Essay On Pros And Cons Of Paying College Athletes

1027 Words5 Pages
Playing sports of any kind comes with associated risks, which is why pro athletes are some of the highest paid individuals in the industry. During his 3.5-year career, an average pro football player makes over $6 million, while an average professional basketball player makes over $24 million during his 4.8-year career.

So why aren't student-athletes afforded the same compensation? They are still at risk every time they step inside the court or in the field, after all. Kevin Ware, for example, suffered a gruesome injury while playing as a guard for Rockdale County High in metro Atlanta. Before the incident, he was the most famous player in college basketball, something that had to take a back seat because of what happened. although he's now restarting his career and his life, there is no denying that being a college
…show more content…
List of Pros of Paying College Athletes

Provides a source of funds
After academic responsibilities, most college athletes spend their time practicing, which leaves little room for finding other means of making money to compensate for food board books and other expenses not covered by their scholarship grants. While other students are working part time, college athletes are working hard in court in the field or in the rink, without earning even a single dollar. So getting paid, even a little extra, would go a long way to helping them pay for all their needs. This would also make a huge difference for students from families with low income.

Eliminate shady practices
Athletes can be forced to do anything out of necessity, making them vulnerable to abuses. people with a vested interest in a particular game can offer them special 'privileges' for shaving points, faking an injury or other ways that can influence the outcome of a game. If college players are well compensated, however, light could be shed on shady businesses that happen on the sidelines.

Attract more
Open Document