Introduction Sweatshops make up the behind the scenes of most wealthy companies; however, this common practice is especially unethical for the employees. The United States General Accounting Office defines a sweatshop as a business that regularly violates both wage or child labor and safety or health laws. Sweatshops offer unfair wages for unreasonable hours, while also maintaining extremely poor working conditions. Employees, whom are sometimes even children, are vulnerable and desperate for a job. Their need for employment inhibits them from realizing the deteriorating state of their health and safety. These practices are inexcusable considering the Universal Declaration of Human Rights was established in 1948. It is nearly one hundred years later, and humans are still being subjected to harsh and inhumane conditions. This issue needs to be addressed in terms of sweatshops in especially underdeveloped countries; they lack the political organization and stability needed to abolish this issue on their own. Developed countries have recognized the lack of ethics concerning sweatshops; moreover, most have instituted legislation that bans sweatshop labor. Labor laws that prohibit sweatshops protect vulnerable and impoverished citizens. Underdeveloped countries lack the organization and stability to ban the horrendous sweatshop practice. Seeing as developed countries hold key roles concerning international politics, the question of instituting international legislation must be
Ravisankar begins his essay by talking about how consumers are constantly emphasizing finding lower prices and that means using sweatshop labor. The problem he identifies is as consumers in Western countries try to find lower prices, we are not helping sweatshop laborers escape their low standard of living. Ravisankar assumes his readers are unaware consumers in Western countries. His purpose in this essay is to educate his readers about the problem of brands’ exploiting their workers. In order to accomplish this purpose, Ravisankar appeals mainly to consumers to pay a higher price to help “improve the lives of sweatshop workers.”
Up until the early 20th century, American labor laws did not protect employees and work environments were not monitored for unsafe conditions. Factories were allowed to run without proper fire exits, ventilation, pay, breaks and even children were forced into labor. These unsafe conditions came crashing down just before the end of the workday on March 25th, 1911 in the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory in New York City. In just under 30 minutes, 146 lives perished (Benin). Today, we call these factories “sweatshops” and they are primarily found in countries that lack laws enforcing proper working conditions.
Labor Practice Paper Angelia Henry PHL/320 May 2, 2016 Bridget Peaco Labor Practice Paper Merriam-Webster online defines a sweatshop as a shop or factory where employees work long at a low wage that is under poor and unhealthy conditions (Merriam-Webster On-line Dictionary, 2016). Sweatshops are factories that violate two or more labor laws to include wages, benefits, child labor or even working hours (Ember, 2014-2015). Companies will attempt to use sweatshop labor to lessen the cost to meet the demands of customers. When we think of sweatshop, we always want to look at third world countries and never in our own backyard. In 2012, the company Forever 21 was sued by the US Department of Labor for ignoring a subpoena requesting the information on how much it pays its workers just to make clothes (Lo,
Through the lens of intersectionality, we are allowed to see that sweatshop workers experienced double oppressions from structural racism and structural sexism that limited their choices of occupations and class inequality that exaggerated imbalanced power between laborers
It is ridiculous that both sweatshop owners and corporations are filled with so much greed that they cannot hold their factories to a certain standard. Cases like the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory and the factory that collapsed in Bangladesh, killing over one thousand people, ever happen. Those who keep their escaping employees cooped up when the building they are working in is about to implode should be tried for mass killings. How can somebody be so selfish, and let profit get in the way of thousands of lives ending? This is a violation of Human Rights.
After viewing the horrors of sweatshop abuse, Clara Lemlich was simply enraged. Her rights and the rights of other working women in sweatshops were being denied, whether it was being overworked, not receiving pay, or suffering from excruciating injuries. It was not right, but what could a small russian girl do? On page 179, it says “ There is no reason for them to work us so hard, to strip our dignity from us. In this country where all are free to speak their minds, it is becoming difficult to say nothing.”
Finn has observed over time that the typical mindset of a consumer in Canada is to prioritize finding the best value over all other factors when purchasing goods. More times than not, the best value item is one that was created in a sweatshop in a Third World country. These goods cost less than those that were manufactured in through fair trade because of what Finn calls, “A vast global strategy designed ultimately to force wages down in Canada and other Western nations” (30). This statement reveals that Western businesses are always looking to maximize their profits, and if they don’t have to pay workers as much if they’re from a third world country, that will help them sell more items at a slightly lower price. Finn mentions that in the third world countries, businesses can get away with paying less wages and not having to worry about the requirements for working conditions and labor laws.
Having traveled to Guatemala and seeing how most people live in third world countries the fact that well know American companies treat their oversees employees so poorly makes me angry. While in Guatemala many of the people there would work multiple jobs and still don’t make enough to be able to support their families. Their working conditions that I saw were terrible and their living conditions were not favorable just like the ones that were showed in the Nike sweatshop video. Although many people are looking for work in these third world countries to support their families, companies need to respect them and give the workers what is deserved. I believe that sweatshops still exist today, it’s changed from over time and they all have moved overseas because there are not many global laws that prevent against the harsh working conditions for these
Cumulatively, these horrific incidents --- which could have been prevented with legally-required health and safety measures – resulted in the deaths of 1,500 garment workers in less than a year. We are currently seeing more media, government, and public attention on the garment industry since sweatshop issues hit the front pages in the 1990s. These catastrophes are the latest evidence of two decades of failures of global corporations’ Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) programs in protecting
The definition of sweatshops is “a shop or factory in which employees work for
How have sweatshops benefitted society or caused harm to it? This research paper will identify and analyse the significance of sweatshops, reasons for its prevalence and compare its positive and negative impacts on society. Literature review A sweatshop is a term for a workplace that violates local or international labour laws, such as providing workers with atrocious working conditions and minimal compensation (New World Encyclopedia, 2008).
“Live Free and Starve” (p. 290) is an essay written by Chitra Divakaruni describing what would happen if child labor laws were passed here in America. She intends to explain to the reader – the American voter – that by passing the child labor law they think it would free the children from the shackles of unruly business owners of third world countries. The purpose of the essay is to describe what is happening to children who are working in factories across third world countries when child labor laws were passed in the House. Divakaruni does so by using pathos, logos and ethos which are supported by vivid description, repetition, and anecdote. In her essay, Divakaruni talks about how the passing of a child labor law in the United States which prohibits the import of goods from factories that uses child labor would affect the children’s livelihood.
In turn, workers will not only better their quality of life, but will also boost their country’s economy through spending. As suggested by the International Labour Organization, “…international labour standards are an essential component in the international framework for ensuring that the growth of the global economy provides benefits to all” (“Introduction to International Labour Standards.”). International labour standards will provide a more equal distribution of wealth as well as indirectly boost the global economy through stabilizing individual economies. In conclusion, regulatory labour laws will not inhibit the growth and development of the global economy, despite the claims made by companies presented in Kernaghan’s video.
It is irrefutable that sweatshops effectively improve economic conditions and provide some opportunity to workers where work may be challenging to find. So, does this make sweatshops acceptable? Although sweatshops are economically beneficial, it would be negligent to ignore what the benefits entail. The same sweatshops employing millions of workers continue to disregard safety and well-being. With conflicting positions towards sweatshops, it is critical to bring change and to identify obligation in the effort to do
It will further elaborate on the ongoing debate about what role laws and regulations should take on the growing issue of sweatshops and child labor, and how they can be improved on without disabling the poverty-stricken foreign workers, who may rely on this type of work to support their families. The proceeding essay will take on the cause and effects as well as a few pros and cons of sweatshops in the United States regarding the beginning of sweatshops and the effects on people involved. A few of the main ideas will include contributors that began sweatshops and how it has evolved, why laws and regulations were implemented and if they’re making a difference or not, as well as the pros and cons that come along with the