Just imagine if you were in the store going to buy some beverages for a party. Then all of a sudden you see warning labels on every drink. How would you feel? Well I would feel very alarmed and not want to buy that product and that is exactly what the warning labels will do. On every food item and drink there are already warning labels. Those warning labels are the nutrition facts on the back of all boxes or containers. It tells you the amount of sugar, sodium, potassium, carbohydrates etc. It also shows all the ingredients. I created this scene so the reader is in question of, do we really need warning labels on every item? This illustrated my point because my point is we don't need anymore warning labels on items when there already is a warning label pretty much. I included this to get the readers attention and make them question their opinion on whether or not there should be warning labels. Warning labels are unnecessary to be put on …show more content…
Soon it will become excessive and be put on every item and it would be unnecessary and it defeats the purpose. That warning label is the nutrition facts on the back of every sugary drink. My reason makes sense because if you think about it, doesn't the nutrition facts state it all? People want to put warning labels on sugary drinks for what? The nutrition facts clearly state everything the consumer needs to know about what they are about to drink or eat. So a warning label is unnecessary. In an article by Evan Cook it states, "Beverage companies are already making efforts to help America be healthier (Cook, 2014). Coca-Cola for example, displays a calorie count on the front of nearly every drink produced." Lastly , the nutrition facts state everything the consumer may want to know about what they are buying and what they are gonna consume (Should there be warning labels on sugary drinks?,
This law was formed in order to regulate product labeling. It made sure that the food or drug label was not false or misleading. It also prevented food from having any hazardous ingredients in it, such as food or drugs being produced in dirty working conditions. In 1938, the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act was passed. This included “cosmetics and medical devices under control, required that drugs be labeled
In the article “Colleges Should Adopt Trigger Warnings” by Brianne Richson, her key idea is addressing why altogether colleges should implement trigger warnings; for all scholars who have agonized from traumatic past events also known as Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. The reason for this is to aid alert scholars on any course material that may remind them of a horrendous past event. A verification of that is Richson starts off her essay by stating “We all have that memory that we’d prefer people not bring up because we want to block it from our consciousness forever.” (“Richson 97”). She tells us how we all have memories that we wish would be obliterated, that’s why trigger warnings exist and why they should be in all colleges.
Food companies jump through meticulous hoops just for the reason of withholding nutritional information from their customers. “These companies fight, tooth and nail, against labeling. The fast food industry fought against giving you the calorie information. They fought against telling you if there is trans-fat in your food. The meat packing industry for years prevented country-of-origin labeling.
"When the FDA analyzed the Obamacare menu labeling rule, it acknowledged the competitiveness of the restaurant industry, consumer demand for nutrition information, and the fact that nutrition information is provided to restaurant patrons." (The Heritage Foundation). This quote clearly shows that the market is working as intended; in other words, when the consumers asked for nutritional information, they did not get it. Instead, they got employees who knew about the information. In Fahrenheit 451, they keep information away from their citizens as well.
Food regulation and laws are a normal part of our life. In the early 1900’s, big businesses were ruthless and more concerned with making larger profits than the quality of its products. Also, in that time, the competition between businesses was scarce opposed to today’s market. There are countless number of businesses and companies in which one can purchase their goods from. This causes companies to really focus on the quality of their product in order to please the consumer.
The Food and Drug Administration is the oldest “consumer protection agency in the federal government”. The purpose of the FDA is to protect consumers by assuring that all food supplies,medical devices,cosmetics,human and veterinary drugs,and products that emit radiation are safe and secure for our use. Although the official label for the FDA was not created until the 1930’s it’s beginnings can date all the way back to the year of 1848. It all started with a man named Lewis Beck.
The labels we see in our foods at grocery stores are not honest. The big companies put information that will make customers buy their product. In the essay “Don’t Blame the Eater”, written by David Zinczenko focuses on how bad customers are being informed about the food they consume. Zinczenko states “They would do well to protect themselves, and their customers, by providing the nutrition information people need to make informed choices about their products. Without such warnings we’ll see more sick, obese children and more angry, litigious parents,” (464).
They were more horrified to learn that the labels listing the ingredients in meat products were full of lies. The meat containing
Several acts have been passed that protect the safety and health of United States Consumers. The Food and Drug act of 1906 requires that there be unity and uniformity among food and drug products, and restricts the sale of hazardous goods. The Food Code of 2013 sets standards for food processing. The Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act ensures that products are not only safe for consumers, but that they are also fully aware of the goods they are buying. These acts beginning in 1906, have protected the public’s health, and prevented illness for over 100 years.
When it comes to nutrition labels on food packaging, it only shows the amount of sugar in grams, never in percent. This gimmicks people into thinking that its not much sugar in the product they’re eating, because while the grams seem small, people are unaware of the actual amount of sugar placed into the product. Moving on, since the 1900s, obese rates in America have drastically increased in the 2000s. This meaning that people are starting to eat more food, with sugar they did not even know was in there. This is unfair to the people who develop diseases and illnesses, like getting obese, diabetes or cancer, because of the unknown amount of sugar placed into the food.
In recent decade, the United States has seen supermarkets continuously get filled with packages labeled with things like “Low sodium” or “No Trans Fats.” Companies stick these labels on their food to match the current fads of what is good for you and what is not. In his essay Unhappy Meals, Michael Pollan advocates a return to natural and basic foods, and deplores nutritionism. Pollan argues that nutritionism does not actually tell people what is healthy or not, and that the only way to be sure you are eating healthy is to eat natural, fresh food.
Everyday people are eating genetically modified organisms and don’t even realize it! There are many people that have absolutely no knowledge of what GMO’s are. The United States needs to pass a federal law requiring the labeling of all genetically modified foods in the country. There are over 60 countries around the world that require the labeling of GMO’s, so why isn’t America doing the same? As consumers, we have the right to know what we’re eating and feeding our families.
The labelling of genetically modified foods is seen as wholesome common sense, and it should be required to have the information on the back of every product. People have been manipulating the genetic makeup of plants for numerous generations using the process of traditional cross breeding. Genetically modified crops have been traded, grown and consumed around the world, including Australia since 1996. The progress and advancement in this field has impacted the way we view the deeper issues of this technology. While genetic engineering crop property has been gradually increasing, so have concerns, in that producing and eating genetically modified foods may pose unexpected environmental and health hazards.
Throughout my research for my argumentative essay, I have come to a conclusion that labels on foods are confusing for most people, they are not clear enough and they make people second guess what they are buying. This problem has caused people to have real life issues and has caused this world to make some problems even bigger. I want these sources to help me argue that this is a big issue and that there is way to fix it. My research goals are to find sources that will provide the meaning of each words on the labels, discuss what problems these labels cause such as people to ruining their healthy lifestyle, causing people to have trouble finding out if they are allergic to the food, and causing people to waste more food. I also want to find
Consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages, which include soft drinks, fruit drinks, ice tea, energy and vitamin water drinks across the globe. Regular consumption of sugary sweetened beverages have been associated with weight gain, obesity and diabetes. The role of sugary sweetened beverages in the development of related chronic metabole diseases such as metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes, has not been quantitatively reviewed . How is consuming sugary beverages harmful to the body ?