College athletes getting paid why or why not
According to an ESPN reporter Hensley, “Wallace said he typically had $180 each month after he paid his bills”. This quote shows that college programs have enough money to pay college athletes, they just decide not to because the university gets all of the revenue, while they only allow the players to play at their school. Oddly the athletes do all of the hard work and put their bodies on the line.These athletes fight threw injuries every day to become better. This is an issue because college players don’t know how their future will end up. With a good college program that pays student-athletes for what they do and a good coach who teaches, this can change their future for the better. College programs
…show more content…
Many people know or have heard about these college programs getting all of this money and that’s not what the viewers paid for they paid to watch the game and watch their favorite players play and not to see these programs get all of this money for no reason. This is an issue because the viewers are getting ripped off of their money and the revenue that the programs get goes to nothing good for the players only, the university. In the article “College Players Should Be Paid, the author Scott Polacek stated, “College athletes should be paid because some of the players struggle with finances and a player at ole miss university was struggling to get food for himself”(Polacek). The evidence shown proves that college programs get money for doing minimal work. This is unfair to the athletes because they work so hard and dedicate themselves to their sport and all the coaches do is teach them what to do and all the program does is collect the money that the athletes work for. This evidence proves my claim because the college athletes work so hard to earn a name for theirselves. They also work even harder to play at the top level of competition. According to ESPN, the price paid to “televise college football for the past 12 years was 7.3 billion dollars, the programs get that none of the players get that”. This evidence proves why these players …show more content…
College athletes can make profit off of their names, the program and all of the money they make and the athletes education this is why college athletes should be paid. College athletes should be able to make a profit off of their image and names and likeness because they don’t know what their future holds for them and honestly they could not have a future after college so the programs should pay them just so they don’t have to worry about everything. Another reason why college athletes shouldbe paid is because the programs they go to get alot of money after each game and each year, the athletic department of the NCAA made around 18.9 billions dollars and none of that goes to any of the players all of that goes to the coaching staff and the universites itself. Last reason why college athletes should be paid is because if they don’t get paid money they should at least get paid with a very high education from there universites and should graduate with something they can be grateful and happy about. Now go and tell people that college athletes should be paid for the sport they
Why College Athletes should not get Paid Wouldn't you want your college to be a fair place? College athletes are not paid because fans could lose interest if the players had been expert athletes. Paying all college athletes involves a number of tough enterprises and money, so for universities to be an awesome and fair region for all students colleges generally choose to now not to pay college athletes. College athletes need to know not to be paid because these athletes chose to be athletes, and also no one has sufficient money to pay everyone, so there could now not be any equality, however, some argue that athletes spend all their time and don’t get what they deserve returned. Different programs within the college could be erased if college athletes receive a commission consistent with maryville.edu “athletes will diminish the spirit of amateurism” this means that if students get a possibility to receive a commission at college they may never need to pick some other class which can have an effect on their future.
There has been a significant discussion in regards to whether collegiate athletes should or should not get paid while they are in school. Collegiate athletes all across the nation perform for their dedicated fan bases week in and week out. A lot goes into these marveled matchups that goes unseen. Hard work, dedication, blood, sweat, and tears are shed, yet you wouldn't know that if you're just a typical fan. These are a few of the things that these so called fans don't get to experience firsthand.
The reasons why college athletes don't get paid when they are in college sports is because the coaches don't think the athletes won't get that much of recognized in the world and that's leaves them to find ways to get money and it can lead them to
”(Eitzen, Stanley). That may now have been a deal in the billions, but it was a several million dollar “Donation”. Now, how can there be an argument about whether or not college athletes should be paid when there are less than a million D1 athletes, where most of the money comes from, in America? On the contrary, these athletes have a coaching staff that trains them to compete at the highest level so it is not only the players themselves that need to be paid. However, most college coaches do have a pretty hefty salary, for example “Nine football coaches will be paid at least $1,000,000 in overall compensation in 2000…”(Eitzen, Stanley).
It isn’t fair that College Athletes do so much yet receive so little for their hard work. The majority of college athletes receive scholarships to aid in their education, but they also require additional funding. College athletes should be paid for their hard work, like professional athletes are. These athletes don't have the time in their schedules to work additional jobs and support organizations that use their talent for profit. They should be compensated for the effort and risk they take when playing, after all.
As someone who was once a high school athlete, contemplating the decision to compete at the colligate level, I sympathize with those who feel taken advantage of. While many may think it is unfair, college athletes deserve to be paid
Should college athletes be paid? According to Hensley, Wallace said he typically had $180 each month after he paid his bills, This quote shows that college programs have enough money to pay college athletes they just decide not to because they get all the money and they do nothing but the players do everything they put their bodies on the line and they fight threw injuries every day to become better This is an issue because college players don’t know how their future will go or what they will be doing in their future but with a good program that pays them for what they do and a good coach who teaches them everything they will be good. College programs have the money to give out to players that's why they have all of these great places for
Over the past few years, the idea of paying college athletes has been a very hot and sought after topic to talk about. Many people desire and strive to one day be good enough at a sport that they can get a scholarship to continue their athletic careers. There has been many questions circulating in regards to if collegiate athletes should be paid to play for universities. Gaining an education and degree for cheaper than everyone else attending college should be more than enough to keep athletes playing for colleges. College athletes should not be paid to play their sport.
The money comes from T.V. contracts, merch sales, season pass ticket sales, and sponsorships, however college students don't get anything from that. College athletes put a lot of hard work and time into their sports and bring in money to the school in the ESPN article on if college athletes should be paid, Deion Sanders said “College athletes are workers” (Page 1.) This is important because it shows that these sports are like jobs to these students and they are making money for a company just to not get a penny of it. In addition, this is unfair to athletes who are instrumental in generating revenue, and they should be entitled to a portion of it. According to a 2018 report by Forbes, “The University Of Alabama football team alone generated $111 million dollars in revenue for the University; however the athletes who helped generate their revenue did not receive any compensation beyond their scholarship.”
Whether or not college athletes should be paid is not an easy question to answer as both sides of the argument have very valid claims. Most college students, especially those of whom are athletes, have extremely busy lives. It is also important to understand that athletes' main focus is sports, not academics. Athletes are not going to college to learn and earn a professional degree, but they are instead going there to pursue their goals in sports. College athletes should be paid after carefully considering financial and moral decisions such as the amount each athlete should get paid, how the athletes’ education will be affected, and what paying these people would mean for their futures.
In his March Madness interview, Mark Emmert, the head of the NCAA, states how it would be “utterly unacceptable…to convert students into employees” (PBS). There would also be little to no difference between college and professional sports, and would fail to preserve the “amateurism”, as valued by the NCAA. Emmert justified this principle by claiming that “college athletes can’t be paid for their labor or commercial use of their names, images…because such pay would be exploitative” (O’Bannon). This arbitrary line between how college athletes are paid compared to their coaches and their performance on the field does little to fully explain to the extent to which college athletes cannot profit off anything during their college careers. While college athletes receive virtually little to no compensation for their contributions to their sports, their coaches can make up to an average of $1.75 million dollars.
College athletes deserve to be paid because they are the only ones not being paid in the college sports industry. The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) generates eleven billion dollars annually, some of which could, and should go to college athletes. “USA Today reported last year just how much money the top 10 coaches in college football made. Nick Saban from Alabama topped the list earning roughly $5.5 million in 2013 alone” (Seibold). The coaches are making millions of dollars and the players aren’t.
Many people may argue that by paying college athletes it will take away from the sports themselves because the athletes will be only focused on the money. While making money from playing their respective sport will change certain aspects of the game, it will not make it less competitive or enjoyable to watch. The money that these young men and women will make will not change their competitiveness and love for the game, it will only ensure that they are able to make ends meet by providing themselves with necessities. College athletes put in countless hours towards their sport, and they deserve compensation in
If colleges began to pay their athletes, then they could build a bad reputation for being mercenary and lose their educational reputation If they are allowed to play, then it can be financially detrimental to the college because there are many flaws in the system. College athletes should not be compensated for their actions regarding athletic activities, no matter what sport or level they compete on. The idea that college athletes should or shouldn 't be paid
The million dollar question; should college athletes be paid? This is an immense debate, but if you were to ask me, I would say yes, college athletes should be paid. There are a plethora of reasons why college athletes should get paid. College athletes should get paid because of the amount of time they put into their sport, the amount of money everyone else is making off of them, and their overall importance to the school. There are a myriad of reasons that people can argue the opposite way, but, the reasons they should get paid definitely outweigh the reasons they shouldn’t get paid.