Ethics Test 1 Ashlyn Grano 1. Ethics is: D) the study of what is right and good 2. Value is: A) an assessment of worth 3. Didactic Stories are: A) stories told to teach a moral lesson 4. Parables are: B) allegories meant to teach a religious lesson 5. The concept of an artificial person that turns on its creator is called C) the golem 6. Non-normative Ethics is: D) factual investigations of moral beliefs 7. Normative Ethics is : B) an attempt to determine what moral code to follow 8. Moral Nihilism is: B) belief that no moral values exist 9. The concept that morals are dependent upon culture and vary, and therefore there are multiple “right” actions depending on the culture is: D) Ethical Relativism 10. The theory that argues that although morals vary, there are some fundamental universal truths is called: C) Soft Universalism 11. Which of the following is not a problem with Ethical Relativism: C) not academic enough 12. According to James Rachels, which of the following would be a universal …show more content…
People take care of their children 2. People do not lie 3. People do not commit murder. The problem with this theory that there is some kind of “universal moral” can be debunked by saying that it is just logic. For example, for a society to succeed people need to reproduce therefore they need to take care of their young. The problem with the second rule is that there is nothing really morally wrong with lying to people. Robin Hood lies and steals from the rich so he can provide for the poor and that makes him a hero. The third rule isn’t necessarily true because men and women kill people in war everyday, but the army is highly praised for their brave efforts when they return home. It seems as if the rules only apply to “your own people” as long as you are raising your kids, not lying to people in your tribe, and not murdering people in your tribe then you are a morally right
Society’s opinion of morality is that everyone needs to only do what is right for the good of the
Annie Fischer Trimble Hours 4 and 6 Flowers for Algernon Argumentative essay Argumentative Essay Ethics are referred to as the right and wrong things a human being does. They include what society thinks is good and bad. Secondly, ethics are referred to as the study and production of a person's ethical quality. Charlie Gordon did not have the pleasure to be treated with dignified ethics.
Although cultures throughout the world are distinct from one another, along with their own unique customs, there are set moral rules that every culture follows which plays a big role, in order for society to continue forward. Cultures are very different as described by James Rachels in “Morality Is Not Relative”. Cultural Relativism means that there are no set moral codes due to the fact that distinct cultures have distinct ideas when it comes to morals. For example, Rachel's supports his argument, by using multiple ways different people lived. Rachel’s points out a rarely discussed situation about Eskimos practicing infanticide.
William R Madden Ethics: Good Reasoning 1. Introduction A. Anyone may have an opinion, but if it is likely to be accurate, that opinion should have relevant information used to support it. 2. Arguments A. A collection of information used to support a theory.
Ethics modify how you act on a day to day basis. They are standards that should be followed, but are not always followed. An example of ethics not being used is Charlie Gordon and his operation in the short story "Flowers for Algernon". Charlie Gordon wasn't necessarily bright. He had an I.Q. of 68 and struggled with things such as reading, writing, and math.
The topic that I am interested in and would like to dedicate my graduate study to is moral cognition and decision making, the formation of moral codes, and morality as it affects criminality. I would like to investigate which forces have the greatest impact in the formation of one's moral codes from how a population as a whole views morality to an individual’s personal experiences alter their own understanding. I would like to compare moral codes across cultures to determine if morality is immutable among all human beings or if culture shapes our morality. For example, there are many documented differences between collectivist and individualist societies and their understanding of various issues. Would it not be reasonable to assume that these cultures differ in the area of morality as well?
(446) Pragmatic naturalism is “the process of improving the old functions and creating new ones in response to new problems…resulting in a long term procession of small and large moral changes in diverse and changing populations.” (446) These progressive changes Philip Kitcher discussed in his book, The Ethical Project, includes examples of change as being “…the earliest legal codes, the idea of exact retribution—eye for eye, tooth for tooth, life for life…” (140) Skeptics to ethical objectivity claim that moral progression cannot occur because it is a process that requires a slow change that does not happen at once. The philosophers conclude that Kitcher’s view of pragmatic naturalism is valid and rejects the skeptic’s points. They base their conclusion on two
Developing from the reasoning of (Russ Shafer-Landau, p.p 13), it is clear that there is a difference between normative ethics and metaethics. Normative ethics are those values that develop from within a personality and are always employed whenever ethics are breached. On the other hand the metaethics is basically the diverse elements that are considered crucial for building positive ethical believes. (Shafer-Landau, p.p 29), also brings forward other moral ethical elements such as the moral error theory, the desire-satisfaction theory, ethical particularism and the doctrine of double effects. All the above elements are crucial for shaping ones ethical perspectives and inclinations leave alone resolving ethical issues within a society.
1. Introduction – ethics – what are they? Ethics (or moral philosophy) is the kind of philosophy that define concept of right or wrong conduct. In practice, ethics try to resolve questions of human morality, by explaining concepts of good and evil. Ethics, culture, morals – are bind together, they are embedded.
The divine command theory, utilitarianism, Kant’s duty defined morality, natural law theory, and Aristotle’s virtue ethics are the five types of ethical theories. The divine command theory states that what is morally right and wrong will be decided by God. Utilitarianism states that “Action “A” is morally right if and only if it produces the greatest amount of overall happiness. Kant’s duty defined morality states that what is important is acting for the sake of producing good consequences, no matter what the act is. Natural law theory states that people should focus on the good and avoid any evil.
The concept of ethics entails systemizing, justifying, and recommending right and wrong conduct. It involves in practical reasoning: good, right, duty, obligation, virtue, freedom, rationality, and choice. Humanity has questioned this concept of ethics and ‘good’ for as long as it has survived, as it deals with real-life issues such as “what is morally right and wrong?” and “how do people ought to act?”
Normative ethics is crucial in decision-making in the criminal justice system and it is based on the notion that one should act morally using reason to determine the suitable way of conduct of self. Ethical relativism is part of normative ethics and it argues that what is morally right or wrong varies in a great deal from one person to another. The standards of conduct and methods of doing things differ from one society to another and there can never be a single standard of conduct for all societies; we must make ethical decisions therefore based on each situation. Relativism requires that we judge an individual who acted immorally by the standards of his culture and not our own (Cook, 1999). It is effective in just
“Ethical objectivism is the meta-ethical view that there is at least one objective moral standard and that some
The data suggest that the majority of human beings from all cultures and religions or no religion agree on a common set of moral standards. So, universal moral norms do exist . What is the source of universal morals? If we theorize that evolution, not religion, leads to common morals, then, our theory
As children, we were taught by our parents that it is wrong to lie, cheat, and steal. As we grow up and enter into the real world with some knowledge of right and wrong, we see, first hand, the importance of ethics as well as its complexity. The role of ethics in our society and in an individual’s life is very necessary because it has a large influence on today, as well as the future. We need to learn about good ethics because they guide our decisions, make us who we are, and determine our future.