Expanding our human geographical knowledge is a positive and significant way of tackling a large scale and ongoing issue in the world today; consumption and commodity fetishism. By recognising time space compression and a global village, the complexity of care and by highlighting various examples of unethical production of commodities we can start to understand the difficulties we, as the consumer, have been inflicting on producers, tradespeople and farmers worldwide. However, correcting the detrimental affect consumers are obliviously having on these lives’ is not a simple task due to globalisation and the capitalist trading world we live in. Looking at procedures of ethical consumption like fair trade are ways which other companies should …show more content…
Marx’s words explain this culture; “Commodity fetishism is the tendency, in a capitalist commodity system, for social relations between people to appear as a relationship between things” (Marx, 1867/1976, p. 164) This spectacle explains how people within the industries of producing and selling commodities see their societal relationships between things, instead of relationships between people. Therefore, removing most aspects of human interaction within this industry, juxtaposing the reality of the situation. The reality is consumption patterns must include social interactions; they deal with the exchange of goods worldwide therefore human cooperation, discussion and relationships must be built up for commodities to reach their destinations. Nevertheless, Marx’s commodity fetishism results in our capitalist fuelled society giving reason for people to consume rapidly without concern for the people involved as, in the words of Marx, “every product of labour” is transformed “into a social hieroglyphic” (Marx, 1867/1976, …show more content…
Fair trade is a global mechanism that has been put in place to help the most deprived producers in the developing world migrate out of severe poverty by generating the scope to access markets in the global north and provide to their consumers. But specifically, on standings that do not exploit them but are advantages to their lives, in every fair-trade scheme it is forbidden to use slave or child labour and employees all must have the right to form a union. Fair-trade allows these producers to feel important and worthy due to the prospects of starting their own business. The Fair-trade movement has reached and aided millions of lives in forty-eight countries across Africa, Asia and South America as well as creating a coffee industry with the most exponential growth in the consumer capitals of the global north; the UK and the USA. This success has been recognised world wide and has been broadcast in the media, becoming documented by governments’ as a trade that is making a difference while also being economically viable. Yet, delving deeper into the economies of fair trade show that the percentage given back to the original producer of the price of the commodity on the shop shelves is extremely little. However, this fault lies with the supermarkets or corporate brands which idealise the commodity fetish and create an unethical pattern of
Also, in document F it says that low prices paid to farmers result in low productivity and poverty in farming communities. Farmers use out-dated farming methods and lack resources to invest in fertilizers or in replacing ageing trees past their peak productivity. It also says that cocoa farmers are often illiterate and that they use outdated methods to farm cocoa trees, so they might be putting more work on themselves. As seen by the evidence, growing cocoa is bad for Côte d’Ivoire because they only get 5% back of each chocolate bar that is bought, but they do 100% of the work. The manufactures get 40% and the retailers get 35%
Food Inc. is an informative and revealing documentary film, aimed to expose the dirty truth of the industrial food industry in America. Directed by Robert Kenner and produced by Michael Pollan, this film informs the American people exactly what they are eating and how it’s affecting them, by painting a more realistic picture of the food industry, than that of an agricultural society. With the use compelling images, such as cattle being raised in grassless, manure infested fields with industrial factories in the background, and stories and interviews from farmers, government officials and victims throughout the film, Food Inc. reveals the horrifying immorality of the food industry, to ignite anger and disgust from the audience toward the unethical
A capitalist society encourages exploitation of workers through consumerism. This can be observed in Mardi Gras: Made in China (2005) by recognizing how use-value, exchange-value and surplus-value in our society promotes exploitation. The documentary provides insight that the usefulness of a thing, or the use-value, is often disregarded when people purchase commodities to keep up with trends rather than for its use. Exchange-value exists within capitalism, where consumers are not as interested at an item’s usefulness. Rather, they are more interested in its monetary value and what they can obtain in exchange for the
School Bus Farmers’ Market: Farm to Family In the first chapter of School Bus Farmers’ Market by Katherine Gustafson, she takes her audience, US citizens, alongside her as she accompanies Mark Lilly on his journey to various farms and acreages to gather a variety of produce for which to sell at a market, in the hopes of decreasing the impact the US food system is making. Mark runs a small business named Farm to Family, providing more fresh and local choices to family shoppers. Gustafson’s purpose in the writing of this passage is not to entertain, but to persuade the reader that while some changes are needed to increase the efficiency of the US food system, simply buying local is not the solution. Gustafson’s argument is effective because
James E. McWilliams takes the opportunity to plead his case against the popular belief that buying food locally can help save the planet in “The Locavore Myth: Why Buying Form Nearby Farmers Won’t Save the Planet” (McWilliams 89). McWilliams finds it necessary to point out that the popular slogan “Buy local, shrink the distance food travels, save the planet” covers the problems with industrialized foods in regards to transportation in his beginning statements. He then follows up by making the bold statement that “a lot of them are making a big mistake” (89). They fail to see that there are other “energy-hogging factors” (89).
Question: ‘Describe the argument that inequality constraints a consumer society' Introduction The term ‘Consumer society’ is a post-industrial label used to refer to a society where individuals are defined by the goods and services they consume. (Allen, 2014, p. 121). Social scientist Zygmunt Bauman (1988) believes that “A consumer society promises choice and freedom to those who, because of their financial and social circumstances, are able to consume effectively”. This theory suggests that inevitably those without the means to consume effectively will not enjoy the same freedom and choices as others producing differences and inequalities.
Materialism is the constant obtaining of commodity while sacrificing human relationships. For decades people have had the notion that obtaining materialistic goods is a portrait of success. In the essay “On Dumpster Diving” Lars Eighner stated that he learned “The first is to take what I can use and let the rest go. I have come to think that there is no value in the abstract. A thing I cannot use or make useful, perhaps by trading, has no value, however fine or rare it may be.”
Commodity fetishism refers to the transformation of human relations formed from the exchange of commodities in the market. Human relations form between people of trade in goods and services in the market expressed in terms of the objectified economic relations among currency. Commodity fetishism allows the ability to transform individuality, conceptual aspects of financially viable value into objective and real things that people think have intrinsic value. (Rubin, 1990,5) Karl Marx states social relation between people assumes in their eyes to form a relation between things therefore commodity fetishism is religious due to the involvement of supernatural status to assume a belief in something not there. Humans use their brains to create commodities
Rather, by including these laws in international trade agreements, we have the potential of improving economies worldwide. Instead of continuing our “Race to the Bottom”, the world can reignite a race to the top by valuing humanity across
Everyone in the world in the world seems to know who the Kardashians are, wherever you look they seem to appear, on billboards, magazines, in salons, on the internet, pictures of them are plastered everywhere. The Kardashian family is popular culture. In this essay I will be discussing consumerism, the role of technology in consumer culture and materialism in accordance to the show Keeping Up With The Kardashians and the Kardashian family, and explaining it through conflict theory. Conflict theory dictates ideas coined by Karl Marx (1818-1833) who has divided the social groups into two classes, the bougeousie and the proliteriate. He states that because of the inequality in the power balance and the bourgeousie having a capitalist hold over the proletariates, they abuse their power over the proletariates.
Very few books in the history of economic thought still render an accurate portrayal of society today. Written 115 years ago, Thorstein Veblen’s The Theory of the Social Class (1899) describes a materialistic society obsessed with reputation and social status, echoing a portrayal of the modern capitalistic consumer culture that defines us today. As Roger Mason (1998), professor of consumer theory states: “Consuming for status has, in fact, become a defining element of the new consumer societies” (p.vii). In his treatise, Veblen’s discusses such a society, in order to portray the ‘leisure class’, the 19th century society that characterized the upper class that formed as a consequence of the Second Industrial Revolution. Such a society uses the consumption of goods and leisure as means of climbing up the social ladder.
This process of recuperation happens in two ways: by converting subcultural signs into mass-produced objects (the commodity form) and by labelling and re-defining deviant behavior by dominant groups (the ideological form). The commodity form benefits from the relationship between the spectacular subcultures and the industries, which is based on ambiguity and the difficulty to distinguish between commercial exploitation and originality, since consumption is an indispensable part of spectacular subcultures and they feed on production and publicity. However, this commercialization and mass production of cultural symbols takes their meaning away from the subculture and makes it available for everyone.
Capitalism is understood to be the “economic and political system in which a country's trade and industry are controlled by private owners for profit, rather than by the state.” In modern society, capitalism has become the dominant economic system and has become so integrated that it has resulted in a change in the relationships individuals have with other members of society and the materials within society. As a society, we have become alienated from other members of society and the materials that have become necessary to regulate ourselves within it, often materials that we ourselves, play a role in producing. Capitalism has resulted in a re-organization of societies, a more specialized and highly segmented division of labour one which maintains the status quo in society by alienating the individual. Karl Marx and Emile Durkheim theorize on how power is embodied within society and how it affects the individuals of society.
This sociological study will analyze the problem of commodity fetishism in American consumer culture. Karl Marx’s theory of commodity fetishism is a major problem in the United States due to the inability of consumers to see the intrinsic value of a commodity. American consumer culture tends to become trapped in the “magical qualities” of a product, which makes them unable to understand the object as it was made by a laborer. This abstraction of the commodity is part of Marx’s analysis of capitalist products that is separated from the labor and become valuable objects in and of themselves. This is an important sociological perspective on commodities, which creates an irrational consumer culture in the American marketplace.
Including farmer loans and forest conservation programs. When customers buy coffee, farmers can have a better future and more stable climate for the planet, and it helps create a long-term supply of the high-quality beans. Since, Starbuck paid a premium price to purchase farmers coffee beans, it is ensured fair transaction and safeguard farmer benefit. Regarding the principles for ethical sourcing, Conservation International has formulated a buying guidelines to address the issues. Called Coffee and Farmer Equity (C.A.F.E.)