College athletes undertake quite the journey the instant they make the decision to dive into that pool, shoot that winning goal, or fulfill whatever their heart desires. These talented athletes have to manage their academic life, their personal life, and their athletic life all at once, which can prove to be a fairly difficult task, and considering that the only financial benefits they receive from it are scholarships, its understandable why some might be a bit disgruntled that they are not paid directly. However, paying college athletes is in no way a good idea, as this could lead them to neglect their academic life, and even take a major chunk out of an entire college's funding.
If colleges started paying their athletes, it could cause them
…show more content…
According to statistics, Division 1 basketball players are worth "about $170,000 or more per year to the schools they attend because of the money their sport earns" (Source 2, paragraph 14). This clearly shows that college athletics are a major player in overall college funding, and that just the elimination of this source of funding to a college will have extremely detrimental effects, let alone spending funds to pay the players a portion of that amount. Additionally, this can be further elaborated on with the consideration of an excerpt from Source 3, paragraph 23, in which it states that at the moment, basketball and football are the only two sports that have the potential to generate income for a college, and consequently, "smaller colleges that do not have basketball or football teams would have no money to pay their athletes in other sports" and that colleges "would be forced to cut other sports" because of this. This is most definitely not ideal for any college, as the cutting of athletics would not be beneficial to the student population or the institution itself, since this consequence would decrease the amount of diversity in athletic options students have, overemphasize football and basketball programs, and even act as a detriment to future applicants for the college because of this. Yet, in spite of this, some criticize this viewpoint, and argue that the financial gain from paid athletes representing other sports, such as gymnastics could allow for representation, which would, in theory, allow the students to advocate for their sport and maintain funding for it. However, this argument is flawed, as there are limits to a college institution's funding, and these limits would eventually overrule a student body trying to maintain funding for their sport, since the college would inevitably be pressured to generate more income through some way in
Why College Athletes should not get Paid Wouldn't you want your college to be a fair place? College athletes are not paid because fans could lose interest if the players had been expert athletes. Paying all college athletes involves a number of tough enterprises and money, so for universities to be an awesome and fair region for all students colleges generally choose to now not to pay college athletes. College athletes need to know not to be paid because these athletes chose to be athletes, and also no one has sufficient money to pay everyone, so there could now not be any equality, however, some argue that athletes spend all their time and don’t get what they deserve returned. Different programs within the college could be erased if college athletes receive a commission consistent with maryville.edu “athletes will diminish the spirit of amateurism” this means that if students get a possibility to receive a commission at college they may never need to pick some other class which can have an effect on their future.
Are you a students-athlete in need of compensation from the sport you love? There is a possibility of getting this kind of money from playing certain levels in sports. Paying college athletes has been and always will be an ongoing argument. I divine that paying these athletes will help students financial futures, help the costs of abrasions to the students themselves, and bring in prodigious amounts of money. Initially, paying college athletes will help them create a sense of financial awareness.
First, they put in 50 hours a week on their sport, and their coach is effectively their boss, with the ability to cut players from the team just, like a pro coach (Nocera 22). Clearly, the student athletes do not get much time for themselves. The athletes working such an enormous amount won't have a chance to have a part-time job to pay for the daily necessities. Finally, the student athletes have school work to complete, so the athletes do not get the full education that they need. Although the athletes are making money for the school, college athletes should not get paid because the students are getting their college paid for.
As noted in "It's Time to Pay College Athletes," “Players are essentially working full-time football jobs while going to school; they deserve to be paid more than a scholarship. Because even full-ride athletic scholarships don’t cover the full cost of attending school.” Text 2 line 15-17 In addition, college athletes are often required to spend long hours practicing and competing, which makes it difficult for them to have part-time jobs. By paying college athletes, universities could help alleviate some of the financial strain that these students
Another valid reason college athletes deserve pay is because of the numerous expenses that are not covered by sports scholarships. College athletes have the potential to be cash cows for their colleges and bring their institutions
The Argument Against Paying College Athletes The justification of attending college is to acquire professional training and skills, so why should college athletes be compensated? Paying college athletes more than the scholarships they already have is not a good idea. Even though college athletes should be paid because they don't have time to work, they shouldn't be paid because it could send a negative message to kids and high school students and they already got paid through their tuition, fees, and transportation. While it may inspire more children to participate in sports, it may also convey a negative message and misunderstand why they should do so.
But most do not have a steady source of income to pay for these things. A big conflict going on between colleges, the sports associations, and the college athletes is if these athletes should be getting paid for playing sports. Colleges and these associations think that these athletes should not be paid for playing sports. While the athletes
Over the past few years, the idea of paying college athletes has been a very hot and sought after topic to talk about. Many people desire and strive to one day be good enough at a sport that they can get a scholarship to continue their athletic careers. There has been many questions circulating in regards to if collegiate athletes should be paid to play for universities. Gaining an education and degree for cheaper than everyone else attending college should be more than enough to keep athletes playing for colleges. College athletes should not be paid to play their sport.
Another reason is that it does not help with the balance of different sports, if a college only focuses on the football team, the baseball team that is not as good will not have enough money to pay for some things, recruit some players and the sport and fame of the college will eventually die, all of these reasons make sense and I agree with but college athletes should be paid just not as
However these benefits do not outweigh the amount of revenue generated by college sports. According to a report by the National College Players Association, “the average scholarship for a football, basketball, and softball player is $3,285 per year”This means that even with scholarships many college athletes still struggle to pay for basic necessities like food and housing. Additionally, while College athletes do receive Healthcare this is often limited to injuries That occur while playing the sport they are not covered for the other medical issues that may arise in the future. While for education, its certainly a valuable benefit it does not compensate College athletes for the time and effort they put into their Sports. These so-called benefits that these college athletes get does not help them in the long run nor with things that will actually help them during their time playing their Sport and
College athletes deserve to be paid because they are the only ones not being paid in the college sports industry. The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) generates eleven billion dollars annually, some of which could, and should go to college athletes. “USA Today reported last year just how much money the top 10 coaches in college football made. Nick Saban from Alabama topped the list earning roughly $5.5 million in 2013 alone” (Seibold). The coaches are making millions of dollars and the players aren’t.
Many people may argue that by paying college athletes it will take away from the sports themselves because the athletes will be only focused on the money. While making money from playing their respective sport will change certain aspects of the game, it will not make it less competitive or enjoyable to watch. The money that these young men and women will make will not change their competitiveness and love for the game, it will only ensure that they are able to make ends meet by providing themselves with necessities. College athletes put in countless hours towards their sport, and they deserve compensation in
College athletes shouldn't be paid since doing so would damage their sports' amateurism and spoil upcoming athletes. I understand where those who support paying college athletes are coming from, but everyone wants money; it's just the way the world is. Many people believe that everyone in the industry is getting paid except for the athletes who are making all of the money in college sports, despite the fact that these organizations now generate billions of dollars in revenue. That is not accurate at all, as the majority of college athletes receive a full scholarship to the institution they attend, meaning they attend for free. As you can see, this is the justification for not paying college
If colleges began to pay their athletes, then they could build a bad reputation for being mercenary and lose their educational reputation If they are allowed to play, then it can be financially detrimental to the college because there are many flaws in the system. College athletes should not be compensated for their actions regarding athletic activities, no matter what sport or level they compete on. The idea that college athletes should or shouldn 't be paid
For example, if it wasn’t for basketball players, Gonzaga University would need to spend a lot more money on building a name recognition to students not located on the West. Everyone has their own opinion, but mine is that college athletes should be paid. The amount of time they put into their sport, the amount of money everyone else is making off of them, and their overall importance to the school are only three of a myriad of reasons why they should be paid. These athletes are not only students, but employees to their universities. They are a core member of many university’s marketing team.