In society people depend on there leaders to make decisions that support the accomplishment of a common objective. Based on this notion, to some degree one can evaluate the success of a leader through the quantity of their followers. But I realized that the amount of followers does not constitute a great leader. Their can be instances where a leader is excellent in communicating to their followers things that they want to hear, which keeps them connected. However, at times leaders do not actually mean or do things that are expected of them.
He revealed that the relationship of these dimension and ethical leadership and the outcomes from it varies trough the dimensions. Fairness and power sharing are said to be having positive relation the employee’s behavior in the organization. Furthermore, it is founded that ethical leadership give positive impact to the leader effectiveness, employee effectiveness, satisfaction of the employee regarding the leader and increase the trust to their
According to Janis (1972), the illusion of invulnerability is the group mentality that a certain decision cannot be wrong. This illusion makes the members of the faction neglect the obvious dangers of their decision due to having excess optimism and confidence in their ability (Janis, 1972). To prevent this symptom, it is important for the group to involve experts who can evaluate the risks of its bad decisions and assist it in making more informed verdicts. 2. According to Janis (1972), the group may be inclined to believe in the morality of their group and make them ignore the moral and ethical consequences of the decisions they make.
By showing initiative you are being a leader and that is a trait common to being very professional. Also, the definition of initiative is having the ability to assess and initiate things independently. Plus, by showing initiative you will be able to handle things and be expected to keep handling things on a higher note. This is why I choose to have initiative is an example and key part to being very
According to Lunt (2009), as the experiment unfolds, it is evident that the participants are involved in a complex situation that may result to the learner being harmed. Consequently a personal value, that of respecting and not harming others comes into play. Therefore, the experiment in general places the participant in a dilemma. If they obey the authority figure, they go against the social norms that sanction is doing no harm to others. On the other hand, if they decline to harm the other person in the experiment then they would be acting against the social norms where good citizens defer to legitimate authority.
Introduction Individuals need attention and expect to be understood and respected in their workplace. They also like to belong to an organization in which honesty, righteousness and trustworthiness is the common culture. To create such a milieu, an ethical leader is required whose actions reflect his/her own ethical capabilities and honesty as well as dignity in all aspects of life. In fact, ethical leadership includes administrative measures through which the dignity and rights of humans are respected and fulfilled. Since ethical leadership plays an important role in creating a healthy work environment and improves organizational and individual outcome[3, 4], it is of great interest in leadership studies.
With both nonprofit and public the servant leader being able to have foresight can prevent danger negative imaging from the public as well as promote positive imaging from the public if they are able to properly predict situations based on the current situation. Servant leaders may have issues with the follower’s perception of them being a leader as well as not being able to devote large amounts of time into the follower because of the organizational needs. Using multiple styles of leadership is ideal but when work in public and non-profit organization the important factor to remember is that the goal can not be accomplished with out both the leader and the follower no matter the style of
Waldman and Galvin (2008:327 ) argue that other leadership theories lack the element of responsibility and that it is key because responsibility constitutes “…the heart of effective leadership.”. They also view responsibility as lying at the heart of effective leadership, adding for emphasis that “to not be responsible is to not be an effective leader.” They also argue for a relational approach to responsible leadership of which more
Integrity is the key component to gaining a substantial and true following. Through integrity, one creates this image or reputation that embodies everything that person believes and intends to spread to his followers. So, if one lives a life with integrity, becoming a leader will occur more naturally. Integrity is the foundation of leadership in many ways. As Maxwell points out the following points about integrity in leaders: integrity builds trust, has great influence, facilitates high standards, creates a solid reputation, and produces credibility.
This theory is probably the most essential motivation theory due to its perspective insight into human nature by interpreting the human behavior and actions. By applying this theory into its motivation and rewarding system, AirAsia would be able to motivate its employees as well as satisfying their needs. This is because AirAsia would have benefit by creating a workplace or environment that meets the needs of the employees such as food, shelter, health and job security, friendship and family as well as acknowledgement and recognition. This will then lead to a higher self-esteem and self-actualization among the employees which will results in unleashing the full potential of the employees in their daily business operations. This theory was widely popular among practicing managers including AirAsia’s managers because it is easy to understand and