ipl-logo

Ethical Issues In Promised Land

480 Words2 Pages

In the movie Promised Land, two employees from Global Crosspower Solution, Steve and Sue, arrive in an economically struggling Pennsylvania in an attempt to persuade people living in a small farm town to sign off for drilling rights. The ethical dilemma in this movie is fracking. Fracking is the process of drilling and injecting fluid into the ground at a high pressure in order to fracture shale rocks to release the natural gas inside. Fracking is a dilemma. Not only is it highly dangerous, but this is not a safe way to drill these natural gases out without possibly contaminating the groundwater or having these chemicals leak back onto the land. This ethical problem involves the entire farming community, because if these flammable chemicals leak out, then the entire town may be decimated. The water would become contaminated and drinking the contaminated water could lead to serious health issues. …show more content…

They can either sign off the land and receive a monetary reward or not sign the contract and receive no money and have the land taken away regardless. There are two forces in this movie. One is an environmentalist, Dustin Noble, who tries to convince the farmers not to sign it due to the consequences and harm to the land. The environmentalist demonstrated what could happen if the chemicals leak out onto the land. The other forces are Steve and Sue. They are there to convince the farmer that not only signing the contract the best thing that will ever happen to them, but there are no risks from hydraulic fracking. The farmers would also gain money from the profits gained from drilling. They also play on the farmers fear that if they don’t sign the contract, others will and then they will lose out on the monetary reward and have their land

Show More
Related

  • Summary Of A High-Plains Showdown Over The Dakota Access Pipeline

    466 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Time article “A High-Plains Showdown Over the Dakota Access Pipeline” by Justin Worland talks about a controversy over a 1,200-mile pipeline stretching from North Dakota to Illinois. The pipeline is called the Dakota Access Pipeline project and is being built by the Energy Transfer Partners company. Some people are outraged by the pipeline because it contributes to man-made climate change. Others are mainly outraged because the Standing Rock Sioux tribe never agreed to the construction of the pipeline. The leaders of the tribe say that “Washington never considered their concerns, as required by the federal law” (Worland).

    Read More

  • Standing Rock Sioux Reservation Case Study

    760 Words  | 4 Pages

    In 2014, President Obama visited the Standing Rock Sioux Reservation. While there, he read aloud these words from Chief Sitting Bull: “Let’s put our minds together to see what we can build for our children.” Today, it is the children of the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe who have put their minds together to help envision a safe future for themselves and who are leading an international campaign to protect their drinking water — and the drinking water of 17 million people downstream — from the threats posed by the Dakota Access oil pipeline, which would cross the Missouri River less than a mile upstream of their reservation. What you need to know about the Dakota Access pipeline protests Embed Copy Share Play Video3:08 Perhaps inspired by these young people, thousands of people, predominantly from tribes around the country, have gathered in peaceful demonstration and prayer near the pipeline construction site while the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe pursues legal options to protect itself.

    Read More

  • Case Study: The Standing Rock Sioux Tribe

    352 Words  | 2 Pages

    The pipeline is an issue of culture clash; How can a culture such as that held by the Standing Rock Sioux tribe and the Army Corps of engineers be compatible? The Standing Rock Sioux tribe has held certain locations with a very high level of respect in their culture for many years. They have considered this land to have special meaning, even though the United States government has legal ownership that doesn’t mean that the tribe threw out the cultural meaning they had associated with the land just because they did not have legal ownership of the land. The notion of American property law is not considered as relevant to their beliefs regarding the land. This is not to say that the tribe is against American law, it is more to say that perhaps

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of Hydrofracking By Paul Galley

    750 Words  | 3 Pages

    Paul Galley an accomplished environmentalist enters the controversial debate about Hydrofracking in New York, with his article “Hydrofracking: A bad Bet for the Environment and the Economy” published in the Huffington Post on January 05, 2012. Galley states “Net-Net, fracking is simply bad bet” fracking poses serious risk to New Yorkers. Galley, president of Hudson Riverkeeper has worked for over twenty-five years to protect the environment and support local communities, as a non-profit, public official and educator. This piece continues his devotion to protection of the Hudson River, and the drinking water supply of New Yorkers. Galley effectively convinces his audience through his use of appeals to pathos and logos that hydrofracking will have negative impacts on New Yorkers.

    Read More

  • Benefits Of 1938 Farm Control Bill By Mefferd

    476 Words  | 2 Pages

    Soil-conserving prevents droughts and floods since soils weren’t supposed to be chemically treated under this act. The farm control of 1980 also protected the US farm investments and encouraged tenant farmers to stay in their farm or own home although it didn’t really benefit them as much as farmers who owned their own farm. However, it helped many of the nation’s farmers by continuing to increase farmers income by rewarding them for practicing soil conserving. To justify his statement about the escalating farm income, Mefferd illustrates with cotton that “ This last crop, estimated at more than 18,700,000 bales brought $844,000,000. Had it sold at parity price, it would’ve brought $1,160,000,000”

    Read More

  • Rock Sioux Tribe Pros And Cons

    858 Words  | 4 Pages

    This highly debated topic has received widespread media coverage as more than 300 native tribes and numerous environmentalist groups have shown support for the Rock Sioux Tribe in 40 different states (Yubanet). Construction for the Dakota Access Pipeline should be permanently halted due to its imminent contamination of clean water, it’s disrespect to tribal land, and its causation of unnecessary violence towards protesters. Consequently, when reviewing the

    Read More

  • The Pipe Dreams Documentary Analysis

    164 Words  | 1 Pages

    The Pipe Dreams Documentary shows the vast amount of struggle and determination it takes for farmers to win their own land back. It shares a controversial issue on the construction of the Keystone XL Pipeline. “It’s just like a diamond in the world, the Ogallala Aquifer isn’t just Nebraska, it isn’t just the United States, it’s a clean and big lake” states Cornelius Murphy a rancher in Stuart, Nebraska. TransCanada has been requesting the US government for the approval of a 7 billion dollar pipeline known as the Keystone XL. This pipeline would be used to ship heavy crude oil from Hardisty, Alberta to around the Gulf Coast of Mexico.

    Read More

  • Dakota Access Pipeline

    213 Words  | 1 Pages

    The Dakota Access Pipeline is a underground oil pipeline. Part of the pipeline is on Native American territory. To get access to the pipeline, burial grounds of the Natives Americans would have to be annihilated, going against the tradition of Native American culture. In the article,”

    Read More

  • Native American Pipeline Pros And Cons

    533 Words  | 3 Pages

    Over the past years Native Americans had cared for their own sacred lands, the story and religion that their primogenitors had taught them. The Native Americans had still carried the strong belief, that their land shall stay the same as if it should've been until new people had come in from elsewhere to change the land to something we all see outside till this day. However, there is a new project “The Dakota Access Pipeline” that had crossed the line of Native American trust between the new people that had changed everything the Natives had had since their ancestors were still living. No matter what effect the pipeline puts on most people there are some positive causes that can change a person such as protesters to think positive towards the pipeline being built on Indian reservation land. Even if the pipeline can cause many people to have a thought that the pipeline should not be built, only if they can hear from both sides, they can have a second thought and allow the pipeline to be built.

    Read More

  • Standing Their Ground Analysis

    672 Words  | 3 Pages

    Historically, pipelines have been known to burst and ruin natural lands with irreversible damage. Despite the company’s promises that the pipeline could be fixed within minutes, most native Americans aren’t prepared to take the risk. The Standing Rock Sioux sued the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for failing to properly do an environmental study on the effects the pipeline could have on the environment and culture. The president of the National Congress of American Indians says “For far too long, our lands and resources were seen as disposable. All tribes have faced this in one form or another, and Standing Rock has become the symbol for

    Read More

  • Contaminated Water Documentary Analysis

    500 Words  | 2 Pages

    Hearing that these people were having to live off of contaminated water due to the chemicals that were inappropriately disposed was no surprise

    Read More

  • Dakota Access Pipeline Benefits

    812 Words  | 4 Pages

    “Benefits of Governmental Compromise Regarding the Dakota Access Pipeline” Nations all have unique governments and differences necessary for demonstrating successful leadership. Every country needs different assistance from their leadership, such as Rio requiring infrastructure or Somalia lacking political power. Some governments concern themselves with their politicians’ well-being more so than the people they lead, which creates a relevant problem in America. The United States Government can easily forget about Native American Reservations, or even ignore the people living on them. Recently, the United States Army Corps of Engineers has worked on the Dakota Access Pipeline project, which would cross over Native American ancestral lands,

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of The Keystone XL Pipeline

    2026 Words  | 9 Pages

    With the construction of this pipeline going right over the Ogallala aquifer, this puts Nebraska landowners at risk of not only contaminating their drinking water, but their irrigation water for their crops, too. The Ogallala aquifer is “one of the world’s largest known aquifers and the primary source of groundwater for approximately 20 percent of U.S. agricultural production” (Keystone 295). This puts Nebraska land owners at risk of not only contaminating their drinking water, but also “jeopardizing its use for farming” (Keystone

    Read More

  • Fracking Research Paper

    1086 Words  | 5 Pages

    also associated with effects on the respiratory and central nervous system.” If cancer is a side effect from the water contamination, then what makes anyone’s life less valuable than the benefits and profits earned from fracking’s environmental effects? The cost of a life is invaluable compared to the slight sum

    Read More

  • Fracking Persuasive Speech

    943 Words  | 4 Pages

    Drinking water sources have been contaminated with explosive methane, as well as other dangerous substances, such as benzene and arsenic, that can cause cancer and other serious illnesses. Toxic chemicals, as well as erosion and runoff from drilling operations, have fouled

    Read More

More about Ethical Issues In Promised Land

Open Document