Essay Pros And Cons Of Gentrification

Zone A was the inner areas of the cities where business and cultural activities take place 2. Zone B was the area that was considered for immigrants and poor individuals 3. Zone C was for the working class 4. Zone D was for wealthier homes and shopping centers 5. Zone E was the suburbs and for the estates of the wealthy   Burgess 's model is considered outdated by some for various reasons including the fact that this model cannot always hold true, moreover, it is based on a period of time when American cities were growing at a fast rate.

And that success story has put pressure on our housing stock. Coupled with ever-rising economic inequality, it has created a painful reality where more and more New Yorkers are spending more and more to cover their housing costs, and entire neighborhoods have lost their affordability…”(Nyc.gov, Mayor De’Blasio) The Mayor De Blasio Housing plan is to build affordable housing across the city providing 200,000 affordable housing units across the city. Shout out to Mayor Bill De Blasio for trying to bring everyone together into one big happy family. Where everyone will be able to afford housing and no one will have to blame the white people anymore... Looks like someone has been token tips from Oprah “You get an affordable house, you get a house, and you get a house. EVERYONE GETS A HOUSE!!!

What is gentrification? Gentrification to me is nothing more than a system that robs the locals of their neighborhood by changing what made the neighborhood unique in order to turn a profit and make it a more desirable place to live. It is easily recognizable by the amount of construction occurring and the remodeling of homes, stores parks etc. this is commonly seen in low-income neighborhoods because it has a great starting ground. In order to attract more upper-class citizens, a legion of buildings is built that are usually expensive and caters to individuals of that class.

To begin with, throughout the years of 1945 and 1985 there has been a large change within the demographics in suburbanization. The cause of this major change was the rize of the upper middle class and the returning veterans of World War II. More people began to get higher educations in return they would get higher wages than the lower class. The people who started to getting payed more started to move down to the suburbs because they no longer wanted to live in the ugly ghettos where the lower

It is no longer perceived that homelessness is a problem of the substance abuser, idle, and mentally ill. Homelessness in Cleveland has been greatly affected by several factors that were resulted from severe economic and social situations. A particularly important factor is the lack of affordable housing and the economic situations that influenced the implementation of programs and policies intended to combat the social illness. As the number of the homeless increases, so does the causes of today’s

Between the stevedores, young black male drug dealers, and new immigrants, there is an almost line of succession that corresponds to criminal behavior. In many cities, when new ethnic groups arrive, they live in the poorest neighborhoods, often closest to the central city. Almost all of these new immigrant groups resort to criminal behavior as a means to make money in a new city at a disadvantage. As these ethnic groups make money, and as newer and poorer ethnic groups immigrate in, the older ethnic groups begin to move to better neighborhoods and find more legitimate work, as the new ethnic groups take their place. We see this with the stevedores like Frank, who don’t want to partake in criminal activity and are trying to thrive in legal blue-collar jobs, and young black drug dealers, who are still breaking the law but are beginning to try to exit the mold of criminals, which we can see in Stringer Bell taking courses to run the drug dealing operation like a “true business”.

Gentrification is a fast growing process in most cities today. Displacement through gentrification has many side effects for low-income families. Gentrification is a major problem; it is the displacement of people of lower socioeconomic status and replacing them with people of higher economic status, raising the property rates on these gentrified properties so that the lower classes can no longer afford to live there and further creating social inequality among the citizens of our community. We take broken parts of town and convert them into lavish attractions for visitors and natives. These so-called broken parts of town have residents who can no longer afford to live in these parts.

I agree that cities are in some ways a violation of public spaces and that they create and encourage segregation. Look at University City for instance, the area predominantly surrounding Drexel University. This area was once home to native Philadelphians who due to economic gain for the city government and the university, basically drove them out. Rent skyrocketed to a point where most of these regular folks cannot even afford it. Look at image 11.

Oklahoma City is a growing and vibrant place we are starting to get many tourists, building more schools and getting several sports teams. The homeless population can take away from the beautiful sights in Oklahoma City and it needs to be fixed. When people are looking for houses and businesses in Oklahoma they do a lot of research, people do not want to start a family or a business in an area filled with homeless people hanging around all day because it makes them feel unsafe. Plus, it makes it seem as though it is a rough area with a lot of crime. Often times people will associate homeless population with crime rates even though the crime rate does not necessarily go up to the homeless presence in the area.

People depended on income for many reasons and just as they were trapped with their jobs they are also trapped with the need to earn money it was one of the reasons they left their homelands and traveled to America to earn lots of money and become rich. The city was not a pleasant place to resign there was not many options as to where you could live. Many immigrants were traveling to the city for employment this lead to “overcrowding, pollution, and poor housing” (lecture 9/8/15). There was so many people trying to live in the same location so there was houses filled with lots of people the freedom to live alone was a possibility that you could obtain if you could afford it. One could purchase a house of their own, but with it came the trap that was the fear of losing the home and dealing it’s overwhelming debt.

Adding stores or more attraction to Alpena would help to bring in more money to our city. Being involved in your community and being a change that people want to see is fantastic and allows the place we call home to grow. Instead of waiting for someone to be the change, make that person who’s making the change be you. You should do more volunteering, more activities to meet new people, and so much more. Not every city or state is going to be perfect but it’s always worth a

Everyone will see a piece of art differently and people will come to the terms that not every citizen will appreciate or have the same perspective on the sculpture that your are about to put in the center of town. According to an editorial Art for Art’s Sake: The case for government funding against art, the unemployment rate in the nation is high, which not only does other cities account for the increasing rate of unemployment but so does our very own. Therefore, using the city should be using their funds to help people’s lives transforming it for the good. I believe so because what good is a city if their aesthetics increases but the citizens lives slowly crumbles away from the lack of a job or even a home to live in. Furthermore, the editorial states that “Art is, by its very nature, expressive and controversial.

Urban renewal and gentrification are two terms used to define the rebuilding and/or restructuring of “dilapidated neighborhoods into flourishing (and more economically valuable) urban spaces…” (Book, P.447). However, urban renewal and gentrification can have negative impacts on the lower class, and lower-middle class citizens, which reside within the communities being redeveloped by increased rent to even forceful eviction. However, to fully understand this topic, urban renewal and gentrification need to be defined, and determined how it effects the economy and citizens, understood how urban renewal can be balanced with the needs of the citizens, and demonstrated how urban renewal has effected the District of Columbia. Urban renewal is defined as “the transformation of old neighborhoods with new buildings, businesses, and residences,” and this phenomenon has both positive and negative effects on any community (Book, P.447). Consequently, urban renewal is linked to gentrification which is an “attempt to change the socioeconomic composition of old and poor neighborhoods with the remodeling of old structures and building of new residences and shops to attract new middle- and high-income residents (Book, P.447).