Ethical Relativism Case Study

1370 Words6 Pages
Introduction There are three cases that must be existent for a status to be considered an ethical dilemma. The first case occurs in situations when someone must decide about which path of action is best. state that is uneasy but that don’t require a choice, are not ethical dilemmas. For example, students in their internships are required to be under the supervision of an appropriately dependable social work field instructor. The second case for ethical dilemma is that there must be many paths of action to choose from. Third, in an ethical dilemma, no matter what path of action is taken, some ethical norm is come to term. In other words, there is no perfect solution. In defining what contain an ethical dilemma, it is necessary to make a singularity between ethics, values, morals.…show more content…
Because There are no universally accepted ethical standards that I can follow in each situation to do the right thing, but here it is clear that it is wrong it is like the stealing and stealing is always wrong (absolutism). What is objectivism? There is an objectivism right and wrong. What is the ethical relativism? Ethical relativism tells us that there is no objective right or wrong. That is, whether an action is right or wrong rely on the moral norms of the society in which it is practiced. Ethical relativism is the theory that fill that morality is relative to the standards of one 's culture. The same action may be morally right in one society but be morally wrong in another. For ethical there are no universally accepted ethical standard that can be applied to everyone at same times. Two forms of Ethical relativism ◦ Individual Ethical Relativism: I have my ethical opinion or vision and you have yours, neither is better or more correct ◦ Cultural Ethical Relativism: ethical values differ from society to society. ◦ People in a society may believe their moral views to be correct, but no society’s views are better than any
Open Document