My opinion is why change the constitution. It is basic and easy to follow and Americans have been using this system for a long period of time and its intentions were to be used for centuries. The constitution has kept our country together since it was created and gives individual a basic set of laws that gives them freedom that shouldn’t be changing every year or decade. Changing the amendments undermines the fundamental procedure that the country was created for. Who obtains mass knowledge that has the ability to know what to change in the constitution to make the country better?
This was a case that led to a statement by Justice Swayne in which he declared that “A treaty may supersede a prior act of Congress and an act of Congress may supersede a prior treaty.” (157). However, two months earlier an act had just been passed that terminated all Indian treaty processes. Thus Congress could pass laws that changed treaties, but no more treaties could be made that supersede the law. The tribes could no longer negotiate with the government as they used to, had they been viewed as sovereign (157). Lone Wolf v. Hitchcock (1903) case also proved to be blow for tribal sovereignty.
Perhaps the most famous Federalist paper, Federalist 10, starts off by saying that one of the biggest arguments that favors the Constitution is that it creates a government suited to minimize the harm caused by factions. Faction, in this case, is defined as a group of people whether a minority or majority based on class, race, and profession that all share a common interest. It was inevitable that factions would occur and perhaps the defining characteristic was the unequal distribution of property. This would ultimately lead the poor without property to become the majority in a “tyranny of the masses.” Madison believed that there were two solutions in preventing majority factions, 1) Remover the causes, and 2) Control the effects. There were
Marsha law was made to protect the people in time of war when there was no time to wait on politics. Furthermore, that is what President FDR did. One sentence from the president, with good reason, could change everything for Americans. All of this lead to the New York Times article “A Discredited Supreme Court Ruling that still Technically Stands.” This article talks about how the Court was able to pass this law
America 's versatility is its greatest strength, but how it is interpreted by its citizens is what causes conflict. As an American citizen, I am able to enjoy the liberties granted to me by the United States Constitution. I am allowed to speak freely and bear arms. However, I am not able to use these liberties to impeach other 's. It is important to remember that there is a relationship between good and evil, and both will continue to be present in our society; and in becoming an effective member of society, I must understand this and consistently acknowledge it in my own life.
The Constitution is a counter-transformation on the grounds that the Constitutional Convention was a meeting to totally update the Articles of Confederation, and that record fundamentally illustrated the administration at that period in time. Since an insurgency is a move towards a changed government, that would make the Constitution an unrest, and it is countering the disappointments of the Articles of Confederation. It is additionally a counter-transformation since a few provisions were placed in it to counteract uprisings, for example, that of Daniel (Shays ' Rebellion). Counter-transformation, in that sense, implied the Constitution was attempting to anticipate future upheavals. The Constitutional Convention additionally settled a legislature
They believed that because people are instinctively selfish, that people would have a hard time coexisting in a land where all people were supposed to be treated equal. Though the government was created to aid the people, it was also established to teach the people how to “live properly”. The fact that the constitution was written in the mindset that people needed to be, in a sense, controlled is was and remains a controversial topic. Many view the constitution’s favor for the rich, white, and male property owners was not so much of an “easier way to unify a nation” but more of a list of who it was going to be more desireable to govern. These facts aside, in order to instill equality to a newlywed nation, the people were given some basic human rights and the power to choose who was going to represent them in order to still make sure that the people were still the basis of the new government while still having control over them.
Clearly stated, the 2nd Amendment reads, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed”. Otis McDonald would find himself at the forefront of a controversial,
The second amendment states, “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed”, which means that any u.s citizen who qualifies the standards can store a weapon at his/her house. “The second amendment was adopted in December 15, 1791” which was adopted to guarantee us citizens safety; yet, we can 't feel
The second amendment gives citizens the right to bear arms. It was ratified on December 17, 1791. According to laws.com, “As passed by the Congress: A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. As ratified by the States: A well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” The second amendment, like all the other first ten amendments, is a part of the Bill of Rights, which was meant to keep the people as free as possible. This amendment was for the citizens to defend themselves in case of emergencies, back when the amendment was created, for defending themselves against British being one example.
The Magna Carta is a fundamental foundation set as an example for Americans to have an idea of the rule of law. And with John Locke’s meaningful intention of human nature and human rights, protecting individual 's life, liberty, and property have shown more than enough for America to prove that we have been protected by our rights all along. An example of life would be the second amendment. Which gives us the right to bear arms, which can be seen as protecting the lives of citizens of America. The Bill of rights have evolved drastically, per say, the thirteenth and fifteenth amendments; slaves didn’t have a say, they didn’t have rights - they weren’t even seen as people back then.
We need stronger national borders and need a more aggressive military defense. This all comes back to supporting the troops who protect and keep us safe as best as they can from the bad things that are trying to pour into this country. Let’s not only make America great again but lets bring America to God. In God we
“Intellectuals propounded the idea that man should be freed from the shackles of social convention and self-control, and the government enacted laws that promoted irresponsible behavior and created a welfare system.” Dalrymple continues his explanation with, “While my patients know in their hearts that what they are doing is wrong, and worse than wrong, they are encouraged nevertheless to do it by the strong belief that they have the right to do it, because everything is merely a matter of choice”. Conditions such as these create a society that lacks accountability. According to Dalrymple, society’s elite would rather see others live in poverty than admit their wrongs and Society will remain the same until they put limits on their own
In America, the issue of gun control has become an extremely controversial topic. Ever since the formation of this great nation, guns have been key tools and restricting them any further would present incomprehensible consequences. Placing stricter gun laws on the current situation or banning assault weapons will not decrease the death or crime rate but in fact quite the opposite. The republican party believes that with fewer gun restrictions and revision of current standards, we can make America a safer place. The right to bear arms is a fundamental right of any American citizen and this right needs to be protected as the fundamental freedom it is.
In the United States, the Second Amendment protects the right to “bear arms”. The Amendment states, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed” (U.S. Constitution. Amendment Ⅱ). This means that a strong military is a necessity for a safe country and household, so dictating the people’s right to own firearms is considered unconstitutional . Self defense and hunting are the most common reasons for owning a weapon in the U.S.