Sri Lanka, the beautiful island of gems has moved on to its 6th year after the successful victory over the militant group Liberation Tigers Tamil Eelam. The conflict of 30 years between the Sri Lankan government and Tamil separatist groups has not only created devastating emotions but also a history of its own. Sri Lanka thus in 2009 saw the beginning of a new history of a post-war era. It is a moment where government has to prove as well as take up the responsibility to create integrity and harmony in this small little island. And to build a new nation with integrity, the focus should be on the root causes which lead to a 30 year old conflict. This chapter gives a brief history of the conflict and the root causes for it. Introduction The major reason for the ethnic conflict in Sri Lanka can be traced back to its colonial history. As was seen …show more content…
The Sinhalese are supposed to have arrived in Sri Lanka in late 6th century BC, probably from northern India. Centuries later, Buddhism was brought in by some missionaries sent by Asoka, the Mauryan emperor from India. The religion grew around Anuradhapura and Polonnaruwa. The Tamil speaking population of Sri Lanka can be classified into two groups. The main group is the Sri Lankan Tamils whose ancestors arrived from southern India over more than a period of two millennia. While the other group the Indian Tamils or Plantation Tamils also known as Hill Country Tamils or Estate Tamils. These were the people whose ancestors were brought from India by the British to work on plantations down south in Sri Lanka. Background of Ethnic Conflict There were varied reasons for the ethnic conflict in Sri Lanka. Some of them include the ethnic politics, interpretation of past and history, language, education, land and employment. According to a report by World Bank , the root causes of the conflict
The South's Foreshadowed Defeat It was well recognized that Abraham Lincoln took his presidency serious. Including the goals that he purposed to accomplished and tried his best to fulfill them. Two important reasons from Abraham Lincoln (which eventually led to the Civil War) were: forming unity among the union as well as freeing the slaves. The disagreement and distinct regions between the Union (North) and the Confederacy (South), overpowered the similarity they had of being from the same country. The Civil War was one of the most deadliest wars in history that lasting about four years.
By the mid-nineteenth century, the Constitution had been put into the fiery crucible that was the issue of slavery, littering the antebellum era with political controversy. The national structure framed by the Founding Fathers in 1787, initially intended to bring unity, was now the primary grounds from which the question of slavery was bringing sectional conflict and national disharmony as a result of mass-moral compromise. The Constitution of the United States was instituted to encourage the unification of the stark sectional divide within the nation. However, rather than achieve its purpose, the Constitution was contorted and employed by both sections to further their envisioned future of the country.
The increased migration of African-Americans to northern cities because of the decline in agricultural opportunities in the South and later for the war effort caused increased racial tension and riots as the black population had more of a presence in the close proximity of the urban environment. The worst riot during the war was in Detroit during the summer of 1943 where a fight broke out in Belle Isle Park between black and white men. Rumors of the fight and of rape spread and with it the riot did as well lasting for four days with 25 African-Americans and 5 whites dead and two million dollars of property damage occurring. Riots were obviously terrible occurrences but by occurring during war time when the government was most aware of domestic discontent that could harm the war effort, the riots acted as
The Syrian Civil War has been prolonged further than ever anticipated. With casualties reaching the hundreds of thousands, this war has left permanent impacts on families across all of Syria. The civil war in Syria was sparked from the Arab Spring which consisted of countries in North Africa and Middle East. It then escalated to widespread violence emitting from the Syrian government, and resulting in what is now the Syrian Civil War. With all of this starting from a peaceful protest and now resulting in a violent and messy war, is it really worth it at this point?
The Civil War is identified as the first modern war in American history; this war was historic in many different aspects. No war in previous history had two armies of such great magnitude confront each other on the same battle field, armed with deadly and more accurate weapons. Furthermore, the casualties in this war were immense in comparison to anything our country had experienced as both fighting sides were made up of Americans. Lastly, politics played a large part in this war; political leaders had the difficult task of "[mobilizing] economic resources" and continually motivate society to fight.
The Native American tribes and the United States have a very long and devastating past. The english came from overseas and started taking the Natives land which they didn’t like. The Colonies did barter with some tribes, but fought for territory with most other tribes. The French even became allies with the Natives to try to defeat us in war. We befriended the Cherokee and a couple other dangerous tribes though in defence of their tactics.
Many view the Western Powers as innocent in this conflict, however this article states otherwise. It is valuable because one person/country’s opinion should not count more than another’s. • Limitations – This source is opinionated, one-sided and biased against the Western Powers as it is written from the perspective of a person intentionally questioning the norm. It states radical opinions as facts. This secondary source is not reliable because it could be based on speculation and twisting of facts as there is a lack of evidence.
Many people suggested that potentially fixing the problems through peace should be gotten rid of, and violence should be the only
This struggle raises a lot of questions; what are people doing about the situation right now? , what are the different organizations involved, if any?, in what areas are people working and fighting?, and what kind of tactics are they using?
7. Sepoy Rebellion (542) The Sepoy Rebellion occurred during British control of India. The East India Company enforced its economic dominance and political authority with sepoys, a name for Indian soldiers. However, these sepoys revolted in 1857.
Theoretical Framework: Conflict Perspective: Conflict perspective focuses their attention on society as a whole. Conflict theorists see society as in a continuous sate of conflict between groups and classes. He struggle for power and income is a continuous process but one in which many categories of people appear as opponents-classes, races, nationalities and even the sexes. Society is held together through the power of dominant groups or classes. The shared values, which functionalist see as glue for holding society together, do no realty form rue consensus; instead this is an artificial consensus in which the dominant groups or classes impose their values and rules upon rest of the people.
People can best respond to conflict by staying positive because it affects their physical and mental health in a helpful way and can affect others around you in a positive way. It can help someone greatly in stressful situations when their life could be at risk. Positive thinking is one of the best ways to respond to conflict because it can affect your physical health in a constructive way. The Mayo Clinic Staff states that a positive attitude can, “Increase a person’s life span, can help them build up resistance to the common cold and cardiovascular disease, have better physical well-being, and better cardiovascular health”. Staying positive is somewhat crucial to a person’s health.
Antagonism can be defined as active hostility or opposition. India has a long tradition of religious tension. One of the most significant sustained religious conflicts has been between the Hindus and Muslims. This essay will focus on the causes of the Hindu-Muslim antagonism, and will at same time assess the quote of Sir S.A Khan. 1.
In this paper, I have attempted to present an understanding of Pakistan-India conflict by using constructivism theory of international relations. There are many reasons other than strategic reason causing this conflict like differences in ideologies, norms and beliefs. There are also cultural differences between these two nations. 2. Pakistan-India Conflict an overview South Asia is considered a region of great importance in the world.
The notion and the meaning of conflict have evolved with time. Before Coser, conflict was seen more as a source of social change and disintegration. However, the conflict theory we are referring to here is not necessarily an infliction of violence or atrocities, but a conflict that arises due to unequal distribution of power and resources. Theorists consider power to be an important element of conflict theory. For instance, who uses power or where is power located are two of the main concerns of conflict theory.