Thesis statement: Police should wear body cameras because playing body cameras could improve the public’s view of police by showing the human side, help to provide evidence when a person may not be able to, and it protects the officers and public both. Cameras Imagine there is a huge case going on where a police officer is coming under question on if dealt with a potential suspect in the correct way. Now think about the money being used to provide lawyers, a judge, a jury, etc., to handle the high profile case. Now there is two possible outcomes, there was police misconduct and abuse of power, or the police officer did everything correctly and by the book. Either way there needs to be something that can protect the public from police misconduct and also protect law enforcement from dealing with false accusations that can tarnish their reputation.
You have several parts of the criminal justice system like law enforcement, prosecution, defense attorneys, you have the court system there are restrictions on a case being prosecuted including the right to confront ones accusers. Nevertheless, the courts are run by judges, all of these are to ensure a fair trial for the accused. Finally the corrections, when there is a conviction and the charges given for jail time the defended will be sent to the corrections system for punishment. As it concerns the victim civil court proceedings as victims speak out more against wrong doers, the offender will know there are consequences. It allows the victim to feel empowered verse being afraid or feelings of hopelessness.
The theory is very pro-active and requires law enforcement officers to recognize, not ignore, offense and deal with it. Offenses such as graffiti, loitering, soliciting, parking violation, traffic driving, truancy, and abandoned property are minor offenses that grow into larger problems that can transform a good neighborhood into a chaotic neighborhood within the span of 10 years. However, there are a lot of disadvantages to the broken window theory. The first disadvantages to the broken windows theory is the zero-tolerance policy. Zero tolerance policing relies on the premise that the more arrests made by officers for minor crimes contributing to community disorder, the less severe crime that community will have to
These law makers must properly asses this bill and the affects it will have on prisons systems, individual offenders, and the crime rate. All offenders should not be generalized and sentenced according one law because every circumstance is different. We must restore our faith in the appointed criminal judges that they will do everything within their power to administer the law appropriately and fair based on evidence and intent. Overturning mandatory minimum laws starts with knowing a few specific details. These details include: what mandatory minimums are and what brought about their start, knowing what classification of offenders are affected by the laws and if it is warranted for the offense, the number of inmates incarcerated currently that are serving mandatory minimum sentences, and the impact mandatory minimum laws have on the prison systems.
Based on this statement it can be argued that Alonzo believed he was doing the right thing even if it meant breaking the law; which is the definition of ethical formalism as it states that “if act or intent is inherently coming form a good will, it is considered a good act even if it results in bad consequences” (Pollock, 2015. P. 33). Ethical Dilemmas During the movie “Training Day” there were two key dilemmas that took place one being smoking drugs in the car and the other being the murder of Doug Rosselli ( Harris Yulin). Both of these dilemmas consisted of superiors’ vs rookie and in both cases the cop code prevailed. Basically the police subculture is what protected him; that unspoken rule of do not tell on another officer and in order to be accepted you adapt to the policing culture of your fired.
Most of the time this results in prison sentencing. But when the only action is to lock people up, it doesn’t require that the individual act in a certain way, or change. Instead, it excuses the offender from answering for what they have done or punishes them in a way that does not consider the individual criminal and his or her crimes on others and such crimes impact on the overall community. Restorative justice is a victim-led process to hold offenders accountable while concurrently fulfilling the needs of all parties involved (Keenan and Joyce, 2013). This essay will critically evaluate the guiding principles of restorative justice, and more specifically look at the benefits of applying this method to sexual violence and domestic violence cases; this will be done by examining common procedures and guidelines, understanding the strengths and weaknesses, and observing specific case
The lessons about police corruption continue to break the basic building blocks of the nation. The many variations of police corruption undoubtedly effects perceptions of law as a legitimate establishment. One issue looms in the definition of corruption across the vast cultures within the United States. Suggestively, solutions to police corruption can be reduced by enlisting basic, cross-cultural, mass police department policies and procedures. Efforts to lower police corruption should be based on the selective differences between the individuals that cause it.
I am having dubious feelings for the success of the geomapping of offender residences idea. The GIS applications enable the crime agencies and the society and as a result, they would be having more knowledge on criminals and statistics and visual depiction serve as a good benchmark for mapping crime and criminal preferred location. Due to which, in my judgment, sex offenders will look for isolated places due to the presence of the geomapping implementation. But, this in turn, would also be beneficial for the criminals to carry out crime activities within least mapped areas. Also, technology and managerial efforts’ failures are conceivable and it can be crucial in certain circumstances.
Equality in justice is a fundamental principle of a democratic system and the Constitution protects individuals from unfair treatment; nevertheless, there is evidence that shows how this principle is not always followed. Finally, criminal procedures act as safeguard against an indiscriminate application of criminal laws and treatment of individuals suspected of crime, and the main safeguards regarding criminal procedure are found in Amendments IV, V, VI and VIIIs. Hopefully the information provided within this paper has served as an initial insight into the roles of ethics in justice. As it seems that the entire criminal justice functions by the rule of ethics and different ethical rules lead to very different judicial outcomes, it is important to use the theory of ethics are a guide for applying them in specific judicial contexts in accordance to the fundamental principles of freedom and
The criminal justice system, like any system is designed by human beings and hence possess the possibility of a loophole for criminals. Needless to say, the system was introduced in order to maintain law and order as well as provide a safe community for the people. If this is true, then why do we get to witness crimes, some beyond the horror of one’s imaginations and later find that the court decided to rule in the accuser’s favor by making
The media should therefore try to get the right information from the police to help them to reveal the exact information to the nation. This way the community will feel obliged to inform the media of any information that might be of help to the community (Miller et al., 2014). 2 The police and the media can easily address crime in the community by cooperating with the members. The media should not only post the negative information but they should research and find the cause of the increased gangs. It is also important for the media to note that crime is everywhere and it is unfair to view Anonymous Community as one fool of criminals.