Since the NCAA was founded in 1906 college athletics have always been different, there was now an organization that would keep college athletics in check. Student-athletes are the key to college sports and most colleges as well as NCAA profits which is why they should be paid. These athletes put the majority of their time and effort into sports in addition to getting an education, but the revenue alone should be able to pay off the athlete. The argument is that there should be a difference between professionals and collegiate athletes. And, not all colleges make enough money from sports to be able to pay all their athletes. Recently, the rules have changed though and NIL deals are now allowed to be accepted for all collegiate athletes. For …show more content…
Think of the dozen other broadcasted college sports and how much combined that might be. Undoubtedly the most popular sport, both professional and collegiate, is football in America, with hundreds of games played all across the country it is also bound to bring in a good amount of revenue for the NCAA. It should be noted that this number was in the billions of dollars that the NCAA alone received, let alone colleges, broadcasting companies, sponsors, etc. “The major one is Coors Brewing Co., which has a $300,000 advertising package for scoreboard, radio, and TV advertising, plus a sign on the mascot's trailer. The school also named its basketball arena the Coors Event Center in return for a $5,000,000 donation.”(Eitzen, Stanley). That may now have been a deal in the billions, but it was a several million dollar “Donation”. Now, how can there be an argument about whether or not college athletes should be paid when there are less than a million D1 athletes, where most of the money comes from, in America? On the contrary, these athletes have a coaching staff that trains them to compete at the highest level so it is not only the players themselves that need to be paid. However, most college coaches do have a pretty hefty salary, for example “Nine football coaches will be paid at least $1,000,000 in overall compensation in 2000…”(Eitzen, Stanley). To summarize, the NCAA makes plenty of money to not allow student-athletes to be paid in some
Why College Athletes should not get Paid Wouldn't you want your college to be a fair place? College athletes are not paid because fans could lose interest if the players had been expert athletes. Paying all college athletes involves a number of tough enterprises and money, so for universities to be an awesome and fair region for all students colleges generally choose to now not to pay college athletes. College athletes need to know not to be paid because these athletes chose to be athletes, and also no one has sufficient money to pay everyone, so there could now not be any equality, however, some argue that athletes spend all their time and don’t get what they deserve returned. Different programs within the college could be erased if college athletes receive a commission consistent with maryville.edu “athletes will diminish the spirit of amateurism” this means that if students get a possibility to receive a commission at college they may never need to pick some other class which can have an effect on their future.
Injustice Case for NCAA Players NCAA athletes should be compensated due to their devotion towards extra-curricular schooling along with recreational activities. In the Huffington Post, economist convey that NCAA schools can definitely afford to pay college athletes. Spokeswoman Meghan Durham asserts that only 20 of the approximate 1,100 schools which constitute the NCAA make more from sports than they spend on sports, according to association’s most recent estimates. Rodney Fort, former sports economists…exposes that the money is already there since the NCAA brought about a billion dollars in revenue in its most recent financial year and top tier athletic programs regularly bring in tens of millions of dollars as well. Opponents stated that
But, on the other hand, people believe that college athletes have the right to be paid. They should get paid in some form, to help them financially, to pay their bills whether it be
The reasons why college athletes don't get paid when they are in college sports is because the coaches don't think the athletes won't get that much of recognized in the world and that's leaves them to find ways to get money and it can lead them to
Alabama University makes $81,993,762 just from football. The University makes $77,010,500 from non-athletic students. The football program makes more money than the actual university! Without the
According to Smith, "Paying college athletes would fundamentally change college sports and undermine the principles of amateurism and fair competition that they are built upon. "(Smith) He argues that college athletes are already receiving valuable benefits and paying them would create an unfair advantage for certain programs and lead to a decline in the quality of college sports. " The NCAA is already facing issues with competitive balance between schools, and paying players would only exacerbate those issues,"(Smith) he adds. Additionally, the article points out that "paying college athletes would raise questions about how much they should be paid, and whether or not they should be taxed.
Paying college athletes is something most athletes would enjoy, and most don 't realize how valuable they are to these universities. The NCAA has growing into a multi billion dollar industry. Athletes cannot, however receive any cut from their jersey sales,ticket sales nor the $10.8 billion broadcast deal NCAA just signed. No wonder why there such a big argument going on whether student athletes should get paid. At least they receive something which is an athletic scholarship, that covers their room and board ,tuition and fees, and books.
Many people know or have heard about these college programs getting all of this money and that’s not what the viewers paid for they paid to watch the game and watch their favorite players play and not to see these programs get all of this money for no reason. This is an issue because the viewers are getting ripped off of their money and the revenue that the programs get goes to nothing good for the players only, the university. In the article “College Players Should Be Paid, the author Scott Polacek stated, “College athletes should be paid because some of the players struggle with finances and a player at ole miss university was struggling to get food for himself”(Polacek). The evidence shown proves that college programs get money for doing minimal work. This is unfair to the athletes because they work so hard and dedicate themselves to their sport and all the coaches do is teach them what to do and all the program does is collect the money that the athletes work for.
Throughout the past few years, countless arguments have been made regarding if college athletes should get paid. Dismissing the Name, Image, and Likeness deal (NIL) and how athletes receive compensation for that matter, they do not obtain money like a salary. Despite the fact that the athletes are the ones who agree to continue their sport at an advanced level with the knowledge of no pay, they should at least gain a slight amount of income before, during, and after their season. These athletes play for the NCAA, National College Athletic Association, and they draw in a great deal of revenue, but do not acquire the same in return along with their effort, drive, and enthusiasm. Being a college athlete is predominantly a full-time job, so if
Organizations want to continue to control the exploitation of athletes for their own benefit. Student athletes will want to work more and perform better if you pay them a portion of what they contribute to college sports programs. Student athletes will work more during practices and games, just like you would if you were working a job for which you were paid. One of the reasons why college athletes aren't getting paid is because of the guidelines that are meant to protect the athletes status as students. The NCAA believes that if they start paying college athletes then fans would lose interest if they were watching professional athletes.
Not only are there other programs, but colleges also focus too much on education. Most athletes have a goal and colleges stir them in a different direction for education. In the article it says, “I believe it’s time for the N.C.A.A. to stop pretending that education is its top priority and pay college athletes” (Thompson par. 1). Top recruits go to those big colleges only for the recognition.
College athletes deserve to be paid because they are the only ones not being paid in the college sports industry. The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) generates eleven billion dollars annually, some of which could, and should go to college athletes. “USA Today reported last year just how much money the top 10 coaches in college football made. Nick Saban from Alabama topped the list earning roughly $5.5 million in 2013 alone” (Seibold). The coaches are making millions of dollars and the players aren’t.
It includes only those funds that end up in the NCAA 's bank account.” The FCAA being the organization that would collect and distribute the capital. This research paper described why college athletes should be paid. They make personal sacrifices, and take risks in order to produce revenue for their schools.
Some say student-athletes deserve to be paid for their effort while playing, this is because the NCAA over-profits student success. It takes $1.6 billion in revenue to distribute unfairly to the coaches and themselves instead of giving back to more scholarships they can give it back to the players earning that money. The truth is that scholarships are fair financial trade. According
Currently, athletes “...are not paid by their colleges or universities,