Equally important, is the matters in which both the Young Offenders Act and the youth Criminal justice Act, Aid Young offenders that are trying to reintegrate into society after being released. This matter can prove to be very important to the courts due to simply to the fact that if there is a higher and the most successful rate of offender reintegration in Canada, there will be a significant decrease in the yearly youth crime statistic because of the fewer amounts of youth re-offenders. According to the Department of justice Canada( 2009), “Under the YOA, a young person can be released from custody with no required supervision and support to assist the young person in making the transition back to his or her community”( Custody and Reintegration). With these findings, we can clearly conclude that although these young people were capable re-attaining their freedoms, many of Canada’s youths would have …show more content…
Although the Youth Offender Act contained many sentencing options, the Youth Criminal justice Act contained many new provisions and much more concise detail and instructions on the options that were already in effect. The improvements made in the YCJA lead to a better understanding of the differences between a non-violent crime and non-severe crime and violent or severe crime, these terms very important because sentencing has influenced these factors. To demonstrate the importance of these terms and how severe the sentencing was under the Yong Offenders Act, when the Department of justice released the Youth Criminal Justice Act: Summary and Background (2009), they stated that under the effect of the YOA: “The youth incarceration rate is higher than the adult incarceration rate in Canada” (Youth Sentences). This information is a Clear demonstration of how important the Youth Criminal Justice Act has become for
IS THE YOUTH CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT TOO LENIENT ON YOUTHS? The Youth Criminal Justice Act is the federal legislation that replaced the young offenders act in 2003. The Department of Justice defines the act by stating: It is the law that governs the Canadian youth justice systems. It applies to youth who are at least 12 years old but under the age of 18, who are alleged to have committed criminal offences. The three main topics in which I believe to be most crucial that relates to the Youth Criminal Justice Act include, how much time a youth must serve based on the degree of the crime especially when the crime committed was well planned out, the severity of the ruling based on a re-offence,
However, when emphasizing on the main theme of the devastation felt by the victims during the incarceration of the kids in the “kids for cash” scandal, the author juxtaposes repeatedly the victimized “good kids” with the “bad kids” that awaited them in the juvenile detention centers. Ecenbarger wrote that some girls were tough at the camp and were teenagers from the inner city convicted for violent crimes. However, others were also in the detention camp for stealing the credit cards of the fathers to purchase clothes and for bringing pocket knives unintentionally to school (Ecenbarger, 2012, p.9). Similarly, the author wrote that “there was no sinister gang that inspired Paige who is fifteen years old to throw a sandal to her mother when they had an argument…Paige did not understand why she was being interned at the detention camp with
The YCJA has specific guidelines and boundaries on the sentencing of young offenders compared to the adult sentencing requirements in the Criminal Code of Canada, which deals strictly with people age 18 up. When a young person is held in custody under a youth sentence under the YCJA, the court director can, if persuaded that the needs of the individual and the community would be better met by doing so, make a suggestion to the youth justice court that the young person be released from custody and placed under probation supervision. If the crime is extreme enough, the offender may face an adult sentence, which includes, adult court, adult jail time, and adult charges. If Trevor were charged under the Criminal code of canada, for ages 18 and up, the maximum jail time Trevor could possibly face is a life sentence with a 25-year parole exclusive period. There is no death penalty in Canada.
The Youth Criminal Justice Act (YCJA) serves as the legislative cornerstone for Canada's juvenile justice system. Governments, police, attorneys, judges, and others are collaborating closely with communities and families across the nation to prevent youth crime and guarantee a just and efficient juvenile justice system. According to the Canadian Constitution, the administration of the criminal justice system is the provinces' and territories' responsibility. Although the federal government is in charge of criminal law, including legislation pertaining to youth justice, For many people, particularly young individuals, mistakes are common. The process of their growth and maturity could potentially lead them to make unthinking decisions at such
A huge way in which the YCJA promotes equity is through its main focus on rehabilitation rather than just the punishment of the child. A study from Justice Canada found that the YCJA’s focus on rehabilitation has led to a significant drop in the rate of re-offenses among youth offenders proving that through rehabilitation, the youth are more likely not to re-offend, resulting in not returning back to the justice system (Justice Canada). To add onto that, the YCJA has created specialized courts for youth to better meet the unique needs of the
The literature that has been reviewed directly incorporates the principles set out in Goldson and Muncie “Youth Justice with Integrity”. The analysis of the current justice model attempts to maximize diversion by providing more offences available for extrajudicial measures and the use of measures for re-offenders. Additionally, it is argued that the de-politicization of the youth justice model will help the integrity by providing effective programs and services that will address the social needs of specific individuals within the available resources in the community. The programs and services that are being used are effective, but there are areas of improvement for greater prevention strategies which will hold a person more accountable for
In response to the concerns of having one of the highest youth incarceration rates in the world in the late 1990s, Canada introduced the Youth Criminal Justice Act (YCJA) to counteract the high incarceration rates and to put an emphasis on extra-judicial measures (EJMs) to deter youth from the criminal justice system. While the YCJA has shown success, and to have strike a balance that the Act’s predecessors were lacking, it still has underlying issues. Youth whom are most vulnerable, such as those with mental illness, homeless, abused or in poverty are most susceptible to getting involved in the youth criminal system. According to the More Less Court report by the Office of the Child and Youth Advocate, the province of New Brunswick has been
One of the core principles of the YCJA is that each young person is viewed as an individual and is entitled to have their uinque circumstances taken into account when they come in contact with the law. This means that the YCJA recongnizes that young people who come in conflict with the law are not neccessarily criminals but may be dealing with various issues, including family problems, mental health issues, substance abuse, and other relevant factors. For example, as it states on the Crime Prevention website, “http://www.ccsd.ca/resources/CrimePrevention/index.htm” . As a result, the YCJA focuses on the importance of reintegration and rehabilitation rather than punishment. Overall the YCJA is based on the idea that young people are still developing and have the potential to change their behavior.
Retrieved from https://www.police.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/508315/COCE_113782_01_Dec_14.pdf. Cunneen, C., White, R., & Richards, K. (2013). Juvenile justice: youth and crime in australia. Retrieved from EBook Central.
Youth crime is one of the most prevalent, ongoing issues within Canadian society. Beginning predominantly in the 1960s with the baby boomers and reaching dangerous levels with the crime spike leading into the 21st century, adolescent crime has become a topic of strong interest. Over time, multiple methods have been implemented to eliminate these young offenders. Although large strides have been made in reducing the amount of crime among Canadian minors, the nation is still burdened by this serious matter. In 2014, Allen and Superle (2016) found that 13% of all people accused of crime were Canadian youth.
Today we are going to be talking about the Youth Criminal Justice Act aka (YCJA) and all of its pros and cons. In social we are deciding about the YCJA and if it is fair and equitable. Pros of the YCJA are that it brings a line to the criminal justice system and it helps youth not get a criminal record. Cons of the YCJA is that it's ineffective and doesn't really stop youth from committing the crime and it makes youth think that they have a free pass or a slap on the wrist. What I think about the YCJA, that it’s a waste of money on taxpayers, government and that it is ineffective because youth still commit the same crimes over and over again.
It is vitally important to ensure the rights of youth offender, it is also crucial to secure the supremacy of rights and freedoms of all canadian which is entrenched in the charter of rights and freedom the the canadian
There are differences between a juvenile court and criminal court in the United States. The focus of the juvenile justice system is on rehabilitation, in hope of deterring the minor away from a life of crime so they will not commit a crime again as an adult. In contrast, the criminal justice system focuses on the punishment and often bases the sentencing outcome on the criminal history of the youth. In a study conducted, Butler (2011) showed that the participants’ experience with adult jails and prisons show that those facilities may instill fear but are otherwise emotionally—and often physically—dangerous for youth. Many of the adult prisoners, who were minors when they enter the adult institution, felt they were forced to “grow
Within the urban communities, negative perceptions are magnified. Adolescents are more prone to be a product of their environment, especially those whose parents are incarcerated. Because of this trend adolescents are being incarcerated at an alarming rate and sentenced to adult facilities. Lambie & Randall (2013) states, the United States have imposed harsher penalties on serious young offenders, and have consequently increased rates of incarcerated youth and made it easier for youth to be treated and incarcerated as adults within the justice
As business dictionary simply explains, power is an authority held by a group within a society, whereas society is a group of people sharing the same norms, values, culture and identity. However, youth society is a little bit different from adulthood and have different rules and norms when we talk about authority and by who it is being held. Power is established by Government, however as Tim Newburn stated in his article police is a first line of contact with young offenders. Everything what happens in the youth justice system hinge on set of decisions taken earlier by the police. They use different types of controlling juvenile offenders such as reprimands, final warnings and stop and search.