Argumentative Essay: Should Tobacco Be Banned? Name Instructor Institution Course Date Should Tobacco Be Banned According to the existing statistics, the greatest proportion of the world’s population does not smoke tobacco. As noted in the United States of America, only one out of four adults smoke. In Kenya, it is estimated that one of every five teenagers smoke. It has also been established that that most people start smoking at the age between 12 and 14, in addition to the fact that 1
The topic of this controversial essay will be about is the legalization of marijuana. I will be advocating for the legalization of marijuana. The legalization of marijuana is so controversial because it was outlawed in the past, but now people are discovering new things it could do and wish to have it legalized once again. The legalization of marijuana can offer medical benefits, generate a lot of tax money, and decreases prisoner space. The legalization of marijuana can offer many health benefits
Introduction A cylindrical tobacco roll that according to the smokers is a way to deal with their stress including, work to be the major cause. Considering the smoker’s point of view, smoking should then be able to reduce the stress, while data show a different scenario. Hook “United States of America alone accounts for nearly 480,000 deaths every year, which also includes the death of passive smokers and the number is over 41,000. Non-smokers live 10 years more than a regular smoker”. Irrespective
consider it as an intrusion into personal choice as the government tries to intervene into private affairs. Besides that, people consider it to be a human rights violation. However, there are still positive sides to government intervention and this essay aims to examine whether government intervention in private affairs is always undesirable. Firstly, many New Yorkers view and consider this ban as an invasion into personal choice, rights and decision. The
the Katib Chelebi’s last work which he completed in 1656. It consists of several essays about the controversial topics of Islamic doctrine in that times. In his work it is important to figure out that he preferred to stay between the two sides, which were Qadızadelis and Halvetis, of the debates of the seventeenth century. He claimed that such debates and conflicts are meaningless and futile and intelligent man should notice that and not be in either side. In his work, Katib Chelebi was not afraid
Due to this, most sources I encountered were heavily biased towards this interpretation, and it was difficult to find sources to counteract this. I would therefore recommend that research should have been conducted into an issue that is not commonly perceived to have such a one-sided solution, but that is openly debated from both sides. Due to these limitations, it is clear that this issue requires a much more in-depth analysis than what