The Internet users can’t post their ideas freely in the Internet anymore, as only sharing a link to a social media might already be considered as a copyright infringement act. Then, some websites such as Youtube or Facebook might also be in trouble because of this regulation. In this case, TPP is both morally and humanely wrong as it takes away people’s rights and freedom of expression, which is something that a human being should have in order to live righteously. Therefore, it is clear that TPP gives numerous downsides to the corresponding
Censorship can be described as the act of cutting out certain material that can be considered obscene or inconvenient for the community. This material can be found in social media such as in the TV, radio, or the internet. Censorship can be challenged because of the first amendment: freedom of speech. Free expression is the right of expressing opinions and ideas without any fear of being restrained or censored. However, freedom of speech does not include the right to incite actions that would harm others or the distribution of obscene material (Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts, 2000).
If they had that amount of control it would be crushing. We would no longer be able to post opinions online if the government didn 't approve. Which would violate our freedom of speech and freedom of press. Now the government should have control to the extent where they aren 't taking down opinions and posts because they don 't like it. Thankfully the government has restrictions on what they can do to the internet.
Protection requires constant vigilance and monitoring of communications. There are debates about the extent of government monitoring of the internet. Many people see the government_Ñés monitoring of its citizens_Ñé internet content as a violation of the first, third, fourth, and ninth amendment and the right to privacy given to American Citizens in Griswold vs. Connecticut (Griswold v. Connecticut). The Patriot Act superseded these ideas and gives the government rights to invade this privacy in order to maintain a stable and secure nation. (Pilcher).
CITIZENFOUR ESSAY I believe everyone needs to have privacy, and privacy is a condition that on my opinion, should not be violated. Because it is the right to keeps people’s matters and relationships secret. The NSA, CIA and GCHQ are logging into people’s lives according to Edward Snowden in the movie ‘’Citizenfour’’. I don’t think what they are doing is okay, because I consider it is an invasion on private life. In the movie I learned that these people can know what you search for on the Internet, they can see your emails and what you buy online, among others.
The first, anonymity allows cyberbullies to prey on vuinerable peers without taking personal responsibility, just as they bring people together for constructive reasons, social media can connect dissatisfied, disgruntled, dislike, disliking, negative thoughts, and misguided people together, then they get logether and they might make a group because they have one mind, further fueling, negative attitudes and beliefs. Second, Social Media make us forget about the real world, most people prefer to spend time in Social Media, because they feel that Social Media has become a routine that they do everyday. Social Media not only make them busier than the real world, but Social Media succeeds in making them dependent or Social Media, and sometimes they forget to eat and bathe for being too passionate about Social Media, sometimes social media also make us smile by ourselves for seeing the news, or post from people who are in Social
Another great example is social media which can portray many expressions. When using any type of social media you might feel violated of the first amendment when people can report your post to be “inappropriate”. This all goes back to not having 100% right to say or post whatever you'd like. Without the cues of body language and tone, a simple post can sound threatening and offensive. So how can you overpass the law of “threat to injure the person of another” if a post is made?
Patient privacy and confidentiality with social media is an issue because of its public nature, there are little regulations regarding the use of social media. In the Netherlands, policies have been developed to address this issue by educating professionals and patients about the need to consider the publicness and the permanence of online activities before posting comments about one’s own health (Adams
Imagine we lived in a world where no one could comment anonymously online. If everyone had to have their information for anyone to see, including thefts, and hackers. What if someone wanted to give an anonymous “tip”, and give the police some information without revealing any information about us. All of this falls under the right to be anonymous online. Which also falls under the right to freedom of speech.
Accept only those “facts” that support what you already believe” This quote may explain why a facebook user never reads or shares article that goes against their preconceived notions because, according to Pitt, in today’s world people want to ignore inconvenient truths. Sunstein points out, “ The consequence is the “proliferation of biased narratives fomented by unsubstantiated rumors, mistrust, and paranoia.” Pitts concludes “And when people are determined to believe a lie, there is nothing more futile than the truth.” arguing further that the rumors and mistrust can create an alternative history based not on facts but stereotypes passed from generation to generation. Both columnists explore the result of people who do not seek out information that contrasts their opinion. Sunstein explains the spread of fake news through the studies of facebook users while Pitts uses personal experience to demonstrate the lack of critical thinking he sees through the eyes of responders to his
“The NSA is not listening to Americans ' phone calls or monitoring their emails” (Does the Government). As the government states they are permitted to collect any Americans communications The Fourth Amendment protects your privacy, for instance the police cannot search personal properties. Due to the definition of "the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers,” it makes people feel secure (Legal Information). In addition, it prevents all irrelevant searches that are not useful. On the other hand the Fourth Amendment makes it challenging for law enforcement to gather information.
While using tor is a great way to keep your searches from being tracked. It also comes with its downfall. While using tor it is wise to avoid using any accounts that identify you. That includes any accounts that store your user names, real names, address information or anything in the matter that can be linked to you. Sites that require your location or that require webcams.
The defendant had a bad faith intent to profit from the mark or marks associated with the plaintiff.. Definition of confusingly similar to a famous mark In this context the court does not need to consider such things as punctuation, spacing or capitalization as the format of domain names does not allow for such things. Furthermore there is no test for determining whether or not something is confusingly similar and as such it is left up to court to decide. Definition of bad faith intent Bad faith means by trick people to visit his site or get benefits from the domain name which is similar to a popular trademark,there are many factors involved in determining if something was bad faith
3. Don’t allow any program remember (such as internet explorer) your passwords. It is risky. Hackers could steal such passwords without your knowledge. You should rather install a reputable password manager to remember your passwords.