Introduction A new generation brings with it a set of new threats and challenges. According to Dr John Nagl, the modern military expects officers to “develop and maintain a high degree of adaptability” in order to meet the “contemporary demands and opportunities they are likely to face” . From solving complex problems to managing new threats, the military is required to always be well-informed and well-trained particularly when it comes to technology that is constantly changing. This essay will look into the spectrum of threats and challenges, the two focal points for countermeasures and recommendations to RBAF for preparing to meet the new demands placed on today’s military professionals.
Threats and Challenges
The spectrum of threats and challenges to the military continue to change over the years with some becoming increasingly more complex. As such, complex problems requires equally comprehensive solutions. These threats can be categorised into two types - traditional and non-traditional. Traditional threats
…show more content…
In the case of Brunei, the Defence White Paper (2011) has shown that security and stability of the sovereignty to be a priority in national defence policies . Furthermore, it highlights the importance of capacity building in the military as well as cooperation with international allies particularly among the ASEAN region as threats to global security have potential implications to Brunei’s own national defence. It goes on to add that preparedness to such challenges requires a working ‘global rules-based order’ with the United Nations as an example of an international organisation well-suited to oversee this. Since cyber-warfare and terrorism are increasingly becoming the two major challenges in today’s world, this essay will look into the kind of skills needed for
Above all, the most important role of american industry was war production. This is emphasized in document 1 “The superiority of the United states in weapons must be overwhelming so overwhelming that the Axis nations can never hope to catch up with it. In order to attain this overwhelming superiority the United states must build planes and tanks and guns to the utmost limit of our national capacity. We have the ability to produce arms not only for our own forces but also for the armies,navies and air forces fighting on our side.” This statement by Roosevelt, justified just how important war production or for the americans to produce weapons for war is.
The successful execution of the concepts found in Expeditionary Force 21 (EF21) reside in the ability of the Marine Corps to candidly assess the current state of the operating forces and operational needs while planning to future requirements. Shifting our focus towards the next fight will require, not an overhaul, but the refinement of how the service organizes to fight and operate with joint, and multinational, partners. This is rooted in the understanding that the Marine Corps must adjust its forward deployed posture in order to support the ability to respond across the range of military operations. Deciding where and when to deploy and how to organize in preparation for future challenges, while critical, will solely exist as an intellectual
So, what caused World War II, many ask. Well, you may be shocked to hear that one document was the cause. The Treaty of Versailles was a document that was signed to finalize Germany after WWI. The treaty punished Germany in many ways, including military reorganization, war guilt, territory loss, and reparations leading to World War II.
The second document highlights the National Security Council 68, a central document of the Cold War that laid out the strategic foundation for American foreign policy after the devastating decline of western European powers during World War II left the United States and Soviet Union as the dominant nations. The National Security Council argues that the Soviet Union poses a threat due to “being animated by a new fanatic faith” in communism to impose “absolute authority over the world” (Doc 2). This type of behavior is anti-ethical to the American values, so the fight between America and the Soviet Union was inevitable. The document outlined possible responses of isolation, diplomatic efforts to negotiate, or the rapid buildup of strength of
John Smith is expressing himself and supporting a figure that is known as an enemy to the United States: this is covered under the first amendment right for freedom of expression, religion, and speech. Mr. Smith is also protected by the Free Exercise Clause which “provides absolute protection for the right to express one’s religious beliefs and to assemble with other believers. It also protects people’s right to solicit funds and proselytize on behalf of religious organizations.” Likewise, John did not make any threats to the U.S Government by expressing his belief and support to Isis. He did not commit libel or slander; he did not use obscenity or fighting words.
Simply put, In a Communist system, individual people do not own land, factories, or machinery. Instead, the government or the whole community owns these things. The ultimate goal of communism is to create a classless society and creating a dictatorship (A government in which one ruler has complete control over a country.) For nearly 35 years, the Cold War took place between the Soviet Union and the United States. The war was referred to as cold because there was never any physical fighting between the two countries.
As Disrupters The strength of future militaries will be compared to our own; the expansive reach of the US military is the largest on Earth. From conflicts in South America to the Middle East and Asia, the US has always thrived during wartime, gaining much of its power from the aftermath of World War II. By much of the world today our country is seen as democratic invaders; bringing a message of democracy and freedom while still firmly holding our weapons. In this way, our country has shaped the world drastically; influencing both the progress of technology and the equivalent sizes of foreign militaries.
On an island near the Amazon there is this place known for a hunting ground. In the story, The Most Dangerous Game, Richard Collins Illustrates a character who struggles to realize a point in which he thought didn't Matter. There was a great amount of conflict between the character and himself, in which he realizes the point that didn't matter to him actually did matter. The author wrote the conflict to reflect a change in the character because some characters changes throughout the story. Rainsford is a big game hunter and he believes that nobody cares how the prey feels, but soon he gets a small idea of what it might feel like.
As people and technology continue to evolve so do the ways we fight wars. There is currently a gap in the knowledge and skills between current Noncommissioned Officers (NCO) and the NCOs future operations will demand. This paper goes over what the NCO 2020 Strategy is and how it will close that gap. It will identify the reasons for the NCO 2020 Strategy, the end state, and tasks NCOs must complete in the interim to realize that end state. This paper starts with the statement of the overall vision and intent of this strategy before delving into the three Lines of Effort (LOE).
The Most Dangerous Game Conflicts All stories have to have a conflict, the short story “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell has three important conflicts. Man against man, man against nature, man against himself are the three main conflicts that take place. For man against man Rainsford and General Zaroff are fighting each other in the hunting ‘game’. For man against nature Rainsford is fighting the sea once he hears the gunshots and is trying to get out of the water.
In the Constitution of the United States entrench a requirement and action to have a profession, which ensure the protection and safety of the Nation and State, “We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, …, provide for the common defence” . Basically, this statement is the presumption, that part of society gain a mandate to render an essential obligation to the Nation in a specific area, in particular case this is a defence. In order to fulfill stated obligation, part of society must have the necessary knowledge and skills. Next, they have to ensure and gain public trust and autonomy in their action. Finally, set high moral standards that reflect the values of society.
However, 10 years from now I believe the military would drastically change. Technology has leaped to new heights in the year 2015 and I believe it will become more advanced each year. Technology is implemented in everyday society and mostly in the military. This allows new aircrafts, vehicles, weapons, and communications to be upgraded; making them even deadlier than before. Although, this seems to be dangerous the U.S military has dire issues to fix.
General deterrence and Specific deterrence at first glance seems like it runs hand and hand. As you look closer and understand it better, you come to the realization that they are two different topics. General deterrence is focused on the legal punishment if you are caught committing a crime. Specific deterrence focuses on punishment of criminals that are apprehended. So many question still remain on how effective both deterrence really are.
Personal vision about the future of cyberwarfare Cyberwarfare already exists in reality and has been spread out among countries or organizations over the past few decades. The rising technologies including artificial intelligence and computational neural networks used by future computers will not only be significant in a new era of power and communications, but will also broaden the channel for cybercrimes, attacks and warfare. Future cyberwarfare will continue to scale up attacks against governments, corporations and even civilians in the next decade where it will be on par with traditional military and will might surpass these tactics. Future cyberwarfare will not just be targeted against military agencies or other government agencies.
National Security in the 21st Century will encompass threats ranging from fraud, corruption, illegal migration, transnational crime and environmental degradation. One could consider seven broad subject areas of focus, economic security, food security, health and environment security, personal security and community security. The new threats to national security will come from emerging issues like terrorism, oil and gas depletion, environmental concerns, including climatic alterations, HIV/AIDS and over-population. National Security