“Cheating is more likely to occur when students feel alienated from school and dissociate from school rules and procedures. It is less likely when students are closely identified with school.” (Finn, K. V., & Frone, M. R. ,2004). But by this it might lead to a negative effect that a student could be expelled from the college/school or fail the course. A student might submit a report or an essay from buying it from another person or purchasing it online, which might be different from the topic that they had chose in class, which might get them to be caught by their professors, the styling might be odd or the list of references might be different from the original topic, in this case a student is slightly to take a zero in there report or the doctor might fail the student in the course. One of the reasons why a
According to a research, students who were forced to wear school uniforms showed many stressful emotional graphs and aspect of action. This is especially harmful when they are in a critical period of personality formation. Another important reason not to force students wear school uniforms is when students look different and express their outlooks, it makes them to be tolerant, and to understand other’s differences. If a student wore uniforms for several years, he or she cannot understand other person who wears different uniform. It makes students to lose diversity and tolerance towards strangers and people who are in a minority.
Although school suspensions can be useful whenever a student misbehaves, the punishment can sometimes not even affect the student behavior against other students, limit students from learning new curriculum and passing their grade, and could possibly affect their career life. The reasons that suspension can affect these things is because whenever a student goes home because of being suspended they don’t actually think about what they’ve done, including the fact that the student doesn’t want to go to school in the first place. Suspension can affect the behavior the student has against another student because they may have caused them to commit the “crime”. Most kids who get suspended “joke around” talking about guns and shooting up the school, but the community doesn’t think this is safe because it’s causing more parents to worry about their child being at school when there could be a possible threat to shoot up a school. Most firemen and policemen are sending out special messages to parents to show their
School Suspensions Suspension is a good punishment for misbehaving, but do they really want to be punished by not going to school for a couple of days? Suspensions are used to punish a student who has committed a minor crime in school. Usually kids are committing a “crime” because something has hurt them inside and they’re just trying to show what they’re feeling against the person that made them feel bad. So, are the students really responsible for their actions? Although school suspensions can be useful whenever a student misbehaves, the punishment can sometimes not even affect the student behavior against other students, limit students from learning new material and passing their grade, and could possibly affect their career life.
Abstract The problem of “Truancy” is increasingly common in Hong Kong and is an issue of arousing the general public’s concern to students ' behavior, for example Truancy, students who usually run away from school, attributing to the current Hong Kong Educational System. According to the reciprocal determinism of the social cognitive theory suggested by Bandura (1977), a person’s behavior is the result of the interaction between personal factors and environmental factors, resulting in a student who run away from school, are generated by the in interaction of several factors (Bandura, 1977). There are many factors cause them have lower learning motivation, for example personal factors, family factors, peers factors, school factors and social
It puts them at a disadvantage. It allows educators and school personnels to view them as incapable. In essence, this will lead to teachers and school staff having low expectations for these groups of students. According to Ladson-Billings (2006),” Whether teachers think of their students as needy and deficient or capable and resilient can spell the difference between pedagogy grounded in compensatory perspective and those grounded in critical and liberatory ones “(p. 31). This is significant to note because this perpetuates the notion that students of color need to be excluded from learning environment when their behavior becomes “too disruptive”.
School failure Before entering into a category of school failure, it is necessary to specify why, when the subject is discussed, there is stinging among students committed to pedagogy ?, the annoyance occurs because the responsibility for school failure usually lies with the student, Leaving aside other factors such as the state, society and the school itself. The exhaustion of the classical social sciences, whose theories, methods and investigative procedures were kept short in order to account for the complexity of social life and the current emergent dynamics (including school failure), impede grasping and understanding of dynamism, The plasticity and the indeterminacy of these processes, for this reason, this category must be approached as an emerging and current social dynamics. On the other hand, the modern state within its duties guarantees the right to education for all in an inclusive and egalitarian manner, which has generated assistance to classrooms of great diversity of people, be it social, cultural, individual and Family, that is why the school has had to assimilate many changes and in many occasions not take the appropriate measures to address the different problems. Therefore, the construction of the category of school failure will allow to rub the different theories that on this subject have been worked. The subject has been focused from different disciplines like the psychology that resorts to the intelligence of the subject
In this regard I do not feel free to express myself in the class most of the time, and my language barrier makes matters worse. As I mentioned before teachers could use the weakness of the learner to prove his power or domination. As a student the issue effects my participation to the lesson even effects my self-confidence. Education system defends freedom of self-expression, but does not allow to express the thoughts you have apart from what have thought, that is the proof of lack of liberation that derivation of stultification. How ironically is that we all oppressed students strive to become an oppressor in future in this unemancipated situation!
Students that lack understanding and comprehension are often tempted by the shortcuts of cheating in the classroom.Tommy Raskin in his article “Cheating Students How Our Schools Fail the Humanistic Vision of Education” state “Students are pushed into constant moods of discontent and reckless behavior because school restricts them to an insular environment for the greater portion of their week”(25). Instead of bemoaning students of learning, teachers should build an authentic and empowering way
In addition to peer bullying, some students suffer from bullying at the hands of teachers who embarrass or demean them in front of their class. Students who perform poorly, for example, may be chastened or insulted before their peers. No-bullying policies include not tolerating bullying from teachers in Filipino schools. Teachers who humiliate students in public or private face the risk of administrative sanctions by their school as per the DepEd’s Child Protection