For many years, there have been disputes on whether college athletes should be paid or not. “There are thousands of big-time college football players, many who are poor. They put up with playing for free because it’s impossible to pursue a career in the NFL, unless they play at least 3 years in college. Less than 1% actually end up signing pro contracts, and even fewer even make serious money.” (B) “There are student-athletes who have to leave school early because they do not have enough money to continue or to pay their bills and leaving school for a career in pro sports is an easy way of making money. The argument is that if student-athletes get paid, they will remain in school and complete the education.” (J) “The truth is that “full” scholarships don’t always entirely cover tuition and cost of living. Some …show more content…
Money is accumulated everywhere in sports, and the athletes put their lives on the line every day. College athletes should be paid due to the huge amount of injuries and money brought into the school. The athletes spend most of their time playing a sport, than being in class. “Overall graduation rate for all male students were 54%. For football it was 50% and 41% for male basketball players. From 1995 to 1999, Ohio State graduated 31% of its men's basketball players. The 1999 men’s basketball NCAA division one champion, UConn, managed to graduate a mere 29% of its team members between 1994 and 1997.” (P) Paying college athletes is a big problem. They should get some income because of all the things they do for the college. People bring colleges to court because they weren’t getting paid off of their playing skills or seeing themselves in a videogame like a former UCLA basketball player, Ed O’Bannon. Athletes that play for the college receive things from the college, but that’s not enough. They are in college for 4 years or more and they need money to
College Varsity Athletes Should be Paid In this paper, I argue that college varsity athletes should be paid for playing sports that bring in revenue. In particular, College football and basketball because they bring in the majority of the revenue for the schools. The revenue accomplished by college sports programs continues to increase, due to the growth in interest of the NCAA basketball tournament and the college football playoffs (Berry III, Page 270). Throughout the past few years, one of the main topics debated in college sports is whether or not the athletes should be paid.
Ryan Vanderfords’ article published in the Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal explores this issue of whether or not college athletes should be paid beyond what they receive in scholarships. Vanderford is currently a law associate at a law firm in Los Angeles, California. He played sports throughout high school and college, so the author can relate to this topic. The payment of college athletes has become a more prominent issue in today’s society then it has been in the past. He argues that at major universities, student athletes help the school generate their revenue and therefore should be paid.
Nathan Wise English II 1/2B Mrs. Barry March 10th, 2023 Why college athletes should get paid Eighty-Six percent of college athletes are below the poverty line and end up going into debt after school. Most college athletes will not have time to go to classes, practice for their sport, and spend time working at a job. This leads to them having to take out loans and going into debt. So if colleges added a way for athletes to get paid while practicing it would be very beneficial. College athletes deserve to be paid because they invest time and effort, risk injuries, and do most of the advertising for their sport.
As someone who was once a high school athlete, contemplating the decision to compete at the colligate level, I sympathize with those who feel taken advantage of. While many may think it is unfair, college athletes deserve to be paid
Over the past few years, the idea of paying college athletes has been a very hot and sought after topic to talk about. Many people desire and strive to one day be good enough at a sport that they can get a scholarship to continue their athletic careers. There has been many questions circulating in regards to if collegiate athletes should be paid to play for universities. Gaining an education and degree for cheaper than everyone else attending college should be more than enough to keep athletes playing for colleges. College athletes should not be paid to play their sport.
The money comes from T.V. contracts, merch sales, season pass ticket sales, and sponsorships, however college students don't get anything from that. College athletes put a lot of hard work and time into their sports and bring in money to the school in the ESPN article on if college athletes should be paid, Deion Sanders said “College athletes are workers” (Page 1.) This is important because it shows that these sports are like jobs to these students and they are making money for a company just to not get a penny of it. In addition, this is unfair to athletes who are instrumental in generating revenue, and they should be entitled to a portion of it. According to a 2018 report by Forbes, “The University Of Alabama football team alone generated $111 million dollars in revenue for the University; however the athletes who helped generate their revenue did not receive any compensation beyond their scholarship.”
College athletes put in a lot of time, effort, and work into the sport they’ve played since they were young, but they aren’t getting paid for it. These student athletes deserve to be paid because they put in countless hours of hard work and balance sports with school work. The first reason athletes in college do deserve to be compensated is because they don 't have time to fit in work with a school and athletic schedule. College athletes don’t have time to get a real job. Student athletes have a very busy schedule, they don’t have time to fit in a job.
This emphasizes that although athletic programs offer financial assistance to many students, the organizations do not fully cover the tuition of college. This relates directly to the argument about time management. If student athletes do not have enough time to work a job, then it translates into the funding of their education. Society often thinks that sport scholarships are given generously, when in reality they are not. Earning a “full ride” scholarship is tremendously challenging and rare.
After graduating from High School one may choose to further his or her education through college. People do this for many reasons. Some people do it for professional benefits, while others do it for sports athletics. This paper will be focusing on those who do go to college for athletic benefits. Specifically, this is focusing on how these college athletes do not get paid and why they should be paid.
College sports is one of the best-known entertainments around the world. But for the athletes, they are students first then athletes second. For college student-athletes, there are a variety of scholarships and grants to help pay for college or college debt. However, some critics say that student-athletes should be paid a salary like pro athletes would, with help from scholarships or grants. The authors of, College Athletes are being Educated, not Exploited, Val Ackerman and Larry Scott, argue that student-athletes are already paid by free education and other necessities.
It is no secret that college sports programs, namely football and men’s basketball, at prestigious schools are big business. The debate about whether or not to “pay” student athletes has been gaining traction lately. There are many who would say a college education, and degree, is a form of payment for student athletes. But there are many student athletes that will attest that it does not cover all expenses incurred, nor is it a guarantee of a college degree. Here, we will evaluate the topic and have a look from both viewpoints.
Mike says”Students all over the world work hard at the sport that true love and don’t get a lot in return for it”. While college athletes may not exactly be employees, they are more than just students. Consider the life of a student-athlete, though. The average Division I football player dedicates over 43hours per week to his sport, meaning that he spends more than a typical American work-week training and playing football, in addition to his class work. Their work, which generates exorbitant amounts of money year in and year out, deserves Compensation.
" This quote proves that the students are bringing in lots of money and the school has plenty to give. College athletes should be paid because they contribute to the school revenues. When it comes to getting fans in the arena it all happens because of the stars coming out of the locker room. Student athletes can be looked at as advertisement because they persuade people to come watch their skills.
True, but to be a student athlete is a tough ‘job’ to manage with going from the field to the library day in and day out: “Players are essentially working full-time football jobs while going to school; they deserve to be paid more than a scholarship” (Gregory). A scholarship isn’t just enough for these hard-working players who get rewarded with nothing at the end of the day. They often get a scholarship with the package, but that doesn’t cover all the expenses that come with college. Think of a college game that people attend often. Think of the money they’ve spent on the ticket(s), the food, the drinks, and even some souvenirs.
Athletes who get scholarships don’t have to deal or worry about student loans, paying for textbooks, the cost of campus living, and meal plans.(3) Students who get scholarships don’t have to worry about being in debt because of loans because their college education is paid off from the scholarship. Then in the state of Pennsylvania 71 percent of students leave a public four year institution in debt around $32,528.(3) This is a normal person graduating from a college. They have to worry about paying back all of that money and students who get scholarships don’t have to worry about it.