THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK AND RELEVANCE OF THEORIES.
This part of the study intends to relate the study to two theories that could explain corruption, and later to illuminate its relevance to the study. The following theories are being considered; social learning theory, and social disorganization theory. The first step is to explain the tenets of each theory, and thereafter relate them to explain and illuminate its relevance to the study.
1. SOCIAL LEARNING THEORY.
The proponent of this theory is Albert Bandura. He hypothesizes that people learn from one another through observation, imitation, and modeling. Central to the theory is that new behavior can be acquired by observing and imitating other people’s behavior. Social learning takes place in a common environment and can occur through observation and direct instruction. The social learning also occurs through observation of rewards and punishments. If a behavior is rewarded there is a possibility that such behavior will continue but when punishment is applied, it is likely people desist from the behavior (Bandura, 1986).
The key tenets of the social theory include the following.
1. Learning is not purely behavioral; rather it is a cognitive process that takes place in a social context.
2. Learning can occur by observing the consequences of the behavior.
3.
…show more content…
The brokenness is seen in the various conflict that is been exhibited virtually in every ethnic group in Nigeria, due to the fact that leaders can no longer meet the basic needs of citizens. The followers, on the other hands, have developed various dubious behaviors, attitudes, strategies in exploiting others to amass wealth through kidnapping, ritual killing, robbery, yahoo boys, and many others. In other words, the majority of Nigerians have become skilled at participating in a culture that approves
I chose the movie American history X and the theory is Sutherland’s differential Association theory (DAT). We look at many theories. In this theory people are taught that beliefs, involvements, behaviors, and attachments, can possess pro-social attachment. In the movie we see a correlation between the two brothers which shows social control theory, social bonding and social attachments. We then examine Edward Sutherland’s theory to begin to understand that, what we have learned from behaviors are taught.
The social learning theory is “a social learning
They learn from observing others’ behavior, attitudes, and the outcomes of those behaviors This theory is often referred to as a bridge between behaviorist and cognitive learning theories because it encompasses attention, memory, and motivation. Richard Ramirez is prime example of the social learning theory. He wanted respect from his cousin, and tried to gain it by modeling his behavior towards the crimes that he saw happening to women from the photos that his cousin showed him after he returned from Vietnam. Shortly after his cousin’s return, he started doing drugs and later turned violent. He heard stories from his cousin about how he brutally attacked women, and fed off his cousin’s body language while he told the stories of what he did to those
The Socio-behaviorist theory (behaviorism) Socio-behaviorists often study how children 's experiences model their behaviors (Nolan & Raban, 2015). Behaviorism believes that what matters is not the development itself, but the external factors that shape children 's behaviors (Nolan & Raban, 2015). This theory demonstrates that teachers and mentors dominate and instruct child-related activities, and they decide what children should learn and how to learn (Nolan & Raban, 2015). Reinforcement, which is an essential factor that helps children to learn particular behaviors, generally refers to rewards and punishments (Nolan & Raban, 2015). Children are more likely to repeat actions that result in receiving praise; in contrast, they may ignore or abandon behaviors that make them get punishment.
Social learning theory and social bonding theory are two theories that may be compared and contrasted because they both overlap and differ. Although these theories have their similarities and differences, one theory may prove to be more convincing in terms of applying the theory to the understanding of crime and delinquency. Social learning theory refers to Akers’ theory of crime and deviance. Akers attempted to specify the mechanism and processes through which criminal learning takes place by explaining crime and deviance; he did this in such a way that the likelihood of conforming or deviant behavior based on the influence of an individual’s history of learning was accounted for. This theory was based off Sutherland’s differential association theory, which had nine propositions outlining the process by which individuals acquire attitudes favorable to criminal or delinquent behavior with the basic idea that people tend to associate with others in which they come into contact.
What this theory engages with is the assumption that the engagement of behavior begins after the observation of similar behaviors in others. (Wong,
First, the Social Learning theory is defined as when people or in this case juveniles learn from each other from either observation, imitation, or modeling. The version of this theory
By the time Ivan Milat was finally accused and convicted for murder, at least seven known people had their lives taken by him in the Belanglo State Forest. Ivan Milat quickly became one of Australia’s most notorious serial killers, earning the title of the Backpack killer. This case study will take Ivan Millat’s crimes from a young age and his eventual escalation into murder and linking it to Bandura social learning theory. Bandura’s social learning theory states that people’s behaviour is learned from the environment through the process of observational learning. It is believed children observe the people around them behaving in various ways and process that behaviour as the acceptable way of behaving even though it may be classified as socially
Aggression is a spoken or physical behavior that causes intentional harm to a person. There are many different theories that argue what the cause of aggression is but this can be divided into two major types: people who think that aggression is inborn and those that view it as a learning behavior. The Social cognitive theory states that we learn behaviors through observation and modeling and this could be implied that we learn aggressive behaviors through observing and imitating others. The Social Cognitive theory claims that people learn behaviors from observation, modeling, and motivation such as positive reinforcement. Psychologists mention that people learn behaviors by imitating models through observational learning; as well as through
At some point in our lives, we have learned by observing the behaviors of others. Observation can play a very important role in determining what and how we learn. It can have positive or negative effects on one 's development and behavior, especially in children. This is demonstrated in the social learning theory.
A child’s family and friends can either keep them away from crime or allow them to be involved. When these children grow up in a hostile or negligible environment they will turn to their friends for support. If these friends are not guiding them to do the right thing they are more vulnerable to criminal behavior. Positive role models are crucial in the building of a child’s moral compass. Children with something to look forward to will be less likely to engage in criminal behavior.
That is, even teachers, parents and other elder family members can learn or understand how to apply social learning theory, for example, using reinforcement, punishment and modeling, to affect people’e behaviors by looking at related books.
" Behaviour is learned from the environment through the process of observational learning." The behaviour we observed is models. In social life, children encompassed with effective people like parents, siblings, friends, tv characters and teachers etc. They attract to certain people and encode the behaviour and later imitate the behaviour interest to them regardless whether it is appropriate or inappropriate for them.