In the earlier days, psychologists who made a decision to choose the counseling specialty are now worried about the focus changing which seems to be happening today. Counseling psychology’s main goal was to help people get a clearer understanding of who they are, make better choices, and to create a plan for their lives. Today, counseling psychology is closer to the area of clinical psychology which helps people with mental illness and disorders, changing behaviors or personal problem solving. There is a loss of identity of the counseling psychologist which is leaving some critical human needs untreated (Tyler, 1992). Today there are many aspects of counseling.
More focus and attention is required where group therapy is concerned because different member may have different opinion or may behave differently. Sometime complex situations or contradictory attitudes may arise in case of group therapy. Also there are unique ethical issues in group therapy. The therapist has to conduct the sessions in groups and also maintain the safety of all the members of the group. AMA had developed certain guidelines for counselling therapies and they promote quality training in group so as to enhance the awareness on ethical issues which hinder group counselling.
Gamble summarizes this by stating, “With any new tool, technique, or communication method, psychologists need to consider the ethical implications of its use in addition to its clinical utility” (292). Information storage is not the only problem telepsychology faces, it can also run the risk of having connectivity issues, which effects the quality of counseling. Katherine Drum, a researcher for East Carolina University, states counseling services done over text and email will take longer than traditionally counseling (311). For these reasons, many experts argue that telepsychology will bring a divide between patient and
Although there are advantages, there are also some disadvantages. First, Narrative Therapy is relatively new theory which means there are not much research articles that support using this therapy as a stand-alone theory. Second, there are some discrepancies when it comes to using this theory with families since family therapy might want to work on the family as unit. It might be difficult to use narrative therapy when dealing with the relationships aspects of the
While cognitive psychology deals with learning and knowledge, clinical psychology portrays the treatment and research of mental and emotional disabilities, illnesses, and ailments. Although, the most common concept of modern clinical psychology is often associated with the crazy and weird people of society, they would only be half right. Clinical psychology deals with those kind of people and the average person. Most often clinical psychology is used to help with emotional and behavioral issues, but it is also used to help the family and friends caring for the individual understand to help them most efficiently. Chiefly clinical psychology is used treat mentalaiments such as ADHD, anxiety, eating disorders, depression, or autism.
There are different forms of relationships formed in the field of psychology between psychologists and clients. In the modern day, dual relationship and multiple relationship have become a crucial topic due to their usefulness in solving a client 's problem. During my research on the topic, I discovered a few posts that explained the differences between dual relationships and multiple relationships with the main term being the intent. This paper will establish the differences between the two forms of relationships, examples in each relationship, and any forms of violations according to APA code of ethics. In this section, I will discuss dual relationship in psychology with an example in a life situation.
The American Psychological Association (2010) ethics code defines a multiple relationship as “one in which a practitioner is in a professional role with a person in addition to another role with that same individual.” In the present paper, the role boundaries play in therapeutic relationships is explored, as well as boundary crossing and violations. Boundary crossings can enrich therapy, serve the treatment plan, and strengthen the therapist-client working relationship. They can also undermine the therapy, severe the therapist-patient alliance, and cause immediate or long-term harm to the client (Pope & Keith-Spiegel, 2008). It is reasoned that when clinicians engage in multiple relationships with their clients, ethical dilemmas may arise,
There are many difficult challenges that have to be endured on the way of becoming a marvelous psychiatrist. The life of a psychiatrist is not easy, many factors like college and balancing their work life along with their own personal life, is a lot to undergo. A large amount of people are clueless on the difference between a psychiatrist and a psychologist. They both are roughly the same occupation because their goal is making people feel better, but there are major differences too. A psychiatrist can prescribe medicine to patients, and they spend a lot of their time talking about medicational help and course treatment (Psychology vs.).
Throughout life I have come across many people who I have disagreed with because our opinions were different. Even when someone had an opinion that I didn’t agree with I was always able to understand why they felt that way, so in other words I was empathizing with them. I definitely think that in counseling psychology you have to empathize with another person because it allows you to see a problem through another person's eyes or in a psychological case, through their patient's eyes. Having empathy gives you the ability to help people cope with their problems because you understand why they feel a certain way. The last, but not least important skill that I feel counseling psychologist need to have is patience.
The article argues that there are external factors such as environment and behaviour and intrinsic factors such as believes, competency, identity and mission that distinguish people from the label they are given of ‘good’ or ‘bad’ in the teaching profession. Korthagen in this article states that, the model of levels of change may offer a helpful framework for thinking about this question. It clarifies the variety of relevant aspects that should be taken in to account; however, it must be taken into consideration that a ‘good teacher’ will not always show ‘good teaching’: although someone may have excellent competencies, the right beliefs, and an inspirational self and mission, the level of the environment may put serious limits on the teacher’s behaviour. Qualities as empathy,