ABSTRACT In speech recognition, speaker-dependence of a speech recognition system comes from the speech feature, and the variation of vocal tract shape is the major source of inter-speaker variations of the speech feature. Speaker normalization is a process to transform the short-time speech feature of a given speaker to better match some speaker independent model. Vocal tract length normalization (VTLN) is a popular speaker normalization scheme wherein the frequency of the short-time spectrum associated with a speech is rescaled or warped to normalize the speech. In this work, we develop a speaker normalization scheme by exploiting the fact that frequency domain transformations can be accomplished entirely in the cepstral domain through the …show more content…
The reason of speaker-dependence of speech signal is very complicated. It is not only related to the physical differences of speakers, such as vocal tract shape, but also related to the linguistic differences, such as accent, dialect or even the mental state of the speaker. But researchers agree that one of the major source of inter-speaker variance is the vocal tract shape, especially the vocal tract length (VTL). Therefore, one of the most popular speaker normalization schemes is vocal tract length normalization (VTLN). Many researchers have been working on the VTLN via frequency warping (FWP) in order to compensate for the speaker variation. In a typical implementation of VTLN, a digitally sampled utterance is windowed to isolate a short segment, then analyzed with the FFT to obtain the short-time spectrum. Normalization is achieved by warping the frequency axis of the short-time spectrum using a suitable
Smolla writes about the First Amendment in his essay, "Speech Overview". He discusses what freedom of speech is, why Americans hold the First Amendment in such high regard, and how it can be conflicting to many American's "social instincts". The main idea that Smolla is arguing is that Americans embrace freedom of speech and individuality, even though it may cause conflict. He recognizes that some limitations must exist, but the freedom to express our thoughts is the American way. Smolla points out that many controversial items are approved due to the first amendment, even though they conflict with patriotism.
Dr. Claud Anderson is an incredible speaker that understands the difficulties African Americans face in today’s society. He brought up several relevant points that every black should understand in order to fix the problems we face. First, we have to know what the problem is to be able to improve the situation. Many civil rights activist like, Rev. Al Sharpton and Martin Luther King Jr., have tricked our minds into thinking that civil rights is the root to all of the struggles African Americans face. In reality, the problem is blacks are in the same position as they were after the civil war.
The source is a campaign speech advocating for imperialism. A written speech can be difficult to analyze because the tone the speaker uses when he speaks can imply more meaning than the words he says. Not all the details of the speech are included when it is typed up because the written version is missing the gestures, inflections, and tone of the original speech. The source is a persuasive speech intended to create voters for imperialism.
The Soldiers’ Monument is located in Phinney Park in Gorham, ME. Commemorating the citizens who served in the Great War, the monument was erected in 1936 as part of the town 's bicentennial celebration. The monument is made of red granite, and includes a bronze plaque which is engraved with the names of the one-hundred and thirty-five veterans from Gorham. Among the names are, Lewis L. Alden who served as a private in the 33rd Co, and died of disease on September. 22., 1918 at the age of 29 and Austin Alden (b. 1893 - 1978), a long time resident of Gorham.
Comparing Speeches Many civil rights leaders have spoken out about their controversial views of how to address injustices. For instance, during the Civil Right Movement, Kathie Amatniek and Harvey Milk both spoke to voice that their societies that are directing injustices towards gays and women. Using pathos and metaphors, Amatniek wants America to rid of traditional views of gender. Meanwhile, Harvey Milk uses using pathos, diction and humor to connect with his mainly homophobic audience to abolish the negative stereotypes of gays.
Crip technoscience is a design of architecture which disabled people can easily use/access. In the speech, Hamraie explained that Crip tech is not a simple science or engineering, but it is rather a way to understand the design making process; to conceive a certain design, one needs to be well known about the discomforts of the disabled in their daily lives. Specifically, Hamraie articulated that those inconveniences originate from social/institutional narratives rather than scientific/biological reasons, which means that the society is constructed upon the abled-centric systems. Under the name of “fast development of technology,” some “trivial” discomforts of minority groups were often neglected. Crip tech illuminates the architectural structure
I, Molly Saindon, am declaring my independence from Central Unit School District #4 entire schooling system. As many know, we as students slave away for fourteen years of our life within the schooling district of Central Unit School District #4. This must stop today. The people who love us are sending us away to camps that no man should have to endure. We encounter the harsh commentary from the other adolescent people, the never ending amount of work given every day, and the long lecturing hours that seem to never end.
American journalist and politician, Clare Boothe Luce, in her opening speech at the 1960 Women’s National Press Club meeting, prepares her audience, qualifying and defending her forthcoming criticism. Luce’s purpose is to provoke thought in the journalist’s minds on what journalism is really about at its core. She adopts a frank and humorous tone to best capture the attention of her intended audience of female journalists. Through, appealing to the ethos, logos, and pathos with flattery, syllogism, and rhetorical questioning to prepare the audience for her message: “the tendency of the American press to sacrifice journalistic integrity in favor of the perceived public demand for sensationalist stories.” In the first paragraph of her speech, Luce assures the audience that “[she is] happy and flattered to be a guest of honor…”
The various ideologies of love mentioned by speakers in Plato’s Symposium portrayed the social and cultural aspect of ancient Greece. In the text, there were series of speeches given by Phaedrus, Pausanias, Eryximachus, Aristophanes, Socrates, and Agathon about the idea of love, specifically the effect and nature of Eros. Within the speakers, Agathon’s speech was exceptional in that his speech shifted the focus of the audience from effect of Eros on people, to the nature and gifts from the Eros. Despite Agathon’s exceptional remarks about Eros, Socrates challenged Agathon’s characterization of Eros through utilization of Socratic Method.
On November 13th, 1969, Spiro Agnew, who was the Vice President at the time, gave the speech, Television News Coverage, about how news producers are becoming too powerful (Bibliography.com.) To successfully inform his audience, he uses many rhetorical strategies to keep everyone engaged and attentive. Agnew delivered an exceptional speech by using multiple techniques such as analogies, anaphoras, parallelism, and rhetorical questions to justify this problem to his audience. To help his audience understand what is being addressed, Agnew uses analogies to connect his ideas to familiar objects.
The voice is incredibly unique, when listening to someone speak you only hear it once. The reason I said you only
Kelly uses her time before the National American Women’s Suffrage Association to convince those in the audience that child labor is a women’s suffrage issue; that the mother’s, aunts, and sisters have a responsibility to help these children, which they cannot currently fulfil. She appeals directly to them by using little girls as examples in almost every paragraph, the repetition of “while we sleep,” and appeals directly to the hearts of a mother or parent. Kelly understands that this group’s main concern is the right to vote, and once they receive it, she wants to ensure that they will use that power to end child labor. Her speech was given fifteen years before women are finally granted the right to vote, yet it gives the members of the
The Importance of Freedom of Speech Every person deserves the right to speak about whatever they want, whenever they want. It does not matter if the person is rich or poor, good or bad, because all opinions matter. Freedom of speech is a person's right to express their opinions as much as they please. Just like in the novel “Haroun and the Sea of Stories”, the enemies, the Chupwalas, made a vow to be silent.
Garrit and Oetting are both prominent Speech Language Pathologists and have been recognized by the American Speech-Language Hearing Association. The authors work in the field of Communication Sciences and Disorders at Louisiana State University in Baton Rouge. The article was trustworthy because of its substantial
In this source analysis, I will look into the speech given by German Social Democrat, Otto Wels on March 23, 1933. It should also be mentioned that Thomas Dunlap translated this speech into English, which will be the primary source for this essay. The speech given by Wells was in protest to Hitler’s Enabling act; a law that would help provide Hitler and his followers with a legal path towards a dictatorship. The vote for the enabling act and the speech given by Wells, were held in the Reichstag on the same day, but as history has shown, Hitler’s Nazi Party prevailed, and the democratic makeup of the Weimer Republic was washed away. The significance of this speech is quite prevalent today, in retrospect to the grisly past of the Third Reich,