Medical Ethics Case Study Essay

The legal precedent for informed consent establishes a patient’s right to determine what is done to their body(6). The process of consent protects patients against battery and unwanted medical procedures. (5, 7). Furthermore, it safeguards a patient’s right to autonomy and self-determination. (8) The ethical purpose of informed consent seeks to shift the decision-making away from the clinician and towards the patient(7).

This process is called informed consent and includes the nature of the decision, reasonable alternatives, risks, benefits, and uncertainty to alternatives, assessment of patient understanding, and the acceptance of intervention. When the patient is able to provide informed consent, the treatment options should be followed because of the legal standards and ethical principle of respecting the patient’s autonomy. In other ways, if the patient unable to provide informed consent due to unconsciousness, the legally authorized surrogate may be able to provide informed consent (Koppel & Sullivan, 2011). Therefore, the patient’s autonomy is the first step in determining the withdrawal of life-sustaining treatments. As the informed consent law indicated, an adult with thorough mind patient is the sole intermediary what should be done on his/ her own body either to accept life-sustaining treatment or to refuse at all as long as he/ she understand the consequences.

The goal or purpose of medicine is to restore people, who have been compromised by illness or injury, back to a reasonable state of health. On a level regarding phonetics, health in English means “wholeness” which is derived from the Old English word hal meaning “whole”. (The Purpose of Medicine) In order to restore health and make patients whole again, physicians have to make decisions for the best method of care. Some of these decisions propose moral dilemmas. When a physician encounters a difficult decision, the physician is responsible for making an ethical decision; or, the physician is responsible for making the right decision.

The four core ethical principles that are called into question in the movie “Miss Evers’ Boys” are autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice. Autonomy refers to the right of the patient to function independently and the ability to self-direct. This means that patients are entitled to decide what will happen to them, and if deemed competent, they have the right to either consent to or refuse treatment. All nurses and healthcare personal would be required to respect the patient’s wishes, even if they do not agree with them. Beneficence is the core principle that refers to the act of ‘doing good’ and advocating for the patient.

You should be a good listener. Whether you are a doctor trying to obtain a medical history or a nurse observing a patient, you must be able to handle information without the need for patients to repeat themselves unnecessarily. • Be Outgoing. You must be able to work harmoniously with the different personalities, including patients, physicians, and other co-workers. • Be Adaptable.

Charlies doctors did not act ethically when they performed surgery on Charlie. Ethics is a well-founded standards of right and wrong and involves feelings, laws, and socials norms. Although Charlie was exited about getting surgery to become smart and the doctors were nice enough to perform on him, they did not follow the correct steps to ethical thinking.Before performing surgery on someone you are suppose to ask important/mandatory

Ethical Principles In Nursing Ana Is Autonomy means to regulate itself, this moral principle as the basis for the nurse in providing nursing care by way of appreciating the patient, that the patient is able to determine something for him. The nurse should involve patients in making decisions about the nursing care given to patients. prinsip autonomy based on the belief that the individual is capable of logical thinking and able to make your own decisions. Adults are deemed competent and have the power to make its own, vote and have different decision or choice that should be appreciated by others. The principle of autonomy is a form of respect towards a person, or is viewed as agreement does not force and act rationally.

When following the legal requirements, as it is the individual's right to refuse e.g. any support or treatment and ensuring the individual are aware and obey with legal requirements. 3.3: Describe how to establish consent for an activity or action. In a health and social care setting it’s important to start the consent of the individual when providing them with any kind of care or support. It’s essential to include the individual with any decision-making, it is your job to make sure that the individual does not feel left out or ignored.

I believe the most compelling reasons to give patients maximum autonomy over decisions regarding their care is because patients should have self-ownership over their own body, and the quality of life. may seem dependent on the patient’s interest over the physician’s decision. The definition of patient autonomy is to have personal freedom of one 's decision that is free from both controlling interferences by others and from personal limitations that prevent meaningful choice. While on the other hand, a physician’s duty of “beneficence” is the hippocratic oath in which action that is done for the benefit of others such as help prevent or remove harms or to simply improve the situation of others. I believe patient autonomy over weighs prioritization over the medical professional’s duty due to the fact the main concern overall is over the patient’s health.

A healthcare administrator must use good judgment. They must be able to adjust their behavior to each situation, but must understand that conflicts will occur between different expectations in the code of ethics. Other expected behavior for a healthcare administrator is that one shouldn 't misrepresent one’s qualifications and shouldn’t misrepresent facts when communicating with other professionals during business activities. Overall, one’s behavior must set them apart from the others and their actions must show that they believe in a code of ethics and are a true representative of this profession (Bianca, 2017).