The main job of the inspection division is, “to ensure that the safety of the general public is maintained”, and extraditing him to the US is the only way to guarantee him from not escaping and the safety of the US. Even with these high security prisons, El Chapo has found ways to work around them and bribe police officers and officials. In a recent study, “Of the more than 1,000 Mexicans who responded to a 2013 survey from Transparency International, 90% said police were corrupt or extremely corrupt, and 80% felt the same way about the country 's judiciary.” This shows that the officials in Mexico are easily swayed and we cannot trust those overseeing El Chapo’s sentence. His cartel is the biggest supplier of heroin and cocaine in the US, and is convicted of federal trafficking and organized crime; therefore he can be legally tried and imprisoned in the United States. A Mexican official court said that if he were caught again, he would be extradited to the US.
Reasons such as these exemplify the need for the death penalty and why it is beneficial in America. For decades, Americans have relied on capital punishment to prevent serial killers and other criminals from committing heinous crimes.
Lipset (1997, p.26) expresses American exceptionalism as “a two-edged phenomenon” in U.S. domestic politics; and the same applies to foreign policy. As national identity, American exceptionalism explains U.S. foreign policy and policy-making throughout its history (Restad, 2012). Accordingly, it has appeared in political arguments in various ways; not a few previous presidents had explicitly or implicitly expressed their belief in American exceptionalism. Ronald Reagan’s belief in ‘a shining city on a Hill’ based on a bible and “the last best hope of man on earth” are one of the most famous examples (Reagan, cited in Davis and Lynn-Jones, 1987, p.21). People might speak out American exceptionalism only because they believe in it, however, when
About Drug Watch:ssss For the past 50 years, an international coalition has waged what United States President Richard Nixon once dubbed the “War on Drugs.” Since the 1961 Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs—and even dating back to coordinated efforts initiated under the umbrella of the League of Nations—the international community has taken an unequivocal stance against the production, sale, and distribution of narcotic drugs. And yet, half a century later, the problems of drug trafficking, drug abuse, Narcoterrorism, and a multitude of others relating to the drug trade abound. Indeed, a 2011 report from the Global Commission on Drug Policy found, “The global war on drugs has failed, with devastating consequences for individuals and societies
(Bilton, 2013) Surveillance of search engines permits information to be monitored so that if any hazardous search word like how to make bomb is looked it up several times by someone then it can be identified (Anon, 2014). Also, watching over the public assists police to capture crime suspects so that government organizations can protect national security (mass surveillance 위키피디아) To be specific, after terrible incident occurred in September 11, 2001, government of United States enacted the Patriot Act which stands for Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001. The act was signed by President George W. Bush on October 26, 2001 in the name of declaring war with terrorism. (위키피디아) The law grants the right to Federal Bureau of Investigation to profile people who fit certain stereotypes so that potential crime and potential terror can be prevented.
Decapitating of the leaders, or the killing, arrest or capturing of the leaders of terrorist organisations, has become an essential feature of United State’s counterterrorism policy design. Many scholars and analysts claim that it weakens terrorist organisations and reduces the threat they pose. Unsurprisingly, the killing of Osama bin Laden on May 2, 2011, in Abbottabad, Pakistan, has proved to be a major tactical victory for President Barack Obama and specially for the war on terrorism. Despite the success of this operation and successive attacks on al-Qaida leaders, decapitation is unlikely to lessen the ability of al-Qaida to continue its terrorism in the long run. Rather, it may have counterproductive consequences, fortifying or nourishing the
For the past decade, democracies have been idealized as the superior political system, especially by the Western world and therefore lack ambition to improve. Since the tensions between non-democratic and democratic states have disappeared after the fall of most communist countries, the “West” and democracy was perceived as the superior, “winning” ideology. In my opinion, this perception has led to an irrational respect as well as blind obedience to political leaders. Therefore free hand is given to democratic states and their leaders as they find world-wide support. Whistle-blowers, leaking secret information about unethical actions of governments and organizations, are modern “institutions” setting necessary limits to the actions of political actors in the western world.
Understanding this can lead to a fundamentally sound policy and counter-tactic to actively curb the use of terrorism. Terrorism is a response. A response to what? Since people using the tactic of terrorism are rational what conditions allow for such tactics to thrive? This leads to a fundamental United States security question why do organizations conducting terror tactics garner so many recruits?
In addition, this concept defines the fact that the states in anarchical system could not let their national interests left behind and thus their national survival endangered. They must fight and struggle for the better. Regarding its definition, the government of each state must seek the resolution to protect their population from aggression. According to US invasion in Iraq, the US claimed Saddam Hussein obtained weapons of mass destruction (WMD) and was close to achieving nuclear capabilities, which was believed to be a national security threat to the US (Riley, 2008), hence, the US used its military superiority to topple Saddam’s regime. As a result, in 1991 the UN and the international community came to support Kuwait, which had been invaded by Iraq, yet in 2003 the US unilaterally invaded Iraq and the UN was unable to stop the invasion.
That’s all mam. Have you ever heard the war on drugs? Do you think it is effective? For me, in my opinion we have been fighting this war for decades and I think we are actually failing rather than succeeding however this is my opinion so ladies and gentlemen here I am in front of all of you to discuss the war on drugs; what is war on drugs? The war on drugs is an American term commonly applied to a campaign of prohibition of drugs, military aid, and military intervention, with the stated aim being to reduce the illegal drug trade.