ipl-logo

Personal Narrative: A Lifeboat Dilemma

901 Words4 Pages

The issue here is a situation, a lifeboat dilemma. You are afloat in a lifeboat with too many people during a storm and you have a gun and plenty of ammo. You have FOUR options here after.
1) Wait for the storm to drown everyone.
2) Kill yourself to avoid the decision.
3) Kill everyone before the storm arrives.
4) Kill some to save some before the storm arrives.
IS IT BETTER TO DIE OR LIVE THE CONSEQUENCES OF YOUR DECISION??

Most people go for option 4. Here, we shall discuss all the four options and then conclude that the fourth option is the most ethically correct option.

Lets analyze this situation by stepping into the shoes of the man with the gun.

Taking option 1, I had the instrument for saving the people. Well, some of the people. But, I could’ve. It is somewhat ethically correct to choose option 1. I am not above all the people who are onboard. I do not have the …show more content…

It says that I kill myself to avoid taking the decision. But then, that would be a cowardly thing to do. I had the chance to save lives. I didn’t. Instead, I kill myself. Just because I didn’t have the guts to kill someone else, I kill myself. This is ethically correct. In fact, this is more ethical than option 1. Choosing option one killed everyone on the boat along with yourself. Choosing option 2 might save some people. But, we wouldn’t know what happens after I kill myself. Do all the people on the boat die? Do they kill some more and save some lives? We wouldn’t know.

Lets have a look at option 3. I kill everyone on the ship. That would be the most unethical thing to do. I don’t save anyone. I kill everyone and I save myself. A sign of utter selfishness. This would also indicate that I think of myself above everyone else. So, this would be a very wrong thing to do. So, we can say that option 3 is the not at all an ethically correct choice.

So, till now, the order of options from least ethical to most ethical would be: OPTION 3, OPTION 1, OPTION

Show More
Related

  • Physician Assisted Suicide Summary

    1953 Words  | 8 Pages

    Gill responds to this objection in many ways. He claims that allowing a person to choose to take their own life is one of the biggest decisions that they can make on their own. He believes that if a terminally

    Read More

  • Hurst's Sixth Amendment Essay

    1820 Words  | 8 Pages

    It is the decision between life and death and should be taken as

    Read More

  • Persuasive Speech Outline On Assisted Suicide

    1112 Words  | 5 Pages

    Creative Title: Assisted Suicide: How Far Would You Go? Specific Purpose: To inform my audience about assisted suicides. Central Idea: Assisted suicide can be looked upon from three different angles, and three different perspectives. INTRODUCTION I.

    Read More

  • Comparing Kant's Categorical Imperative And John Stuart Mill

    507 Words  | 3 Pages

    When using the utilitarian approach, suffering is always involved even if it is to a small degree. When acting along Kant’s categorical imperative, it is simpler and fairer. When acting you would only have to ask “If someone else did this would it be okay for them too?” If the utilitarian approach was used the person would have to ask more questions regarding the situation. Using categorical imperative is fairer because suffering, even to a slight amount, wouldn’t be an option.

    Read More

  • People Should Not Be Held Accountable In Life Essay

    937 Words  | 4 Pages

    In life we have to make decisions that could result in someone's life ending. When people are put in these situations I think that they should not be held accountable for their actions. The decisions that they make could be affected by if they are held accountable or not. I think that people should not be held accountable for their actions in life or death situations.

    Read More

  • Utilitarian Approach To Gun Control

    631 Words  | 3 Pages

    While this is hypothetical, it fits with the concept of the utilitarian approach as the “potential good” becomes the focus of the argument as proponents argue for a reduction in guns through gun

    Read More

  • Gentleman Your Verdict Analysis

    677 Words  | 3 Pages

    The only way for a portion of the crew members to live was for numerous men to die. In this situation, I think that this was the best situation. I think that my personal morals do have been madealign with positively with Commander Oram’s decision partly because he made the best out of a strenuous situation. I think that if I had been in that particular situation, I would have done the same thing but alternately, I would have made everyone write a goodbye letter to their loved ones. That way, the families of those who died would have some sort of closure.

    Read More

  • You Don T Know Jack Movie Analysis

    1497 Words  | 6 Pages

    The main ethical content of this film “You Don’t Know Jack” revolves around this argument. It is about mercy killing which can be supported on the basis that it puts an end to the suffering of terminally ill patient whose cure is certainly not possible. And it can be further backed by argument that a dead patient’s organs can give a new lease of life to many patients who can be cured. In this movie pathologist named Dr. Jack Kevorkian launches his work of death counseling activities to the terminally ill patients. He earns the support of Hemlock society.

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay: Life Support And Brain Dead Patients

    1340 Words  | 6 Pages

    Even so, it is difficult for families to make this choice because they don’t want to “kill” their loved ones if they

    Read More

  • A Right To Self-Discrimination David Velleman Analysis

    2030 Words  | 9 Pages

    In his article ‘A Right to Self-Termination?’ David Velleman brings up the topic of the right to die and elaborates his view on the subject. Two broad principles are stated by Velleman and he goes on to reject the first principle and accept the second principle. The first principle is that “a person has the right to make his own life shorter in order to make it better… ”the second principle is that there is “a presumption in favor of deferring to a person's judgment on the subject of his own good.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of The Trolley Problem

    2262 Words  | 10 Pages

    To deal with these dilemmas, utilitarianism and duty ethics theories should be taken into account. For a utilitarian decision maker, who will attempt to maximize the sum of utility for all concerned (Kvalnes, 2015), the third person should pull the switch or push the fat man to reduce the killings from five persons to one person; that is, keeping the number of people died to a minimum. In contrast, in duty ethics perspectives, there are moral considerations more important than

    Read More

  • Deontological Ethics: The Ethical Ethics Of Assisted Suicide

    1252 Words  | 6 Pages

    Assisted suicide is a rather controversial issue in contemporary society. When a terminally ill patient formally requests to be euthanized by a board certified physician, an ethical dilemma arises. Can someone ethically end the life of another human being, even if the patient will die in less than six months? Unlike traditional suicide, euthanasia included multiple individuals including the patient, doctor, and witnesses, where each party involved has a set of legal responsibilities. In order to understand this quandary and eventually reach a conclusion, each party involved must have their responsibilities analyzed and the underlying guidelines of moral ethics must be investigated.

    Read More

  • Strengths And Weaknesses Of Utilitarianism

    1711 Words  | 7 Pages

    Suppose a conductor is driving his train and the breaks are defect. The rails lead directly into a cluster of five people who would all die if the train will go this direction. However, the conductor can change onto another track where only one person is standing hence only one person would die. How should the conductor react (Hare, 1964)? Is it possible to condense the problem to a rather simple maximization problem in example that the action is taken, which would kill the least people?

    Read More

  • Arguments Against Gun Ownership

    1390 Words  | 6 Pages

    Moreover, guns are ineffective for self-defense in many situations. In other words, the risks outweigh the potential advantages by far. Moreover, what is right should not be abandoned, only because it is difficult to implement. It is time that the ownership of guns is restricted to those who need them for professional reasons. The result would be a safer and better

    Read More

  • Analysis: When Living Is A Fate Worse Than Death

    859 Words  | 4 Pages

    Life or Death Who chooses death over life? Sometimes we have to make this decision over a loved one when there is no hope for their recovery. It would be incredibly hard to make this life or death decision on another human being and twice as hard when it is someone we love. The author discusses the argument of this controversial topic of sustaining life at any cost or dying peacefully as an ethical issue. An ethicist, a person who specializes in or writes on ethics, can provide valuable discernment with respect to right and wrong motives or actions.

    Read More

More about Personal Narrative: A Lifeboat Dilemma

Open Document