If medical experiments wouldn’t be conducted on humans, other animals shouldn’t have to be subjected to them either since they also feel pain. So it is morally wrong to perform medical experiments of products intended for human use on animals since the experiments are agonizing whether it be humans or other animals. And also depending on the experiment, “lab animals will sometimes suffer more than people would, sometimes physically, sometimes psychologically.” (Greenhaven press #84). Sometimes animals can feel more physical or emotional pain than humans would in certain
Animals are living creatures that have feelings just like a human being. Animals are not like us on the physical part, but that doesn’t mean that we have the right to kill, hurt or even experiment with them. If you ever had a pet or knew someone related to you who had a pet, they’d probably always be talking about how kind, sweet, beautiful, and lovely their animals are. Animal are even used to test products such as Shampoos, perfumes and cosmetics. Those products aren’t like the ones we use, they have different types of chemicals and they try them on the animals to see if it will affect us.
A high number of people, according to polls, state that they would rather like to see an alternative to testing. While many say that animal testing must be done to guarantee safety, it isn’t actually safe. Products tested on animals may be poisonous to humans but companies use labels stating “may be dangerous” for liability purposes.“Testing cosmetics on animals is a cruel, outdated and unnecessary practice. Our nation’s largest trading partner — the European Union — has banned the sale of animal-tested cosmetics and proven it is possible to produce safe cosmetics without harming animals.” (Bob Barker, 2006). The reason laboratories don’t want to find an alternative is because of the time, work, money, and they take an observation.
In his essay for that series, Jeff Schloss addressed the question of whether animal death is a natural evil, but also noted that such theological considerations aside, death does not actually “drive evolution” in the way most people imagine—especially when they think of violence in the natural world. This more complicated sense of death’s role is partially the result of modern evolutionary science recognizing the importance of cooperation and inter-relation among species, rather than just direct competition. But just as important is the knowledge that evolution is significantly shaped not by the deaths of individual creatures, but by extinction, the loss of species over time. In this post, we explore some aspects of how extinction acts as both a destructive and creative force in evolutionary history, including the evolutionary history of mammals. 4)all living organism still share the same genetic code ..?
According to The Gospel Coalition the “intermixing of genetic material becomes more morally problematic” because few believe that it “violates the species barrier instituted by our Creator”. While others consider the uses of chimeras “morally legitimate” (Carter). However, chimeras are being created so that they “can be used to transplant organs into people who are in need of them.” Chimeras are also used as a model to study how human diseases happen and how they progress. Chimeras are being used to create “life saving organs and potential treatments for debilitating disease” (Imam). Furthermore, the creation of chimeras also connects to the ethical controversy in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein.
Perhaps some people would even be the ones testing on these animals as long as they get paid. Be that as it may, others view these tests as immoral and should be illegal universally. So much so that there are animal activists who protest against the use of animal testing for cosmetics. Similarly, an organization
And while they say there is no reliable alternative, who is to say that animals are reliable? There have been many cases where the tests worked on animals but when it came to humans it did not work the outcome was deadly sometimes. There are also other alternatives that can provide better results like “In vitro (in glass) testing, such as studying cell cultures in a petri dish, can produce more relevant results than animal testing because human cells can be used.” (2). There are better ways to test besides just on animals so maybe one day it can
Animal testing is necessary if we want to make timely medical progress . It is true that animal testing is painful, but they are not hideous monsters. Most scientist do not like to do animal testing, they are attached to them. Many people oppose because animal testing is bad. They are tortured during animal testing.
Animal experimentation is a highly debatable issue in our society today. There are many people who are against the subject because they have no enough knowledge about it. Because of the critical animal research, scientists are able to save the lives of both humans and animals. Also, with the help of animal testing, various treatments and medicines are discovered.
Animal testing indicates supporting human beings through using another species for our human benefits. It’s been seen as an unethical action, something cruel; due to the fact that we take away the animal freedom. However, if we weren’t to use animal testing, the medicines and cosmetics we use today wouldn’t have been known to be safe. Yet, it should be considered to see whether it is ethically right to let animals suffer only because of our own influences. Even though it would be very reasonable to get rid of animal cruelty, it wouldn’t only indicate the banning of animal testing, but also the preventing of the production of clothing and the provision of food such as the meat of an animal Even though there are many reasons for claiming animal testing to be wrong, scientists don’t stop to use animals for medicines and scientific research.