Also, with these taxes the obesity in general will be reduced, due to the increase in price the consumption of sweetened drinks will be decrease. School lunch should be an area of focus for schools, its is a fundamental base to make it a better school. Unhealthy food does nothing but harm the students who consume it, as well as the school that provides it. If students eat healthy they will have a better, healthier life when the grow up. When students eat healthy there will be a better academic performance in the school and the data shown
Furthermore, taxes on the unhealthy foods is a way to develop the government financial growth. As a study of food prices and consumption in China shows, increases of unhealthy food prices are associated with decreased consumption of those food. According to this recommendation, the WHO also mentioned that Member States should identify and address the specific national approach depending on its own situations, thus can derive the
Whenever it comes to the topic of obesity, there are many proposed solutions to combat the problem. One such solution that has become more popular is a “fat tax”. Now the problems that come with setting up such a tax is to define one’s terms. What factors should constitute the taxing that is associated with obesity? In Daniel Engber’s piece called “Let Them Drink Water!”, he talks about how taxing directly in a per pound overweight fashion isn’t really ideal.
Article: Smokers, retailers burn as Pennsylvania cigarette tax rises. This article discuss the introduction of an excise tax, “when the producer or seller who pays the tax to the government is expected to try to recover or shift the tax by raising the price paid by the buyer” imposed on cigarettes in the us state of Pennsylvania and how the increase in price of a packet of cigarettes will effect the primary stalk-holders of the cigarette market. In this case the consumer, the sellers and the government. Cigarettes are a demerit good. “A good whose consumption is considered unhealthy, degrading, or otherwise socially undesirable due to the perceived negative effects on the consumers themselves” they are often overused because people aren't
The tax has a few exceptions which could be exploited by the public and the tax would not have the desired effect on the public and obesity rates. The truth is that no one knows what will happen after the tax is put into place, there have not been any studies carried out to see what alternatives the public will go for. It is more than likely that they will continue buying the drinks they have loved all their lives. The tastes of a nation do not change overnight. They take years, or over decades to
1. In favor of ban on tobacco advertising: The ban of tobacco advertising is justified because it is the moral responsibility of the government to protect the welfare of its citizens as tobacco is known to cause serious health issues and death. The number of deaths due to illnesses caused by tobacco has been exponentially rising. According to WHO, there were 4,023 deaths in 1998 and the number is estimated to rise to 8.4 million deaths in 2020 and 10 million in 2030. Advertising should also be banned so as not to influence the youth to start smoking.
Cigarettes smoking kills more than 480,000 Americans each year including 41,000 due to second-hand smoke. Smoking costs the taxpayer up to 170 billion in direct medical costs. By banning cigarettes, governments will provide grounds for the first step in slowing of the effects of smoking in the general population. With time people will move on the other vices or healthier alternative options. Thereby realizing savings in terms of health care and rehabilitation costs that can be diverted towards profitable economics activities.
Smoking has been around for way too long. This destructive money making business has caused many deaths, illnesses, and addictions to worse things such as drugs. Even though cigarettes are so harmful to our society and our society is aware, people still choose to let all kinds of weird chemicals that they can't pronounce travel down their throat in which is slowly killing them. On top of all of that, smoking smells bad, can give people second hand grossness, and it causes cancer. But there are solutions to this smoking problem and it's actually pretty simple: We can find healthy alternatives to the smoking addiction and make it illegal.
Besides all these harmful ingredients, cigarette also should be prohibited for all the incurable diseases such as lung cancer, throat cancer, liver cancer, pneumonia, bronchitis and many more fatal sickness. To add to it, millions died annually due to cigarettes. The number of deaths cigarettes caused is more than the number of deaths caused by illicit drugs combined. Last but not least, prohibiting cigarettes will bring good not only to humans but to the environment as well, there will be no cigarette buds laying on the floor if there are no smokers. This could help the littering issues too.
This is not only control the marketing for producer on sugar-sweetened drinks, but also decrease the consumption by fat tax. According to the research on internet about tax and negative externalities, this is a best way to solve the public health challenge associated with the deterioration of the population’s dietary habits. Maybe it is difficult for government to change the daily habits, but the way to added fat tax is a kind of solution to maintain the condition of marketing. Because we can’t disregard that sugar-sweetened is detrimental to health. At the same time, it will bring a lot of negative affect for the marketing of sugar-sweetened drinks in a short term.