of which goes to any athlete. Paying the athlete could make the sport more competitive and appealing to one 's eye.
College athletes should not be paid and already receive enough compensation. College athletes can receive scholarships that pay for their tuition, fees, and other costs of college, these scholarships enable student athletes to pursue a college education without having to worry about paying for it. These scholarships can be seen as a form of compensation. “Student-athletes benefit much more by being eligible for scholarships and stipends rather than taxable, yearly incomes” (Bertolas 6). The author states that college athletes benefit far more with scholarships and stipends than a salary anyway.
Major college football and basketball programs bring in millions of dollars a year for their university and the NCAA. Many people claim the players are the reason these programs make so much money and should be compensated for their work. At first this seems to be logical, but there are many flaws with paying athletes. However, athletes should be able to pursue business opportunities. College athletes should not be paid for playing sports, but should be able to have an outside income.
Enough money to get by, not struggle on campus, and plenty to hold them over on breaks when school cafes are closed while they are still working on their sport would be more beneficial than what they are receiving now, which is nothing. Colleges need to start reimbursing their athletes for the x amount of money that they make off of their athletic abilities but also they need to do so legally. Hopefully, the legality of paying athletes will be overturned before more athletes leave their colleges ahead of graduation in a search for money since they are not receiving any to stay afloat in school. According to the rules of the NCAA, any athlete that receives any payment for playing will lose his or her eligibility to play. Making it impossible to legally receive any financial boost and refusing payment, the NCAA has created quite a maneuver to get away from paying college
Will Davidson ENGL 1120 11/16/17 Major Paper III College athletics is a defining activity in American culture. Whether it is during the brisk Saturdays of fall watching the gridiron, or during the spring where the best in basketball compete for the title of the best, College Athletics is iconic for our nation. They provide relief from daily life, something to look forward to, and serve as a gathering point for friends and family to enjoy each-others company. With all college sports give back to the people, many have wondered if the athletes which make it all possible should be paid. Some argue that college athletes should remain amateurs, as that makes the unique spirit of the game different than the current pro leagues.
This leaves most of the college athletes on the verge of poverty and some have even reached poverty. Scholarships have been a sort of pay for play for years for these athletes, so that other payment was avoided. This is totally unfair to these players. While the coaches are receiving millions and experiencing nothing but luxury, along with other staff in athletics, the athletes are receiving scholarships as a form of trade. That cannot even be comparable and simply
Think about it wouldn 't that be great in college while being able to graduate college debt-free? Well that is what college athletes get,so i don 't think is fair for them to get paid. College athletes should not be paid because they were the ones that signed up to be college athletes. College athletes have a responsibility to represent their college. Which is why college is a place to get degrees not money.
College sports is one of the best-known entertainments around the world. But for the athletes, they are students first then athletes second. For college student-athletes, there are a variety of scholarships and grants to help pay for college or college debt. However, some critics say that student-athletes should be paid a salary like pro athletes would, with help from scholarships or grants. The authors of, College Athletes are being Educated, not Exploited, Val Ackerman and Larry Scott, argue that student-athletes are already paid by free education and other necessities.
If colleges began to pay their athletes, then they could build a bad reputation for being mercenary and lose their educational reputation If they are allowed to play, then it can be financially detrimental to the college because there are many flaws in the system. College athletes should not be compensated for their actions regarding athletic activities, no matter what sport or level they compete on. The idea that college athletes should or shouldn 't be paid
A big issue in college sports is whether or not to pay the athletes that participate in the sporting programs. My side would be with people who think that the players should not get paid. I believe that it would affect their in game performance all together. Even if they did get paid I think most athletes would spend their money on things that would overall get them in trouble. I also think the free scholarship most get is the same as getting paid only they cannot spend their money on what they want.
College athletes deserve to be paid for their dedication to sports. There has been huge controversy over this and it is considered to be one of the most debatable topics in sports. Inequality in sports has been shown in many ways. This includes women inequity, racial inequality, and coaches being paid more depending on what sport they coach. College athletes should be compensated for their work and be given rights.
Most athletes are not on full scholarship, which means that they do not get their education 100% for free. Even if some athletes do get any level of scholarship, it is only free for so long. If an athlete does not perform at a high level or if they get hurt, they can easily have that scholarship taken away, and they are left with nothing. These student athletes are supposedly “amateurs” and blessed with “free education,” but in reality, this is not the case. Student athletes should definitely be compensated and recognized for their efforts.