Instead, it is Germany’s Military reorganization because it reduced Germany’s military which made them feel weak and trapped which for a nationalism country, it is the worst to no longer feel the pride in your country the you used to. These four ways the Treaty of Versailles punished Germany after WWI helped the Treaty to be the cause of WWII. On that note I will leave you with, do you still believe one document couldn’t have helped to start World War
Overall, the Battle of Berlin was a very costly battle for all parties involved, but ultimately a necessary one. The Germans were weak compared to how they were positioned earlier in the war. It was the ideal time for the Soviets, and the Americans to strike them down. The atrocities that Germany, under the lead of Hitler, were committing had to be put to an end then and there. It was also in the best interest of the leader of the USSR, Joseph Stalin, that the war was ended before sooner than later.
Lewis M1917, F1 Grenade, Colt M1873, & M1905 bayonet) In addition, the US dispensed its allies with huge amounts of troops, food & raw materials. Moreover, Germany’s allies, Bulgaria, Turkey & Austria, were all defeated, leaving Germany with no backing. Furthermore, the defeat of the allies & the American provision helped in raising the morale of the allies, therefore weakening the morale of the Germans, which affected their performance all
General Clinton’s inaction after General Washington’s force departure guaranteed the historical unfolding of the Siege of Yorktown. The largest contributor to this British disaster lay in the lacking of an analytical apparatus, which could have effectively processed and utilized British intelligence. General Clinton chose to focus more on salvation in the form of reinforcements from Britain than on the immediate steps he could implement in his intelligence war fighting function to cement victory. This overreliance on an ineffective logistical support chain, combined with poor strategy, toxic leadership, and indecisiveness, resulted in an overly defensive positon. This ineptitude set the stage for the loss of British populace support, costing him the war of attrition.
Nationalism lead to war due to how it changed the people 's perception of their own country, as well as how these countries want to have more control/power. Nationalistic propaganda was a major influence on the war, mostly due to how entire populations would base their opinions on what they read and/or saw. This propaganda would discuss how the country was powerful and deserved much more power, leading the people into thinking they could easily win a war, and how fighting a war was important for the growth of their country. Source 1.A describes having a strong sense of nationalism by explaining how the only nations that have become more powerful are those that "do not flinch from war". This directly links nationalism to war since countries that
First of all the Roman People did not want to serve in the military. They were used to the lavish lifestyle that the Roman people enjoyed (class notes). In order to fill this hole in the Roman Army they had to hire German Mercenaries. The loyalty of these mercenaries was questionable since they did not pledge allegiance to the Emperor (class notes). “The Roman Army was composed entirely of Germans” but the worst part was that the army could not even defend their own territory (DBQ, Doc.
Literary historian Paul Fussell observes that “Every war is ironic because every war is worse than expected. Every war constitutes an irony of situation because its means are so melodramatically disproportionate to its presumed ends.” Situational irony occurs when an outcome is different than what was expected, and the events of August 1914 followed by a four-year stalemate undermined all expectations of a limited war. Even more ironic is that despite evidence to the contrary, men continue to believe that there are inalienable certainties that exist in war, that measurable principles executed in operational lines and masses govern its science. Antoine de Jomini was one such military theorist who believed that war “’is controlled by invariable
These causes created such an event that impacted the world so strongly. This war that struck many should never be forgotten. It showed how powerful and how weak countries are and how far they will go to show that they are stronger. It resulted in such a shocking and heroic
WALZER ON SUPREME EMERGENCY Michael Walzer, otherwise a strict adherent to the satisfaction of just in bello conditions in war, especially to the condition of non-combatant immunity, argues that in supreme emergencies, a state actor can infringe upon this principle and directly target enemy civilians’ (SCHWENKENBECHER 2009). What is a supreme emergency? According to Michael Walzer it is: ‘… an ultimate threat to everything decent in our lives, an ideology and a practice of domination so murderous, so degrading even to those who might survive, that the consequences of its final victory were literally beyond calculation, immeasurably awful.’ (SCHWENKENBECHER 2009)Hence, a supreme emergency is an exceptional and threatening situation that collectives
History is all about inspiring speeches, gruesome wars, and unexpected events that decide the course of the future. The Cold War is not an example of a war, but a highly important event, considering there was no actual fighting. The Cold War started because the Soviet 's wanted to spread communism, but America was getting in their way to stop it. Three major factors also contributed to the conflict of war, the most obvious one being the U.S. wanted to stop communism, another being both the Soviet Union and the United States were afraid of each other, and finally competition, because everyone needs some good competition. These factors are both reasons why the war started, and "weapons" that were used.