The Washington State Cougars “have lost 12 players to the [transfer] portal since the end of their regular season” because they’re unable to out-pay the other schools (Clark 2). When college athletes receive money for advertisements and endorsements because of their name, money outmatches some coaches that worked hard to recruit kids. College athletes should not be paid for their name, image, and likeness.
Every athlete's goal when going to play sports in college: make it to the pros. Why make college so similar to professional? In college football, “[m]ore than 1,500 players were in the transfer portal as of Tuesday” (Johnson 2). Entering the transfer portal can often be compared to free agency in the NFL or the NBA. Athletes leave their college and consider their options on where to further their education and athletic career. This is often when players can be offered deals and money to come play at a certain school. Some people believe it’s a “[f]lawed
…show more content…
Players are attracted by great coaches, which means the coaches are rewarded for being skilled, in the form of talented players. Traditionally, “coaches who are socially effective will be able to identify and leverage [recruits]” (Magnusen and Todd 14). When schools “[dangle] NIL packages in front of players”, the skilled and hardworking coaches lose the recruiting battle to money (Clark 2). NIL (name, image, and likeness), an acronym that represents money paid to current and incoming college athletes. Offering athletes money should not downgrade the great coaches when recruiting. If recruiting becomes a money war, the NCAA would split. If the school has loads of money, they will acquire multiple talented recruits. If they don’t have enough to afford athletes, they will be lucky to stay in Division 1. Great coaches should be able to leverage recruits because of their skill, not
Hala Warda Kristin McGregor English 90R 22 October 2015 Summary and Response#3: “College Athletes Should Be Paid” Ann Kaufmann’s article “College Athletes Should Be Paid” explains that because college football and men’s basketball programs are so profitable, the athletes who play them should be paid. One reason they should be paid is because they spend more time practicing than they study. For example, “college football and basketball players often spend upwards of 50 hours a week during the season at their sport” (452). Another reason is NCAA doesn’t allow players to accept any gifts money from anyone. For instance, the article states that “not surprising, college players are sometimes tempted to take money under the table” (452).
In recent years, larger universities with bigger budgets have been able to recruit the best athletes by offering better facilities, resources, and coaching staff. This has created an imbalance in college sports, with smaller schools struggling to compete with larger ones. By paying college athletes, smaller schools would have the opportunity to attract top talent and compete on a more level playing field. College athletes are often left without any representation when it comes to the rules and regulations that govern their sport. The NCAA has been criticized for being opaque and inconsistent in its decision-making, leaving college athletes without any say in the rules that govern their athletic pursuits.
The NCAA has made a profit on the careers of young college athletes across all sports for decades, with players being forbidden from earning money based on their name image and likeness up until 2 years ago. The NCAA needs to continue to allow college athletes to earn money based on their name image and likeness and it is the right thing to do based on recruiting strategies by coaches, players’ commitment to the sport, as well as the players’ background. The NCAA needs to continue to allow college athletes to earn money based on their name, image, and likeness, and it is the right thing to do based on recruiting strategies by coaches. New Colorado football head coach Deion Sanders recently said during an interview when asked about scouting defensive lineman “Defensive linemen, it’s totally opposite — single mama, trying to get it, he’s on free lunch…. I’m talking about just trying to make it.
College coaches for football make twice as much as the rest of the team; however basketball coaches make seven times as much as their team. College coaches do everything in their power to convince the best athletes to join their team. They have gone as far as to according to Dave Zirin, “Michigan sent a letter to the girlfriend of a player to try to convince her to try to convince him to come to Michigan.” This is just one of many instances wear coaches have crossed the line. Yet would it not have been easier to just tell the player you would offer them free school and money to play for them.
In the article, “The Billion Dollar Industry that Has Never Paid its Money-Makers: The NCAA’s Attempt at Compensation Through Names, Images and Likeness” by law school graduate from Pennsylvania State University and Touro College, Christopher Palmieri, touches on the resemblance of student-athletes to professional athletes. He states, “Apparel deals, ticket sales, and school reputations have made it so that some college games have over one billion dollars at play when student-athletes gear up. Despite this, the NCAA still prevented all college athletes from making a single cent from their own popularity without facing serious repercussions. … The plaintiffs argue that it is unjust for the universities, apparel companies, and many others to profit from the hard work of these athletes without allowing them to earn money for themselves” (Palmieri 1607). These athletes give up so much of their time and work so hard, both physically and mentally, to only be rewarded with cheers and praises.
Since Colleges come with additional expenses not covered by a scholarship, it only makes sense for these athletes to get paid so they have a way to pay these
As someone who was once a high school athlete, contemplating the decision to compete at the colligate level, I sympathize with those who feel taken advantage of. While many may think it is unfair, college athletes deserve to be paid
According to statistics, Division 1 basketball players are worth "about $170,000 or more per year to the schools they attend because of the money their sport earns" (Source 2, paragraph 14). This clearly shows that college athletics are a major player in overall college funding, and that just the elimination of this source of funding to a college will have extremely detrimental effects, let alone spending funds to pay the players a portion of that amount. Additionally, this can be further elaborated on with the consideration of an excerpt from Source 3, paragraph 23, in which it states that at the moment, basketball and football are the only two sports that have the potential to generate income for a college, and consequently, "smaller colleges that do not have basketball or football teams would have no money to pay their athletes in other sports" and that colleges "would be forced to cut other sports" because of this. This is most definitely not ideal for any college, as the cutting of athletics would not be beneficial to the student population or the institution itself, since this consequence would decrease the amount of diversity in athletic options students have, overemphasize football and basketball programs, and even act as a detriment to future applicants for the college because of this. Yet, in spite of this, some criticize this viewpoint, and argue that the financial gain from paid athletes representing other sports, such as gymnastics could allow for representation, which would, in theory, allow the students to advocate for their sport and maintain funding for it.
Another reason is that it does not help with the balance of different sports, if a college only focuses on the football team, the baseball team that is not as good will not have enough money to pay for some things, recruit some players and the sport and fame of the college will eventually die, all of these reasons make sense and I agree with but college athletes should be paid just not as
In his March Madness interview, Mark Emmert, the head of the NCAA, states how it would be “utterly unacceptable…to convert students into employees” (PBS). There would also be little to no difference between college and professional sports, and would fail to preserve the “amateurism”, as valued by the NCAA. Emmert justified this principle by claiming that “college athletes can’t be paid for their labor or commercial use of their names, images…because such pay would be exploitative” (O’Bannon). This arbitrary line between how college athletes are paid compared to their coaches and their performance on the field does little to fully explain to the extent to which college athletes cannot profit off anything during their college careers. While college athletes receive virtually little to no compensation for their contributions to their sports, their coaches can make up to an average of $1.75 million dollars.
This shows how cruel and greedy colleges are to the people making the money for them. Another reality is that college athletics generate billions of dollars every year, and everyone wants a piece of the action. Everyone, that is, except the players.” To conclude, this shows why college athletes should get just a little portion of the money they make for the colleges because it will affect how they play in a very positive
Already, the system of college athletics is corrupt. People see that all this money is being made and the college athletes are completely getting
NIL contracts are a great way for athletes to get noticed by professional leagues like the NBA. There are many instances of athletes getting recognized from their sponsorships. When Overtime Elite presented the opportunity to a group of student-athletes, they “jumped at the rare opportunity” in the hope that it will help with “making an even bigger leap to the NBA” (Huddleston 1). This means that student-athletes have an opportunity to make a bigger name for themselves and have a better chance at competing in professional sports. Players with NIL deals can get even more recognition through social media pages run by their sponsors.
Mike says”Students all over the world work hard at the sport that true love and don’t get a lot in return for it”. While college athletes may not exactly be employees, they are more than just students. Consider the life of a student-athlete, though. The average Division I football player dedicates over 43hours per week to his sport, meaning that he spends more than a typical American work-week training and playing football, in addition to his class work. Their work, which generates exorbitant amounts of money year in and year out, deserves Compensation.
While in some scenarios, a free transfer without eligibility consequences is rightly deserved and helpful to athletes, it should not be the default rule governing all athletes who decide to transfer. The NCAA simply made it too easy to transfer and the rule encourages kids to leave schools in search of greener grass or avoid adversity. The rule takes away from the necessity of picking the right school and making sure that it is the best place for your future. I understand the appeal of transferring and I have firsthand experience as a transfer myself. Everyone hears the stories about those who transfer, and it works out perfectly in terms of more playing time, scholarship money, or better location.