Taking away rights not only hurt what defense we have with them but it takes away the sport and enjoyment of those who hunt (1). Taking away from the second amendment and not having the freedom of using guns as we please or when they are in need is not fair. Guns are not meant to be banned. Background checks need to be enforced now that this has come to be such a huge ordeal. Keeping everyone and their safety in mind is very important.
Ethical arguments for gun rights center on the right of security, civic duty, and constitutional right of the people. Those in favor of gun control focus on the human toll, loss of life, and the distortion of what the Second Amendment’s original intent. Hope for change and improvement in this issue is a long shot at best due to each side becoming more entrenched within their belief system. Framing the violence in America as a mental health issue distracts from the fact that we do indeed have a gun problem in America. The guns in of themselves do not present the issue, it is the access, supply, and the operation of these weapons that bring this issue to the forefront every time one watches the news or reads a newspaper.
Guns are crucial in American society. This is something many advocates of the 2nd Amendment and gun possession have been stating for decades. Although many believe that they have their own ideas about gun control in the US, they are not aware that their opinions are being influenced by biased media agencies. Not only is there pressure from the government, mass media cogitates their broadcasting information so that the public gets center minded by their theories, not leaving space for people to think in their own ways. An unbiased journalism is practically impossible, and this is proved and established by analyzing the truth of gun control news transmitted towards the public.
Peter Tucci, a free-lance journalist form the Daily Caller, argues against the establishment of more gun-control saying that it is not efficacious, widespread gun ownership protects citizens, and that gun control does not ensure the safety of the public. However, there is extensive research that suggests that the very opposite is true. The implementation of stricter gun control laws is now more important than ever because they are they are an effective means to reduce crimes and widespread gun ownership is deleterious to the safety of the public. The most frequently used argument against gun-control is that these laws simply are not effective. This is far from the truth as gun control has actually been shown to lower crimes rates.
Gangs use gun violence as a way to establish territorial control because they feel like their lives aren’t being valued. Some might say gun violence is a heart problem, but it is a value problem. The US Constitution speaks of equality for all. That should be what is addressed instead of a person’s access to firearms. Increase in Crimes Involving Alternative Weapons.
Not just “Criminals” Gun control has become a serious problem that The United States of America is facing today. Many people do not know how to control a gun and are not conscious of the lamentable effect that a gun can develop. “Many people have been saying for years that guns are inherently bad objects for a plethora of reasons”(Alex.C). The gun control issue is a controversial topic and many individuals have a different perspective about gun control. While people are arguing that having firearms is a good choice for their own security, others argue that a gun control can be dangerous.
There's constant bashing towards those who lean to the right of the political spectrum, such as myself , for disliking the concept of gun control. What I would like to see in our gun laws? I would like to see an america that is accepting of our second amendment. That is to say that I don’t want the complete freedom to get guns as we please, but to see a reform in gun laws ( I’d like to see a reform in many
Defenses are important for saving human lives. Gun control laws may restrict these people who are responsible from defending themselves. So honestly gun control contradicts itself as much as it helps. For starters does gun laws really deter crime. No, honestly gun control does not deter crime in all cases.
Gun Control is an emotional topic that elicits very strong emotions and arguments. It seems rare to find anyone that has not formed a solid opinion, is dogmatic, and of the opinion that anyone who dissents with them is of less intelligence. Just the definition of Gun Control can spark a heated debate. On one side of the spectrum appears to be those who want to move to a model such as those in Europe by banning all privately owned firearms. The other extreme is a staunch interpretation of the Second Amendment that every American has the right to own any firearm without registration or tracking by the Federal Government an anything less is unacceptable Gun Control.
Although many people own guns for self-protection, studies have repeatedly shown that keeping a gun in the home increases the risk of gun-related death or injury to a person living in the house. According to “Stronger Gun Control Laws Will Save Lives,” a gun kept in the home is more likely to be involved in an accidental shooting, domestic assault or a suicide attempt than it would to be used to injure or kill an intruder in self-defense (Burbick). In addition, no evidence exists to support the claim that society would be safer if more people carried concealed guns in public. Evidence shows that concealed carry laws may actually increase crime. Also, common sense tells us that putting more guns into more hands does not make anyone safer, it merely increases the odds that everyday disputes will escalate into deadly encounters (Gun Ownership with Stricter Controls Could Reduce Gun Violence).
Politicians talks about the need to increase gun restrictions to stop gun crime, but new and current gun laws are designed to fail in order to allow certain people to own them and make unhappy because of not having a vote others. We 've got to stop the madness! The problem isn 't the guns, it 's the criminals
Choosing to remove our weapons will only make our America a more hostile environment to live. Taking away that freedom would infuriate a large number of our population, and keeping those individuals peaceful would be a chore in itself. Johnson, Fawn. "Why Gun Control Can’t Eliminate Gun Violence." 18 Sept. 2013.
Although it largely depends upon the specific type, mental illnesses in general can degrade the rationality of a person’s decision-making ability. Since a person diagnosed with a mental illness is unable to properly make cognitive and logical choices, they are more likely to misuse firearms, thus posing a danger to themselves and others. Therefore, we must enact strict regulations that immobilize mentally-ill people from obtaining firearms. Gun regulations may seem repulsive to some people in our country, because for them, guns are the equivalent of freedom and security, and to regulate those firearms may be regarded as an encroachment upon American liberty. However, it is crucial to identify how this fallacy plagues our society; a gun is a gun, it is a weapon designed for the purpose of ending someone’s life.
Gun control will make the people of the US weak because they will not be able to protect themselves when a dangerous man has gotten a gun illegally and wants to harm. “As columnist Thomas Sowell has noted: ‘The key fallacy of so called gun control laws is that such laws do not in fact control guns. They simply disarm law-abiding citizens, while people bent on violence find firearms readily available. Banning guns will not stop the crazed few who seek to open fire on the public’” (Hunter). Many different potential mass shootings have been stopped by a citizen who owned a legal gun and acted in defense.