The ethical stance one has as an adult is more often than not the result of the cultural conditioning that one received as a child; however, as one grows to adulthood it is necessary for one to examine one’s ethics. A way that people can be made to re-examine their values is by reading thought provoking texts such as Steven B. Oats’ “Fires of Jubilee.”The book reviews the accounts of the life of Nate Turner, who lead a rebellion against the slave owners of South Hampton County Virginia. Fires of Jubilee strike one with the philosophical question of when if ever does one have the right to take another person’s life, while at the same time reemphasizes that it is man’s most essential nature to try and escape from any place or thing that would …show more content…
Although religion may assist some in these way, an individual may find themselves blinded to reality if they are not cautious. As a young child, Nates family and owners were impressed with the youths ability to read at such an early age and amazed by his ability to recall events that happened before his birth. One can imagine that the high praise and admiration helped to form Nate's high expectations of his life. However, At twelve the reality of his bondage was made all to real when he was assigned to work in the field, a job that Nate felt was too common for someone as important as him. One can assume that the sudden knowledge that he would be a field worker for the rest of his life was traumatic to the self-exalted youth. One might even go so far as to say that until he was forced to work Nate was not acutely aware of his enslavement. To help cope with the devastation, Nate turned to God for answers and found solace in his prayers fasting, and religious education. Nate discovered, the path for the restoration of his position of grandeur in the slave community's church, and quickly become the most influential black preacher in the area. Nate was further traumatized when after the death of his master Nate was sold to a different plantation than his wife and children. One can only imagine the torment Nate felt, the husband and father …show more content…
To adequately address such questions of ethics One must attempt to understand the dehumanizing nature of slavery and analyze the actual value, One places on human life. Although One may be able to speculate on the severity of the trauma that Nate, and inevitably all slaves went through during their lives in bondage, due to the historical records such as " Fires of Jubilee." It is hard to comprehend the pain of knowing One is the possession of another, to be bought and sold like cattle. If one concluded that slavery was not sufficient reason to commit murder, then in what case would it be? What about the opportunity to change the world for the better? Would those same innocent children not grow to become slave owners one day and would the women not produce more future slave owners if left to live? What cost would one be willing to pay to attempt a chance to end not only one's bondage but the lives of future generations from the same fate? Could any person claim the life of a child for the crimes they may or may not commit as adults? The American Revolution was the voice of the common people denying the ruling classes their ability to mandate how they people would live. Was Nate's cause any different from that of the Founding
Some of these whites were boiling mad and wanted to avenge the atrocities they had found” (99). When Nat and his men killed the White slave owners and their families—the black insurgents made it worse for their fellow slaves that had been left behind. Around 60 whites and 200 blacks were killed during this rebellion. It is hard to see what was accomplished when so many lives were lost. Before Nat is brought to his death he said, “Was not Christ crucified?”
Fires of Jubilee The author, Stephen B. Oates described this book as a book that’s adventurous and never ending. The authors purpose of this book was to bring back the past and tell us what we didn’t know about the slave rebellion. Tell us what was actually happening behind the great battles that were lead by the Americans and the British, also the French. He wrote this book in many different ways, and ideas. Sometimes the story will jump into another subject that is relating to the other subjects.
In the novel, Invisible Man, the narrator is always in pursuance of justice. His consistent search is driven by his inability to be treated as an equal in this white man’s society. As he fought for justice for the “dispossessed” the Narrator was constantly faced with injustice. Although his success seemed positive in the eyes of others, it had a negative impact on his life as a whole.
Frederick Douglass, a slave of the deep south makes his escape into the free north, but even after his escape he can “trust no man”. No matter the color of one’s skin either black or white, Douglass has a deep sense of mistrust in any man, engraved into his person by the years of “the wretchedness of slavery”. Douglass’ diction in his narrative shows how slavery can shape a man into a self conscious and paranoid person. Throughout his life as a slave, Douglass was constantly exposed to conditions in which the only way to survive was to fight for his life. Like the sisters who were raised by wolves -Amala and Kamala- Douglass is not adapted to society and does not trust anyone but himself.
Ohiyesa’s The Soul of the Indian gives a nostalgic critique on the encroachment of white civilization on the Native American culture, citing the parallelisms the two societies share and explaining the reasoning behind Native American rituals. Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass by Frederick Douglass gives a glimpse into the life of a slave, comparing the life of the free and the enslaved, and giving reason to the actions of the slave and slave master. Throughout each book, it becomes apparent that each has a common trait: the white population’s use of religion as a means for their cruelty. To clarify, religion is used as a justification for their respective instances of oppression, both the purge of Native Americans and Native American culture for Ohiyesa, and slavery for Douglass. Although they experience different systems of oppression, Douglass and Ohiyesa see how the corruption of religion can be used by the white majority to assert themselves as masters to their respective peoples.
Mahatma Gandhi once said, “The greatness of a nation and its moral progress can be judged by the way its animals are treated.” People will appreciate the nation if there's equality given to everybody no matter their history of good or bad. What Gandhi says about equality, is not shown in The Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass. This narrative about Frederick Douglass informs the audience about the struggles he had with slavery while growing up in the South. The “Developmental Stages of Human Moral Reason” is a theory developed by Lawrence Kohlberg about the moral thought process.
Introduction The focus of this research paper is the analysis of how the Southern moral code affects the main character from the novel The Unvanquished by William Faulkner. First, there is a description of the story in which the most important events are explained. Then there is a part which contains basic information about the Southern moral code and how it is depicted in the novel. After that, the focus shifts onto the characters, especially the main protagonist and his selection of choices throughout the book and what influenced him.
Mississippi Burning is a film directed by Alan Parker that is a dramatization of the Ku Klux Klan 's murders of three civil rights workers in 1964. In order to apprehend the criminals the FBI take on unethical behaviour, this film makes you ponder on a particular philosophy; does the end justify the means? I believe that the end does not justify the means as there is no justification for unethical or immoral behaviour no matter what the end result may be. When Anderson is desperate to solve the case he takes on an unethical approach and uses an operative, by taking this approach Anderson makes it so that he is no better than the other criminals in Mississippi. This method of obtaining information by using coercion proves to be effective as he is able to gather valuable
Sarty from Barn Burning Barn Burning is a short tale by William Faulkner, which discuss 10 year old boy, Sarty Snopes’ dilemma over assigning priority between his family and social justice, truth and righteousness. The story seems to be revolving around Sarty’s unceasing contemplations about his father’s integrity and justice’s philosophies and system. However, in the story, Sarty’s father, Abner Snope is used to burn the barn and notorious as an incendiary but, Sarty’s views on justice are far different than his father, and it appears that Sarty, however having younger age, possesses deep and upright stances than his father’s peculiar justice view. The entire story based on the son’s dilemma over following his authoritative father’s immoral actions and sticks to family welfare programs or goes for the self-sacrificing and moral attitude, he inherits from her mother.
Douglass encountered multiple harsh realities of being enslaved. For example, the ex-slave was practically starved to death by his masters on multiple occasions. In fact, “[He was] allowed less than a half of a bushel of corn-meal per week, and very little else... It was not enough for [him] to subsist upon... A great many times [he had] been nearly perishing with hunger” (pg 31).
“If I was not innocent… then they were not innocent. Could this mix of motivation also affect the stories they tell? The cities they built? The country they claimed as given to them by God?” (Coates 30 ).
Life as a slave is, without a doubt, a life of agony. In a Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass An American Slave, written by himself, Douglass’s incentive to reach a true state of freedom is in constant growth. Born in Talbot County on an unknown date, Douglass faces the brutal maltreatment and mismanagement of slavery. Throughout the duration of his life, he uncovers the harsh truth of slavery, meanwhile deeming it evil.
A common question one ponders while reading the Poisonwood Bible is, why is Nathan not given a perspective in the narrative. More appropriately, the question should be whether Nathan needs a perspective, and the answer is not only no, but by reading the book in the Orleanna’s perspective, we gain more insight into Nathan than we would have if we were reading in his narrative. Orleanna Price has very minimal narrative, yet has some of the greatest insights about her husband. Right off the bat, she claims “I married a man who could never love me, probably. It would have trespassed on his devotion to all mankind.
Frederick Douglass’s narrative provides a first hand experience into the imbalance of power between a slave and a slaveholder and the negative effects it has on them both. Douglass proves that slavery destroys not only the slave, but the slaveholder as well by saying that this “poison of irresponsible power” has a dehumanizing effect on the slaveholder’s morals and beliefs (Douglass 40). This intense amount of power breaks the kindest heart and changes the slaveholder into a heartless demon (Douglass 40). Yet these are not the only ways that Douglass proves what ill effect slavery has on the slaveholder. Douglass also uses deep characterization, emotional appeal, and religion to present the negative effects of slavery.
I was never born to be a number; I was born to be a human to--hopefully--have an everlasting positive influence on the world around me. But that quickly turned out to be a path I missed. I, along with this generation, have turned into numbers, not humans. Once set in a direction, we have no motivation for change. We have lost faith in our abilities to individually influence anything.