Essay On Welfare Drug Testing

People who use the money they receive on things not necessary for their families constitutes as abusing their aid. Lawmakers and the public alike state that drug testing might be beneficial to prevent tax money from being funneled into illegal activity it does not guarantee that these people will not spend their money on other legal recreational activities and substances. Finally, lawmakers have yet to determine what the restriction and punishments should be for those who can not or have not passed their drug tests. The degree of punishment that would be indicative of a possible rehabilitation of the individual without also punishing the children of that home (Pollack,2006). Each of these reasons is a primary cause of the controversy that have prevented most states from enforcing drug testing before receiving benefits.

There are 3 main reasons why people objected to the legalization of marijuana. First, people who hold the against opinion believed that marijuana has completely no acceptable medicinal use. Second, legalizing marijuana might lead to the rising number of treatment and addiction in the world. Finally, people believed that the injuries and deaths rate from impaired driving might increase because of marijuana legalization. Marijuana should not be legalized because of it lack medicinal use, it encouraged addiction, and it increases the risk of driving accidents.

(hhs.gov pg,4) “The AKS is a criminal law that prohibits the knowing and willful payment of “remuneration” to induce or reward patient referrals or the generation of business involving any item or service payable by the Federal health care programs (e.g., drugs, supplies, or health care services for Medicare or Medicaid patients.” You might not think computers are remunerated, but any product that helps earn revenue is considered monetary. She is taking a personal gain for herself by getting a discount for her husband because she works for a company that partakes with the Federal health care program.

The welfare money comes out of the money taxpayers pay in. However many people question whether the money is being misused or not. Although people may misuse the welfare assistance for drugs or to support a drug habit, there are many families who make use from the money they are given therefore drug testing welfare patients should not be mandatory. Historically, many people around the United States have

A huge belief I have as to why these parents are not vaccinating is that they are not realizing the detrimental effects that measles had on children back when vaccines were not invented. The idea of childhood and infancy death is purposely being ignored because it is not relevant to this time period. Unvaccinated children are evidently more prone to catch and spread disease which is why this idea of not vaccinating children is unethical. Parents who refuse to vaccinate their children are making their children more susceptible these deadly diseases. This not only affects their children but children around them too.

States start programs that require welfare recipients to take a drug test and the programs end up costing them up to 1 million or, even more, depending on the number of welfare recipients that reside in that state. According to Time.com during the four months, Florida drug tested welfare recipients only 2.6% of applicants tested positive. Drug testing results do not justify the cost of the test and is using money that could be used for something much more important. States are having to pay for an expensive drug test while getting less positive tests and more negative tests. The states that are

One of the common debates in the sports industry is whether performance drugs should be banned from athletics. The common argument is that pills should be prevented because they are dangerous and harmful to the athletes. Basing this argument of several ethical theories, the argument drugs should be forbidden in sports may or may not be justified. This paper will use several ethical theories as the bases of the pro and con arguments and conclude with a reason for supporting either a pro or a con argument. Performance enhancing drugs should be banned in athletics because fairness in sports is what most people want.

There are on average 52,404 deaths in the US each year.This should be eye awakening, but yet the government doesn’t care. Required drug screenings would help lower the use of drugs. Senator David Vitter argues, “Requiring screenings would give addicts a key incentive to seek help so that they can once again be healthy, support their own families, and make positive contributions to our society”(Welfare drug testing 2). If people are truly concerned about getting the help they need, welfare, than they need to be serious enough to get help from drugs. Druggies are getting free food and free everything else but yet are contributing nothing to society.

The restrictions have their purpose to prevent people from misusing taxpayers money. Electronic benefit transfer or EBT for short is how people receive assistance while being on welfare. These EBT cards can be used at ATM to get cash which can then be used to purchase alcohol, tobacco products, and lottery tickets instead food, shelter, clothing, and utilities ("Baran"). This exploit has angered many taxpayers. The taxpayers are pressuring the government to do something about this misuse of welfare.

The world we portray by calling addiction a disease is one that supports an untrue fact, one in which you can 't be an addiction on your own. Taking a away your own will power is half the battle. This epidemic has to stop “23.5 million Americans are addicted to alcohol and or drugs” The government 's role should not condone that the is a disease because that will encourage this number to stay the same instead of

The increase in the number of diseases in America is becoming problematic due to religious reasoning to not receive vaccinations. This is creating a problem in society because there are some that are not being treated for these diseases and since they aren 't being treated for it, they put others at a large risk of getting the diseases. The parents that choose to not have their child/children vaccination are making it unfair to their child and other children. If someone isn 't vaccinated then they are putting all in society at risk since they aren 't vaccinated. There has been a large increase in the number of cases of measles from 2010-2017.

According to the Baltimore Sun, "Only 20% of doctors have shown to only provide opioids. However, hospitals have changed the approach to pain management but still haven 't made a change. More hospitals still provide opioids to patients with the dependence on the drug. Overall, the opioid addiction represents a serious issue in American society. The best solution in decreasing the number of overdoses is the low dosages of opioids provided by hospitals and doctors.

However, the political promise of response is far-fetched. America urgently needs a drug policy reform because the current policies are failing. An ideal drug reform law is one that is grounded in evidence-based research and health and safety concerns. Dr. Carl Hart has spent almost his entire career studying the effects of drug use on the brain. According to Hart, adopting a fear-based approach to counter substance abuse and addiction is misleading and often results in a excess of other harmful effects.