This requires the ‘torturing’ of animals and most likely the killing of them. Animal testing can be a very cruel process, in most cases animals get harmed during the process ("Product Testing: Toxic and Tragic."). So is this ethically correct? On the other hand, what would happen if we wouldn’t use animals to test the new products on such as TBHQ. Most likely if we hadn’t used animal testing for TBHQ, people would have suffered themselves from the consequences.
A number of scientists advocate the use of live animals in scientific research. They think that animal tests can improve their understanding of medical knowledge. According to ProCon Organization (2016),’’animals and humans are so biologically similar, they are susceptible to many of the same conditions and illnesses, including heart
Some people hate rodents including mice and rats, but using them for testing is not okay. Horses, cats, dogs, bird and even fish are now used in testings. These animals were just a few of the hundreds used for the research and testing. Animal testing should be prohibited because it’s cruel and inhumane, animals are being tortured while in those labs, and the experiments are wasting animals lives. One of the most important and most talked about is laboratories are inhumane and cruel to a large assortment of animals.
We shouldn’t silent such a topic, because of fears of upsetting people who affected – yet they should know what they are applying to their face is being used to torture innocent animals. One type of testing – and arguably, one of the worst – is Draize tests. This involves taking a young rabbit and trapping hundreds in confined stocks together. Then, taking a rabbit, clipping its eyelids to prevent their bodies instinct to repel the toxic chemicals by blinking, and shaving their stomachs. Toxic chemicals are then poured and smeared in the rabbit’s eyes and monitored to check how toxic it is.
There are some limitations with the usage of large animal species (viz., pigs, dogs, feline models and non human primates) such as economic constraints, practical difficulties, extreme care and ethical considerations. A complete and comprehensive research in these animal species may provide better understanding of the disease and its complications, mechanism and discovery of new therapy, as these animals more closely imitate human
Although, personality is unique to the individual, experts in the field of psychology have studied the idea that personality is somewhat based upon biology, therefore implying that the biological makeup plays a role in a person’s personality. Extensive research and indisputable evidence through long-term studies has supported the idea that personality is directly influenced by genetics. Evidence that supports the biological influence on personality development is based on direct evidence through the examination of genes and studies of individuals who have the same genetic makeup. Both identical and fraternal twins are good candidates and are commonly used for genetic studies in medical and psychology research. Throughout history, many twins have been placed in situations where they were raised in completely different environments, therefore they have been utilized in testing to determine the influence of genetics on every aspect of our composition.
Animal testing is a controversial topic with lots of different opinions and ideas on both sides regarding to the ethics of this practice. Although many animals are abused and killed every year a cause of this cruel and painful method, scientists, cosmetic and drug companies continue to face opposition due to the fact that they use animals for the safety of their products and medical research. Some feel that this procedure goes against animals rights, while others see the positive impact that animal testing brings to humans. What is animal testing? For scientists, animal testing is the ‘‘use of animals to develop medical treatments, determine the toxicity of medications, and check the safety of products destined for human use, commercial, and health care uses’’ ( Pro con, http://animal-testing.procon.org/).
These experiments not only went on for months but also continued although was proven that smoke tobacco caused cancer, therefore the experiments were unnecessary. And other similar experiments had been used to get enough data on toxicity of lead, rat poison, etc. To determine the lethal doses of these substances the researchers force animal to inhale or to eat them these toxics substances till the half or 75% of the group died. Survivors had several sequels in their skins, brain, muscles, etc (Boyd 1991). The cruelty inflicted on these animal is real and barbaric and there is no justification for performing them.
There were over 200 sheeps killed until one of them was the survivor, Dolly. Many of these animals died just because of the ambition of science. The world should start considering any form of cloning as cruelty. Many of the citizens in the world are uneducated about the negative impact that cloning could have on our society. Under no circumstance a human-being should be murdered for his additional parts.
Inquiry Unit a. Formulate two different inquiry questions for your assigned issue (One could be the inquiry unit from your group, so the other can be a question that you individually wonder about). [Criterion B] i. To what extent are genetically modified chimeras for organ replication and harvesting more or less important than domestic animals? ii. To what extent would an animal still be considered an animal of some certain species if most of its organs are genetically modified to replicate a human’s?