Africa went through significant changes due to the civilizing missions carried out by European imperialists throughout much of the late 1800s and the early 1900s. From these “civilizing missions,” we can concur those missions were carried out to further European imperialist efforts for their own benefit with the rationalization of their racist and aggressive actions. The evidence in this chapter suggests that European rule was conducted in detriment to African peoples by presenting an almost Darwinian form of “superiority” that white imperialists wished to “improve” the African continent with. This was achieved by justifying their actions by the using racist rhetoric that Africa was “uncivilized,” introducing Christianity to Africa, and ignoring critics of imperialism.
The Western world wished to justify their imperialism by claiming that Africa and its people were underdeveloped as a society. In the late 1800s, Rudyard
…show more content…
Economist J. A. Hobson (1858-1940) wrote, Imperialism, in 1902. This piece criticized imperialism and claimed that the rush for colonialism was due to economic needs and unregulated capitalism. Although not entirely true, Hobson did make a point with his condemnation of white imperialism. Another critic, Joseph Conrad was also against imperialism and claimed that Europe was selfish for wanting to “civilize” Africa. Critics knew that Europe had more internal problems that were making true progress, but at the same time were degrading foreign spaces. There was a double-standard in place that failed the ideology and social progression being made in Europe. This was a time where governments, liberties, and equality was progressing, but behind the scenes, these same “progressive” nations were committing racist and discriminatory actions for their own benefit. Despite the criticism, European nations persisted with the imperialism and did so with much technological and aggressive
The book serves as a sharp contrast with the deception of Colonists as well as a symbol of solid realness within a fantastical dream where truth is impossible. When describing the book, Marlow’s diction are highly positive, using words like “honest”, “humble” and “simple”. The direct expression and singleness of intention serves as a contrast with the lies the Colonists tell to conceal the reality in Africa. Europeans justify their bloodthirsty conquest as something they did for a greater cause. In 1876, at the Geographical Conference on Central Africa, King Leopold justified “To open to civilization the only part of our globe which it has not yet penetrated, to pierce the darkness which hangs over entire peoples, is, I dare say, a crusade worthy of this century of progress” (Cleary).
The main reason the Europeans imperialized Africa were their cultural and social beliefs in ethnocentrism. They believed “[the natives] needed European help, reform, or civilization” (Document K). The Europeans considered the Africans savages
As Frederick Lugard's explains the Europeans taught the Africans how to conduct their own affairs with justice and humanity. This demonstrates that European imperialism was harmful because it shows how the Europeans were not acknowledging that Africans could teach themselves how to do many of the things that European people were doing their
By 1914, only Ethiopia and Liberia remained free from colonial rule and its damage in Africa (Doc 6). Those under European rule saw imperialists as rapacious exploiters. The demands and needs of Africans were not addressed by their ruling nation. Instead, their rights, liberties, and dignity were stripped to feed the greedy mouth of imperialist rule. Africans could not find the supposed benefits brought by Europeans to be worth the loss of their life and freedom.
Martial Henry Merlin believed that Europe was entitled to occupy territories in Africa to “civilize” them. (Doc. 6) His speech was given to justify the colonization of Africa. Most Europeans in this time would agree that it was a virtue for a “fully developed race” to develop countries full of “backward peoples who are plunged
The idea that anything Africans could do would be “disgraceful” to Europeans conflicts with the ideology set forth by Early’s
So Europe invaded Africa, took possession of Africa, and divided Africa into colonies of Europe. The period of invasion, lasting some twenty years, was more or less completed by 1900. There followed a longer period, between sixty and ninety years, of direct European rule, called colonial rule. This was a time of profound upheaval for all of Africa’s peoples. It brought irreversible changes” (4).
Imperialism can impact a nation in many ways; some of the changes may be good for a nation, and some of them may be bad. However, why did Americans and Europeans seek to imperialize Africa and Asia? How was the age of Imperialism depicted? And how did Americans and Europeans react to their nation’s imperial actions? Americans and Europeans believed it was their “white man’s duty” to civilize and educate the people of Africa and Asia, who were beneath them and not as civilized as them.
The first reason for what caused imperialism in Africa was cultural beliefs. In document B, John Ruskin says, "This is what [England] must either do or perish: she must found colonies as fast and as far as she is able." John Ruskin says this because he is inferring to finding other faraway colonies. John Ruskin's statement shows they have national pride and want to find other colonies.
Some people lived in larger, centralized states, while other lived in simple village communities. Islam was one of the most widespread religions in Africa before missionaries came to convert them to Christianity. This might have been a more positive influence if the Europeans hadn’t viewed the Africans as a people in need of refinement and guidance instead of understanding and respecting their culture. However, one benefit of Europe’s growing control of Africa was that the transatlantic slavery slowly came to an end, but in East Africa, slavery continued to run rampant. Although the end of much of the slavery did rid Africa of much exploitation, it continued in other ways including the harvest of copper, ivory, and other resources taken from the Congo, civilians forced into hard labor for little compensation, and little to no control of the government was given to native
“The White Man’s Burden” was what justified the European actions in Africa. The origin of this ideology came from Rudyard Kipling’s poem “The White Man’s Burden” (Document 6). The Europeans believed that it was their duty and burden to “civilize” the African natives.
To justify Apartheid in South Africa Geyer points out that despite the freedoms enjoyed by native Africans they have not accomplished any major landmarks of civilization, thus guidance by White Europeans is a necessity for native Africans to flourish. This is an extremely common narrative colonizers establish in order to justify their actions; the colonizers appear as the “saviors” that will lead the disillusioned “savages” to true enlightenment. However, as we see time and time again throughout history these so called “saviors” actually operate to the extreme detriment of the
Moreover, Western civilization became the ideal civilization, and became way superior to African “civilization.” As a consequence, African tradition became perceived as primitive, outmoded, and sadly not welcomed by the rest of the world. Unfortunately, a lot of Africans experienced a trend of a dying out culture. (2) It can be implied that even the Africans’ self-perception dropped because the only lifestyle they knew was suddenly taken away from them and they were taught that it was substandard. Therefore, the indigenous inhabitants of the colonies, the Africans, had to adapt to a new, “superlative” culture and view it as more sophisticated than theirs.
Which only fabrications of the capitalists do not seek to justify the plunder of colonies! Through a variety of printed works permeates the thought that before the arrival of the colonial masters Africans were completely or almost completely devoid of the capacity for social progress. This idea was developed in every way and hard spread. Only 30 years ago, a colonial official called Africans "savages, whom history has passed. " History of Africa depicted as standing outside the tides and ebbs of "waves of the highest civilization," which to a certain extent contributed to the development of Africa's population is doomed to stagnation.
The European neo-imperialism differed from previous empires in the way that it was driven solely driven by nationalism and pride. Europe’s conquests continued around the world, their extreme ability to colonize countless territories was called into question. The idea arose that colonization was not only a competition, but also a duty for Western