In the scenario of Karl and Bob, they are both wrong in their actions. Their problem started when they decided to flee town in order to run away from their problems. As a result, Karl and Bob’s situation became more severe because Karl decided to steal a thousand dollars from a store and Bob decided to cheat an old retired man into giving him a thousand dollars. Karl’s actions may seem worse in the eyes of society and the law; however, when considering the morality of the situation, I am convinced that Bob was worst in his actions to cheat the elderly retired man.
The difference between stealing from the store and cheating the elderly retired man is that the store can gain the money it lost fairly quick in contrast it may be harder for the elderly man to regain the money that he unfortunately lost because he is retired. Another difference is that Karl can go to jail for the
…show more content…
When Bob made that promise, the old man expected his to follow through and keep his end of the bargain. In reality, Bob never intended to keep his promise to the old man. His intentions are wrong because promises made to people should be kept regardless of if you know them very well or not. The actions of one person can have a huge effect on another. It is possible because Bob cheated the aged retired man, the elderly man will stop helping other like he usually does.
The money the aged man gave to Bob could have been used to help someone who was actually sick or someone in desperate need of the money for ethical reasons.Although it may be true that the elderly man may have been slightly irresponsible by being naive and giving away the money without ensuring that what Bob was saying was genuine, in spite of that, his deeds were noble and recommendable; whereas Bob’s actions was dishonest and unethical. Ultimately, Bob was wrong in his actions because he did a terrible thing to a very good
In The Pigman by Paul Zindel, the character John Conlan’s philosophy on life is too irresponsible and selfish. John chooses to put himself first even if it’s at the expense of others. When he and Lorraine went to collect Mr. Pignati’s money for their “charity”, he said “‘I’ve been thinking, and I’ve decided we’d better go over and collect the ten bucks,’... ‘We’re not doing anything bad,’ I insisted. ”(36).
Human nature dictates that every action, no matter how selfless it appears, is inspired by a selfish reason. Flannery O'Connor shows this taken into consideration in her short story, “The Life You Save May Be Your Own”. The protagonist, Mr. Shiftlet, wanders onto the farm of old and young Lucynell. Mr. Shiftlet marries her daughter young Lucynell and does a handful of work for her including fixing her car, which he sees as a way of achieving freedom. With her use of symbolism and characterization O'Connor reveals that people play games of deceit to win their own selfish ends (Walters 82).
For example “I saw a woman stranded on the road,” he’d say. “So i changed her tire for her”(Pfeffer 2) and also once he found a wallet and returned it to the owner without accepting the reward. but even though he does all these great things, he still doesn’t get that much money. This is shown well in the second to last sentence says “...I could hear my father’s car keening in the distance. ”(Pfeffer 4).
The moral assessment was right, I think. In which right can mean wrong, and if it is wrong then I don’t want to be right. It was just him, and no one helped him get to where he is. The community may have been against him, but it didn’t ruin his morals. I give thanks to Ayn Rand for a great book and a great example , R.I.P. for your writing will always be
For example, George helped Uncle Billy find his $8000 so his company would continue. He also helped his brother from drowning. George
One good example that could go with the theme is, “He made me a magazine rack in his Manual Training class and one week he saved his lunch money and bought me three packs of cigarettes.” (6, McCullers) Sucker is coming out as a really nice person by making something for his cousin and even saving his lunch money so he can't eat and buying his cousin three packs of cigarettes. His cousin doesn’t care about him at all and if he wasn’t so lazing then he would go find a job and get money from that to go get cigarettes. Sucker’s cousin is taking advantage of him and it’s not ok. But sucker is being nice and giving it to him.
Additionally, the speaker says in the last line that if he were a friend of the man that man might have helped him by lending money. In the speaker’s speech, although the man whom he kills might not be wealthy, but having a friend to talk with might help in another way, such as giving a suggestion. As a result, it shows that the speaker himself is facing a financial problem as
In the beginning, the author describes a man who looks to be homeless and how the man stops in front of a baby. When the baby’s mother sees this, she seems to get a bit tense, so she searches inside her purse to find a dollar to give him. The author later questions the mother’s motive for giving the man the dollar and whether she gave it to him because she cared or she was frightened by him. Ascher later writes about an experience she had at a coffee shop. She describes a man, who is dressed poorly and has an unpleasant smell, being given a hot cup of coffee and a paper bag with something inside from the owner of the shop.
Reflections Being a thief is not as easy as many would think. “Thief”, a short story by Jess Walters, involves a man named Wayne who discovers someone within his family is stealing from their vacation savings jar. This only drives him crazy as money keeps disappearing time after time. In his head, Wayne begins to investigate and accuse his children of how and why they would be stealing from the jar. All the while he never he thinks to question his wife, Karen.
All things considered, in life, unfortunate circumstances can turn into fruitful rewards. In Joe’s case, doing the right thing and saving a life turned into a beneficial outcome. From this essay, you’ve learned that Joe’s actions of saving a woman, acting heroically, and humbly turning down a generous reward caused the plot to move forward. That without the author using myth-like elements in the text, the storyline would never progress. Ultimately, in Joe looking out for someone else’s interests, he led himself into living a life with better resources and a
Generally, Singer hopes that people should make a plausible budget to donate money to strangers (384). He starts criticizing Americans who waste their money in things that not necessary to them when he said, “The average family in United States spends almost one-third of its income on things that are no more necessary to them than Dora’s new TV was to her” (379). Here, Singer is trying to warn families not to spend money in not necessary things that this money could mean difference between life and death. At this point, the author is very serious about people’s spending, which could save children’s lives. He also gives his reader a story about Bob, who been in a difficult situation that he can save a child’s life, but he could lose his fancy
They encountered a man on the road that had been struck by lightning and was also suffering from starvation. The boy wanted to turn back and help the wounded stranger, but the man had to explain to the boy that they did not have enough of anything to share with him (McCarthy 49-52). They barely had enough to take care of themselves, and if they gave away anything that they had, they would be more likely to starve. It was a decision between their own lives and others’. There was also another occasion where the man and boy were on the beach and were robbed of most of their belongings (McCarthy).
As when he meets the thief, though he knows that chase will be dangerous, but he still chases him because of the blankets and the food, which can keep his son survives. That is why the father says to his son that “‘What do you think would have happened to us if we hadnt caught him?”’(McCarthy258). When he caught the thief, he asks the thief to take off everything. He says, "'Take your clothes off", "Take them off. Every goddamned stitch", "The shoes", "Put them in the cart"'(McCarthy256,257).
Instead of kindly donating, he spits out a crude and evil response saying “Let them die, and they better do it quick to decrease the surplus population” and “Are there no prisons? Are there no workhouses?” referring to how the workhouses/prisons could be the poor’s ‘home’. However, at the end of the play, with the help of three spirits and his dead business partner, he changed into a caring, energetic man with a love for
A person is driving and stops at a red light. Suddenly a strange man approaches the window begging for money because he had lost everything. Does the driver hand over money to the seemingly distressed stranger who needs a helping hand? Or are they being played like a violin? Did that person really lose all he had?