There’s been many deaths caused by gangs they done many drive by. The sad part is the people who are murder are innocent people that are relate or close to their real target. Also when this killings happen the police discards the case and they forget about the innocent person. This also causes for more gangs to kill since police discard the case. In the website www.reddit.com they said, “80% of killings are done by gangs.” Guns also influence more gang violence.
The War on Drugs also contributed massively to high incarceration rates. New York, who has mostly ended their War on Drugs, have seen incarceration numbers plummet. In Oklahoma however, drug offenders share about 30 percent of their prison population. Ending the War on Drugs will not end mass incarceration alone. The federal government and a handful of states have successfully reduced their incarcerated populations by reforming their drug policies, and these can also work with other policies as
Southern states, who have the highest number of executions, have the highest rate of crimes according to the Death Penalty Information Center. Police Chief James Abbott stated, “I ... know that in practice, [the death penalty] does more harm than good. Life in prison without parole in a maximum-security detention facility is a better alternative (Death Penalty Information Center).” The purpose for the legal and justice system is to improve society, and by killing our own citizens, we are falling away from that better society. We should be focusing on how to prevent these crimes, instead of ushering out punishments after they occur. For America’s future, legislature needs to be put in place to end the capital punishment because of how it can affect innocent people and gives the government the power who lives and dies if this country wants to grow
Although this case was highly publicized and nearly two percent of murderers actually get the death penalty, this does not mean leaving hardened criminals without stringent punishment, and I have to disagree with D.A. Ayala's decision. Justice delivery must be improved but capital punishment must
It’s absolute cruelty to let the person know when will it be their last day. I’ll never have sympathy for a criminal who has murder an innocent, but let us remember we are no better if we do the same. Life without parole is a better alternative than the death penalty. Sentencing a murder to life without parole (LWP), is much more satisfying as well know that their cruelty will never surround us ever again. Taxpayers well be paying less if we remove the death penalty, LWP will require less resources that what will be provided during the death penalty.
That’s when plea bargains come into play because if not careful, than the defendant can play right into the system`s hands even if innocent. Innocence is another reason why people who are convicted of heinous crimes don’t deserve the death penalty. Many people spend years on death row, who are innocent before finally being released. ( Innocence
Meaning if a person injures or kills someone they should receive the same or worst punishment for them to learn from their mistakes. However because of this, this has caused many innocent people to be executed. The people that oppose the death penalty have many reasons on why they believe it is wrong and that is including one of them. Senate Judiciary Committee, is suggesting as an alternative "a real life sentence" for murder and "heinous crimes." Instead of putting these criminals that “ Deserve the death penalty to be executed sentence them life without parole.
The death penalty is used to punish those that have committed repugnant and capital crimes, and there are many ways of execution for these guilty prisoners. In my opinion, implementation is not justified punishment in any way possible. Therefore, no person, even with high authority, should have the right to determine another's life-based on that person's crime. The death penalty has been around since the beginning of time, but our country got the idea of using the death penalty when British Settlers traveled to the United States in 1607 (Part 1). Today, our government plans the death penalty when a person commits a major crime.
It is also a possibility that these death-row inmates are held for large amounts of time, maybe even years before their death sentence progresses, some might argue they deserve something better than the stereotype prison chili before they’re taken away. Getting this personal choice completely of their will before the end, might just be a little piece of heaven before they’re brought to hell. Although, only the craziest and most violent people get these sentences, which makes me beg to question if the public owes death-row inmates any kindness or respect. The public are the ones paying for this kindness after all, even if only by a penny, even the families of the victims. I feel like maybe this money might be better spent towards the victims of these criminals as some kind of compensation instead, or maybe more states should follow suit of Texas and do away with the process to completely avoid the complications instead of spending thousands on tax payer dollars when everything is said and done.
Since the dawn of civilization, humans have had an order to control the chaos created by others. When laws are broken by any individual, they have to be punished in some way. The death penalty is the sentence of execution for very serious crimes, such as murder, and other capital crimes. Stated by Amnesty International, China, Iran, Iraq, Saudi Arabia, and the USA are the 5 biggest executioners with a percentage of 82% of the world’s execution rate. Since 2013, there has been an increase in death sentences in over 57 countries.
Forty years have gone by and I think it’s finally time we acknowledge the inconvenient truth; Capital punishment is not a fair means of punishment and disproportionately affects minorities. In the landmark Supreme Court case McCleskey v. Kemp, a study conducted by David Baldus, a late Iowa Law Professor, concluded that black defendants indicted for murder were convicted nearly twice as much as white defendants and black defendants who killed white people received the death penalty four times more often than black defendants who killed other black people. This argument was a highlight of the case, but did not stop the Supreme Court from ignoring the statistics regarding racial bias in capital punishment cases. A vote of 5-4 ruled that tendencies
he death penalty deters criminals and makes them think twice. This would happen because if they do something really horrible they won’t do it the first place.According to “Death Penalty Focus : Innocent and Condemned to Die: The Story of Greg Wilhoit” “A second trial was held in 1993, but after the prosecution presented their case (without the bite mark evidence) the judge issued a directed verdict of innocence and Greg was cleared of all charges. (Condemned 2016)This means that the trial had second thoughts that helped Greg win the trial.The article “Capital Punishment” claims that “ President Bill Clinton signs the Violent crime control and Law enforcement act that expands the federal death penalty to 60 crimes including 3 that don’t involve
In 2011 the government passed a bill for mandatory sentence for the murder of police officers this stated life imprisonment would occur to the murderer. Many people would target police officers and would get a less severe punishment for it that is why this has been introduced. An example of this is On 2 March 2012, police officer David Rixon was killed Michael Jacobs got life imprison.