The New York Times has been a well-established organization since 1851. It’s primary goal of informing and educating the public has been achieved through printing newspapers and recently through online media. As a major media source, it has won the most Pulitzer Prizes out of any newspaper. Ethical reporting of the news has been a priority of the New York Times, enough so that a guide was released detailing the standards of the New York Times journalists. This, as well as many newspapers and articles that have been released in order to detail the rules of protecting the honest nature of the newspaper, have enforced and re-enforced the integrity. Staff members are permitted to engage in activities outside of their jobs with the New York Times, …show more content…
It is imperative that the news received is unbiased and completely factual. However, it is also important to note the right of citizens as well as journalists to express their opinion. In order for the people to get a complete understanding of the world’s situation, there has to be a balance between a diversity of opinions surrounding an issue, and the unbiased facts. It also must be clear what the facts are as opposed to the opinion of the creator of a piece. Furthermore, the issue of objectivity becomes more complicated when considering how and citizen can now spread information, their opinion, and completely fictitious stories and claim they are all true. With the use of social media, these fake stories may spread faster and to more people than the corrected, true information. Traditional media and journalism separate opinion and fact. Social media allows for anybody with an opinion to spread anything and disguise it as fact. This is a major issue as the spread of misinformation could dangerously alter the public’s perspective of a topical issue. However, to prevent certain opinions being spread could infringe on the right to free speech. It is a delicate issue that must be addressed soon. It is a dangerous precedent to censor certain facts for fear it will contradict an agenda. However certain facts, while true, do not show the whole truth of a situation. …show more content…
In the past, opinion based arguments were separated entirely from the news. Current events had its own category along with weather, politics, sports, etc. Nowadays, these categories can all be blended into one website, or be completely separated and have certain sites focused on certain topics. Furthermore, it is even debated as to what the role of the journalist is. Journalism needs to be reliable as most people would agree. The New York Times separates the news and its opinions. However, it is natural for a writer’s opinion to bleed into his or her work. This is not necessarily a bad thing. Neutrality and objectivity are incredibly important when regarding fact, but the public should be exposed to a diversity of opinions. In order to fully understand a situation, one must attempt to understand another's point of view. This has been made a great deal easier with new technologies. It supports an age of tolerance and openness to those different from what one known. Additionally, if opinions are censored, it could cause a situation where certain groups are targeted, and only a select few are actually able to publish and show their opinion to the public. People with minority opinions would be affected at a greater rate than the popular opinion as well, thus affirming the same beliefs without ever challenging them. This could be
Have you ever listened to a news story and thought it sounded one-sided? Or have you thought the news didn't seem to report the whole story or the most important aspect of a story? Journalists possess the power to influence a whole group of people with their work. When writers input their opinion, they generate bias. Consecutively, this influences a reader's reaction to a topic.
When we look at the main surface like topic we se books being burned. But as we take a deeper look into what the books truly represent we see more than pages with ink, we see peoples opinions and beliefs. What truly makes somebody unique? How they think and what they believe. But as we see these books being taken away we see that in deeper meaning the censorship is attempting to take away people's opinions and identities so they will just follow what the government wants them to believe.
After all, news programming is meant to relay facts and inform of recent events. Does that mean undertone opinions should be adapted? When attempting to be the “first to report” a story, the lack of hesitation may allow for a story to be aired without all the facts. In the recent high profile events involving law enforcement, many times it initially appears the officer did something wrong. Viewers are incited, accusations fly, protests begin, and violence erupts creating a whole new situation for law enforcement fueled by media (Carlson, 91).
Censorship is dangerous, and too much of it can lead to an inevitable destruction of our
The public opinion strongly affects the main stream news sources who work very hard for their stories. With the wide use of social media rather than the main stream sources of news the result may be a loss of jobs for the people in this career. People are getting rid of traditional news and going to social media because it is hands on and convenient. However older people still depend mainly on television and newspapers for their news.
There are many reasons why various organizations and people are censoring different kinds of topics; some people say it’s the right thing to do and others think its controversial to the first amendment.
The phenomena of impartiality and objectivity are the most popular objects for discussion in the circles of journalists and media experts nowadays. There is controversy whether these theoretical concepts have practical application and whether they are essential elements of modern journalism. In this case it is significant to understand what elements of impartiality are topical for contemporaneity and whether there is a need to strive for impartiality at all. First of all, it is important to understand the meaning of the word «impartiality».
Media bias is a real problem. When people are not aware of the facts alone, rather interpretation of facts, they are being manipulated. Media should report facts concisely and promptly with as much accurate information as possible. When networks allow to dictate how they report news, there is a much greater chance to be biased. When networks accept monetary incentives to report in a specific manner, there is a much greater chance to be biased.
The media plays an important role in influencing societies views and opinions about current news, issues and events that the world face. Within the emergence of new technology like the internet and cell phones, it has such current events and current news to be easily accessible to a global audience and to be consumed in real time. The Paris Terrorist Attack is a great example for the statement above because as soon as it happened, the attack instantly went viral all over social media like Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, Blogs etc. This essay aims to explain the growth of social media and specifically look at the impact it has on religion. It will discuss whether journalists should be religiously and culturally trained in order to report fairly
Each year numerous amount of people become a social media user. The eMarketer website estimated that by 2019 “there will be around 2.77 billion social media users around the globe, up from 2.46 billion in 2017” (1). A great deal of those users utilizes social media to communicate their opinion to other users; as a matter of fact, these users might change their perspective a certain person might have on a topic. Social media is a marketing tool, therefore people utilize those social media platforms to pursue, and even manipulate the public to think in a certain way; hence, why social media can influence the public opinion.
Truth will always remain the same, and if the governing bodies or authorities feel that hiding it would help the society in general, then they are downright wrong. But in saying that there should be complete elimination of censorship, is also a flawed idea, because even though it is a powerful tool, it can also be misused. Freedom of speech should not be mistaken with freedom to hurt or insult, the factor of respect for other people is very crucial in the case, but in saying so, it doesn’t mean there should be restriction on the voices of people, because, the topic is all about one’s perspective and it is very
As a result, people have created a vicious cycle in which they search, read, believe, and share what they have read, without considering the reliability of the information and news. Technology has influenced communication and journalism; as a result, the media has adopted a business model based on clicks and advertising. The combination of people 's need for information and the greed of news corporations have allowed for the proliferation of “fake news,” a term that has gained importance in the last two years. Fake news is “completely made up, manipulated to resemble credible journalism and attract maximum attention and, with it, advertising revenue” (Hunt, 2016). News has the power to alter people’s perceptions which can impact their decisions related to economy, democratic process, and their lives and jobs.
One of the major problem in our society may be the over flooding of fake news. Fake news can be identified as the false information within official-looking websites and often can be misleading for readers. Fake news are commonly known for their inconvenience and bias information, those fake news gains tons of attention due to their over exaggerated title and content; and highly spottable on various types of social media such as Facebook, Snapchat and Twitter. Once the fake news go viral and trending the people who created them will obtain money from advertisement. In order to stop or avoid fake news, you should recognize them by their traits.
Thanks to social media, access to information from all over the world has become easy. Because of the developments that social media has reached, it is no longer necessary for us to rely on receiving information from second hand sources. We are now able to access the main source of the news ourselves such as an eyewitness or video footage of the event. This can insure that the information we receive is reliable considering that many secondary news sources tend to be politically biased.
People around the world wants to keep up with the latest news to know what’s happening around the world. There are many ways of accessing the news such as the old fashion way, newspapers, magazines, radio and television then there are the technological means to get the news. From the internet or social media like Facebook and Twitter. The informal way of accessing news is the local “grapevine.” This like any news spreads like wild fire but it is not reliable in that it is laced with personal opinion.