Rape and sexual assault are serious situations that can change a person’s life, both victim and attacker, leaving them with feelings of denial, regret, sadness, anger, etc. Often, people think they will never be able to receive closure and peace once they have been attacked. But speakers Thordis Elva and Tom Stranger, in the TED Talk, prove that to be incorrect. Through their speech, Elva and Stranger are able to speak up about their personal experience with rape, creating strong and meaningful arguments for the audience to hear. By using appeal to ethos, irony and parallelism, they are able to express how it is possible to resolve the pain that comes from sexual assault. When appealing to ethos, Stranger establishes how he is a normal …show more content…
By establishing his background, Stranger is able to connect with the audience members. Elva uses appeal to ethos by establishing the relationship her and Stranger had, like everyone else did in their teenage years: “I was 16 and in love for the first time. Going to the christmas dance together…”(01:30). By including this in the speech, she shows how a normal person, such as herself and audience members, can be the victims of sexual assault. The incorporation of irony in the speech amplifies how sexual assault can happen to anyone, anywhere and any time. Elva includes irony to describe how “Tom wasn’t an armed lunatic; he was my boyfriend. And it didn’t happen in a seedy alleyway, it happened in my own bed” (02:51), emphasizing how rape can happen in deceiving ways that may not seem real. Lastly, Stranger includes parallelism in his part of the speech to highlight how the blame of rape is often on the woman, the victim. “Far too often, the responsibility is attributed to female survivors...far too often, the denial and running leaves all parties at a great distance from truth”(15:56). Including “far too often” repeatedly creates a stronger argument of how it is important to find closure from sexual assault so the people involved can resolve
Rape is something that many warn us about and tell us to be careful about. What many do not realize is that it can happen in a matter of seconds and there is nothing that can be done to stop it. Often it happens, but people find it difficult to report it because of the person who committed the crime, this was the case in the book Missoula by Jon Krakauer. The book begins with a woman, Allison Huguet, who was raped by a member of the football team in the University of Montana, Beau Donaldson. This case was not the first incident to happen in this city and the author does a great job in letting his readers be aware and know it has happened before.
The reference to the articles being published and other examples are used as a reference and reasoning technique to show and build credibility toward the movement, its existence, and support from many. The reason technique is used to build credibility towards the article and the primary argument that the movement is being misused. By providing this examples, it justifies the argument that the author has presented. The reference is also showing the audience that there are many stories out there and again building on the issue that sexual assault is happening all around us. Furthermore, the authors use of not only ethos technique here, but also uses pathos in order to humanize the topic of sexual
When the attacker finds out that the victim spoke up they will likely use scare tactics as a way to frighten them, such as, when Andy confronted Melinda in the janitor’s closet. This dose of reality is important for rape victims to encounter before experiencing it first-hand because if it was not expected it can deter them from continuing to speak up. Along with intimidating aspects of coming forward, Anderson also shows the reader that moving on is a possibility and that if the victim is persistent it will get better when people see the
Rape myths are at the center of the problem of how rape and sexual assault cases are looked at, and treated as in society. Rape myths vary, some excuse the rape, others try to minimize the severity of the situation, while others doubt the act even happened in the first place (Levit and Verchick, 196). Some examples of rape myths include: a victim was “asking for it,” a victim’s previous sexual history, regretful sex is not rape, a woman’s “no” means “yes,” and women lie about rape all the time. Rape myths are targeted towards women, not the rapist. Despite, rape myths being proved false by empirical evidence, they are still prevalent in society.
Defense attorneys in cases of sexual assault often “attack the victim’s credibility - the time-honored rape defense that so often results in an acquittal” (Krakauer 136). Diminishing the victim’s credibly and highlighting the standing of the accused are both methods that defense attorneys, like Donaldson’s lawyer, use to win cases of sexual
Last week he uses ethos trying to give that credibility of someone to trust someone That is very knowledgeable of the situation and how someone that went through the system of jail understands how the people that come out of jail that are trying to be restored back into society and how they understand what the people are going through. trying to show that man this is trying to help those because when he came out of jail with no one tried to help him back on his feet trying to give him his right so you trying to give that favor that he didn't
The scene where Jim Dwyer a prominent journalist, and distinguished published writer spoke out proclaiming that he wished he would have been more skeptical as a journalist applies the use of ethos by the filmmakers. The scene starts off with the female detectives that are covering the case briskly walking around working at the crime scene with the voice of Dwyer speaking about the crime. Then it cuts to Dwyer setting speaking directly to the camera. As Dwyer sets there he says "I look back at the jogger case and I wish I had been more skeptical as a journalist. A lot of people didn't do their jobs, Reporters, Police, Prosecutors, Defiance Lawyers.
When questioned about rape, especially most women, they might think or even picture a stranger coming out of a dark place to assault someone. But in reality there’s more to it. According to the University of the Sciences in Philadelphia, “About half of all people who are raped know the person who attacked them. This is known as date rape — forced sex that can happen not only on a date, but also somewhere like a party with someone the victim may know, like, or even be interested in.” Furthermore, social critic and feminist, Camille Paglia, has been discussing this persisting issue about date rape with a personal stance that many women may disagree with.
The Rhetorical Elements of Barack Obama’s Speech President Obama uses rhetorical appeals throughout his speech. These rhetorical appeals help prove that each an every student should try their best in school. President Obama stated in his 2009 “Address to America’s Schoolchildren” that each student must take responsibility for his or her own education. President Obama uses many examples of ethos, logos, and pathos in his speech. In Obama’s 2009 “Address to America’s Schoolchildren” he has examples of ethos.
Ethos can also be observed within the speech, to show facts and statistics. Wiesel uses the ethos appeal within his speech to establish his credibility with the audience. For example, Wiesel uses his own experience as examples. He states, "In the place that I come from, society was composed of three simple categories: the killers, the victims, and the bystanders. During the darkest of times, inside the ghettos and death camps...we felt abandoned, forgotten."
Sexual assault is very common and very difficult to overcome for most, in another article the girls that claimed to be raped talked about their process of overcoming the claimed assault they all have different experiences and different ways of coping with it again showing how different the reactions can
He uses ethos to tell the audience how serious he is and how
She feels bad leaving her friend at the restaurant, but that doesn’t stop her from leaving with a stranger. That’s when she meets another creepy stranger in the parking lot in his car a few feet from her “it was a boy with shaggy black hair; In a convertible jalopy painted gold” (Oates, 389). Who turns out to later be her
Co-founder and CEO of Apple Inc, Steve Jobs, in his commencement speech at stanford university, illustrates three distinguishable points of his life. Jobs’ is very successful in his approach to inspire the graduates by speaking on the experience and insight he has gained. Jobs has a simplistic yet elegant tone and diction to convey his hardships to communicate how much life has to give and teach us in an inspirational way. Jobs begins his speech by dethroning himself as the well-known self made billionaire to create a connection to the graduates. He starts by putting the audience on a higher plateau with “I am honored to be with you”(1) and “ this is the closest I have been to a college graduation”(2) and when speaking of himself and his speech, he states it is “No big deal”.
How Simon Sinek Persuade Audiences that the Secret to Success is a Reason Why In the TED talk, How Great Leaders Inspire Action, the presenter, Simon Sinek, a “leadership expert,” claims that all great leaders and innovators have one thing in common, they all have a reason why they do what they do. He convinces the audience that his claim is correct through a relatively balanced use of the three Aristotelian appeals: pathos, logos, and ethos. He gives specific facts and examples, to show his audience how his claim has worked for history’s greatest individuals and organizations. Finally, he uses rhetorical devices such as amplification and parallelism to strengthen his argument.