Essay On Violent Revolution And Civil Disobedience

“One Nation, under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all” powerfully concludes the American pledge, an oath declaring to the globe our unique commitment to uphold these righteous ideals. Unfortunately, as a result of human error, even a government founded upon these righteous principles may waver from the administration of justice and require redirection by its citizens. Through amendment of the Constitution, the founders allowed for this avenue of change, but unfortunately, historical events reveal this process often remains inaccessible. Consequently, individuals express their legislative discontent through two methods: Violent Revolution or Civil Disobedience. To avoid both regression into barbaric anarchy and maintain the principles

Furthermore, many opponents assert that devoted citizens must wait and allow time for legislators to repeal the law and emend the injustice. However, the lawfully “free” African Americans suffered for almost one hundred years after the Thirteenth Amendment until the beginning of the Civil Rights Movement. Until they gathered as a majority under Martin Luther King Jr and rallied behind courageous acts of civil disobedience, the voice of the African Americans remained mainly disregarded by the members of Congress. Similarly, in the events prior to the American Revolution, the founding fathers attempted to expose the injustice of the British government through the Declaration and Resolves of the First Continental Congress. The immediate rejection of this document by the England’s King and Parliament reveals the necessity for other methods to protest injustice. Civil disobedience provides a method to redirect the focus of our nation’s legislators to protect the liberties of every citizen, even if this object is contrary to the popular opinion of the public. An unwavering dedication to uphold democratic ideals must exist as the primary