Importance of Theoretical Considerations in Analyzing Qualitative Data As part of our academic course, this term-paper has been given to us for the further practice and learning on writing term-paper and to understand the importance of theoretical considerations in analyzing qualitative data. Research is a process of building up a thought or idea into knowledge or fact with the help of precise procedure and strategy, to legitimate its truthfulness and accuracy. Creswell states that – “Research is a process of steps used to collect and analyze information to increase our understanding of a topic or issue”. A broad definition of research is given by Martyn Shuttleworth – “In the broadest sense of the word, the definition of research includes
Therefore, it could be argued when comparing and contrasting the two approaches, it is crucial to look at the advantages and disadvantages of the two. The main advantages of the experimental method is the ability to control what each participant experiences and this allows researchers to test precise and accurate hypotheses and draw conclusions about how one variable affects another. The main disadvantage of is that it cannot replicate or reproduce the complexity of real life and it can miss social rules and other factors that could establish whether a bystander intervenes or not. The discourse analysis, on the other hand can capture a richer and more varied picture of people’s experiences and looks at people’s actual experiences. However, it cannot provide general rules about human behaviour that could be applied to more than one
In order to confirm that this project is applying an inductive qualitative approach, the researchers behind this investigation have selected a research topic and formed a research question. The in depth interviews this project is going to analyze is going to be an open-ended interview, as the researchers would like to have different perspectives on the topic, and let the respondent talk from experience, therefore instead of structuring a whole set of consistent
He conveyed to readers both the practical and theoretical and ways of approaching theory generation. Additionally, the author tried to bring to light on how sensitizing concepts provide starting point for building analysis of data to generate a grounded theory. As a research method, it’s appropriate for identifying and explaining phenomenon and social processes. The author clearly explains dynamics of theoretical framework in his study. This clearly gives the readers a line of reasoning and basis as to why we should move grounded theory further into postmodernism.
Ogburn’s goal was to make sociology a science and not to improve the world we live in but to acquire new knowledge. Multiple arguments were made about the various methods used in sociological research. The three main methods are ethnography, surveys, and experiments. An ethnography basically gathers in-depth information of people by going into the community using participant observation or interviews. Even though this method provides an extensive understanding of social processes it also has restrictions such as the research results may only apply to that specific group studied.
Since the study I will be doing involves a case study, the narrative research theory seems the most logical direction as it corresponds with the purpose of my study. 3.4 HOW DOES THE THEORY REST ON EPISTEMOLOGY AND WHICH EPISTEMOLOGY IS MY THEORY BEST ALIGNED WITH? Narrative research theory involves the collection of data via interaction/interviews. The narrative theory data is sourced from an individual’s experience (story) and then interpreted by the researcher. The researcher comes to know about the phenomenon through interaction with the study subjects (Sandelowski, 1991).
This does not exclude a quantitative approach being associated with a post-positivist approach. In contrast, for a researcher who favors interpretive, knowledge is a matter of interpretation (Schutt, 2009) so that the quest for understanding the complex world of lived experience demands that the researcher interact with the research objects/participants to get the viewpoint. The investigator favored a post-positivist approach since he believes that human knowledge can be challenged and modified in light of further investigation. Following is a description of the methodology that was followed for this
Overview of Qualitative Research Qualitative Research is mainly about exploratory research. It is used to gain an in-depth understanding of underlying reasons, opinions, and motivations. Qualitative research is also used to discover the patterns of thought and opinions, and explore deeper into the problem. Qualitative data collection methods are vary using unstructured or semi-structured techniques. Some common methods include focus group, individual interviews, and participation/observations.
This idea works along with perspective one idea that our reasoning skills may not be up to par, assumptions might be wrong or experience consequences that were unexpected. Conclusion In conclusion, the main idea of this paper is to answer the question, what is critical thinking and why is it so difficult. Based on research everyone has their own understanding of critical thinking but throughout this research paper it can be understand as the process of doing in-depth research about a certain topic that involves exploration and analyzation of collected
Interpretivism does not accept a single idea of reality, but accepts multiple ideas which stand to the participant’s point of view. Interpretative research aims to find out how the understanding of the everyday’s reality of each individual is kept and produced through one’s experiences. Therefore Interpretivism focuses on finding out how people make their own meanings of their experiences lived in their own environment (Braithwaite & Schrodt,
According to Conley, Social Scientists have a set of typical approaches that they pursue in investigating any question that may arise. These rules are known as research methods. They are tools utilized to explore, describe, and explain various social phenomenons in a principled approach. The Two research method that I chose that Conley described in this textbook are Historical Methods and Experimental methods. Experimental methods seek to adjust the social scene in a certain manner for a given example of people and after that track what results that change yields; regularly include comparisons to a control group that did not experience such an intercession.
This is a resource used to help find credible and scholarly information. Without learning how to properly search for your essays topic, you could potentially get false information. That is why learning the how to use this was very helpful within this course. Within the subject of finding reliable sources, we also learned how to properly cite these sources found. When writing a paper, you need to find research that backs up your statement.