According to Ward & Hoelzl (2008), society must work towards recognizing as the new visibility of religion in the field of education. By doing so will require one to investigate religion and belief systems in a learning environment which fosters understanding from a variety of perspectives. Recently, the topic of euthanasia has been discussed in the media and caused much controversy as opponents make the argument is it assisted- suicide, which should be morally wrong, while some proponents in the medical field see it as a way to end one’s suffering before they lose the ability to care for themselves or cause their families to suffer.
Importance
The topic of euthanasia has many complicated elements and moral perspectives surrounding it. By definition,
…show more content…
Taking the example of euthanasia, students would be encouraged to discuss a variety of perspectives about individuals who have recently experienced this issue firsthand. For example, the case of Christy O’Donnell, touches on political and religious lines, as she was a Christian and Republican in addition to a lawyer, who had campaigned for a right-to-die law in California after she was diagnosed with cancer. Her diagnosis was grim, causing her to suffer slowly, losing her ability to speak and experience frequent seizures as her stage IV lung cancer would continue to spread, causing pain to her brain, spine, rib, and liver. As a single mother, she fought for her right to die, as she wanted to spare her daughter the grief of watching her suffer. through months of pain after her stage IV, lung cancer spread to her brain, spine, rib, and liver. Unfortunately, she never lived to see the state of California enact the law (Brother: Right-to-die, …show more content…
2), such tensions regarding the issue that cross moral and religious boundaries are not in common. In fact, they should be expected as in the last fifty years, as the visibility of religions has greatly increased, with “the range of current problems and human rights abuses continuing to remain complex. However, despite such complexities, such controversial issues can still be discussed in a neutral yet safe educational environment. For example, respectful learning discussion of this topic would include individuals stating their beliefs about this practice and why such as religion or other beliefs. However, any statements promoting disrespectful, insensitive, or hateful comments. Additionally, each student must report and summarize their peers’ beliefs, writing both positive comments and possible reasons why they may not agree. The characteristics of such discussions can in no way include a student telling another individual that their perspective is wrong or unintelligible. Additionally, in the event speakers are brought into the classroom to discuss the practice of euthanasia such as individuals with terminal illnesses or extended family members of a person suffering from a terminal illness or recently passed from one, students will be prohibited from making any negative or insensitive comments. Questions may only be asked regarding why the individual opposes or is an advocate for a particular
Assisted suicide is an ethical issue which is reliant on a person’s values, morals, religion, and experiences. Debated this topic can bring out strong emotions and opinions pulling away from the focus of this paper which was simply to describe view points from both sides of the spectrum. There are many nursing implications that are associated with assisted suicide. Among these is the importance for nurses to be aware of their own beliefs about end-of-life care. Self- awareness will prepare nurses for challenges they will face when dealing with death.
Death is unnerving. However, to those fighting unwinnable battles death may seem to be the only way to escape the pain. For the patients in agonizing situations, nurses are there to provide comfort and care. The patient and nurse form a unique relationship and, therefore, the nurse is typically the first person a patient deliberates the topic of assisted suicide with (Maher, 2007). This issue has been strongly deliberated since 1997 when Oregon passed a law termed the Death With Dignity Act.
One of the more pressing social/medical issues of recent times has been euthanasia, also known as physician-assisted suicide, or the right to die. Proponents of human euthanasia propose that those with a terminal illness should have the right to a clean and painless death with the assistance of a physician, rather than the drawn-out and painful natural death that some will otherwise experience. Being one who was raised in a Christian family, I am morally opposed to suicide in all forms, and I strongly believe a human life is sacred enough that a physician should not be granted the permission or power to take it. Many oppose this act for various reasons: religious in nature, moral grounds, or by medical tradition. Some argue that euthanasia does in fact contradict a professional code of ethics.
A very controversial topic lately is that of euthanasia. Physician assisted suicide is a very debatable ethical issue because people have different morals. I argue that in some cases it is ethical and others it is not. I believe that if someone is going to die, that there is absolutely no cure available that if they want to die via physician assisted suicide that is their choice. One of the main reasons that people chose to die via PAS is because they are in pain and don’t want their families to see them miserable.
The possible legalization of euthanasia can cause a great disturbance in how people view life and death and the simplicity of how they would treat it. "There are many fairly severely handicapped people for whom a simple, affectionate life is possible." (Foot, p. 94) As demonstrated, the decision of terminating a person 's life is a very fragile and difficult one, emotionally and mentally. Nevertheless, it’s a choice we can make if it is passive euthanasia being expressed.
Physician assisted suicide fulfills the patient’s request and puts the power and choice in his or her hands. Although some religious beliefs are strongly against both euthanasia and physician assisted suicide, by legalizing physician assisted suicide, many people can benefit and it should not harm the religious population. Along with the legalization of physician assisted suicide, strict guidelines should be followed in order to protect abuse and unnecessary
Controversy The controversy addressed in this paper is the debate surrounding the legality Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide, predominantly in Canada. A sensitive and conflictual topic for many, the debate on euthanasia has been ever growing since it is conflictual with the preservation of human life and its effect on many individuals surrounding the procedure. Description Euthanasia, sometimes referred to as active euthanasia, is the ending of another person’s life in order to relieve suffering and at the request of the patient, is carried out by a physician through the use of lethal injection (Boudreau & Somerville, 2014).
Assisted suicide is a rather controversial issue in contemporary society. When a terminally ill patient formally requests to be euthanized by a board certified physician, an ethical dilemma arises. Can someone ethically end the life of another human being, even if the patient will die in less than six months? Unlike traditional suicide, euthanasia included multiple individuals including the patient, doctor, and witnesses, where each party involved has a set of legal responsibilities. In order to understand this quandary and eventually reach a conclusion, each party involved must have their responsibilities analyzed and the underlying guidelines of moral ethics must be investigated.
Euthanasia, also known as assisted suicide, is the act of permitting the death of hopelessly sick or injured patients. This is never suggested by the caretaker rather than requested by the patient or their family. Few areas such as the Netherlands have already legalized this practice. This debate, as split as a fork in the road, is over whether or not this approach should be legalized worldwide on stances regarding religion, ethics, and self choice. I see this as being extremely unethical on both religious and social morality levels.
Morally it does not matter if I committed the act myself, but I’m giving consent to take a person’s life. I will talk about euthanasia and the advantage and disadvantages of it and if I allowed the patient to get the
“A society that believes in nothing can offer no argument even against death. A culture that has lost its faith in life cannot comprehend why it should be endured,” is what journalist Andrew Coyne had agreeable said regarding a man who murdered his own daughter who was diagnosed with cerebral palsy (Coyne). Today’s society is filled with many controversial issues and debates in which most people take a side based on personal, cultural, or social circumstances. When it comes to the controversial topic of euthanasia, among many other argumentative subjects, it seems to be a pretty contrasting subject that is up for debate, not only in the United States, but around the world. Some people would see the option of euthanasia as an unethical practice.
Terminally ill patients have right to die through refusal of medication such as withdrawing a respirator and refusing food and water until dying in about ten to twelve days because of their religion. Being a Christian has a lot to deal with this, especially physicians because the tradition doesn’t allow murder and that only god decides what to give and what to take. It’s hard for them to take their own life because of their own religion. Christianity has a role in both patients and
The idea that every human life is sacred and, therefore, killing an innocent human being regardless of the circumstances is unacceptable, has long dominated the public mind, making various issues like euthanasia a topic of heated debate. Euthanasia, also commonly referred to as mercy killing, can be defined as the act of putting a person to death or allowing to die in order to end pain and suffering. There is a lot of controversy regarding this practice, especially when it comes to the ethical aspect of the issue. From the Utilitarian perspective, euthanasia is an act that needs to be considered in terms of whether or not it brings the largest amount of good to everyone involved.
In a few nations there is a divisive open discussion over the ethical, moral, and legitimate issues of euthanasia. The individuals who are against euthanasia may contend for the holiness of life, while defenders of euthanasia rights accentuate mitigating enduring, substantial respectability, determination toward oneself, and individual autonomy. Jurisdictions where euthanasia or supported suicide is legitimate incorporate the Netherlands, Belgium, Luxembourg, Switzerland, Estonia, Albania, and the US states of Washington. CLASSIFICATION OF EUTHANASIA Euthanasia may be characterized consistent with if an individual
THE EUTHANASIA CONTROVERSY Summary Euthanasia has constantly been a heated debate amongst commentators, such as the likes of legal academics, medical practitioners and legislators for many years. Hence, the task of this essay is to discuss the different faces minted on both sides of the coin – should physicians and/or loved ones have the right to participate in active euthanasia? In order to do so, the essay will need to explore the arguments for and against legalizing euthanasia, specifically active euthanasia and subsequently provide a stand on whether or not it should be an accepted practice.