ipl-logo

European Treaties Vs First Nations Essay

642 Words3 Pages

First Nations and European approaches in regards to historical events have differed in most cases. The Europeans have approached many events with policy in mind where as the First Nations people viewed many events with a spiritual lens. In regards to the treaties, First Nations people viewed them as a spiritual process and a sacred act. The treaties were supposed to be formed for both parties benefit. It is shown that the European people did what they could to ensure the First Nations lost more than they gained. The European people were after the land of First Nations people and in return offered fishing and hunting rights, education and much more.

The treaties were a means of obtaining more land in the governments favor from the First Nations. “In instructing the first Treaty Commissioner Weymss Simpson, Joseph Howe noted that “It should therefore be your endeavor to secure the cession of the lands upon terms as favorable as possible to the government, …show more content…

With the first treaties, there was a language barrier and this caused some miscommunication; however, there was a treaty revision in treaties one and two. “After much dispute, and after the discovery of notes regarding additional “outside promises,” Alexander Morris prepared a “Revision of Treaties One and Two” in 1875 that formally recognized some of those promises, including agricultural assistance” (Stonechild, 2017). Later on however, the Europeans felt resistance from the First Nations people as they felt they were being lied to or misled. The First Nations people sought new ways of negotiating treaties and decided to push back. They were refusing to be taken advantage of. “Treaty Number Six generated more controversy than Morris had anticipated. He had not expected the Cree to block survey crews and telegraph lines. Saulteaux from Treaty Four tried to disrupt the proceedings and discourage the signing of Treaty Six” (Stonechild,

Show More
Related

  • Analysis Of Colonists Encroach On The Stanwix Line

    147 Words  | 1 Pages

    The document “Colonists Encroach on the Stanwix Line”, records a speech made by a Native American, John Killbuck to the governors of three separate English Colonies. He tells of the English and other European Settlers invading Naive American lands base on their own greed and compete against one another. The English haven’t always agreed on bringing about peaceful compromises on the lands they and other European Nations have conquered, instead, wars erupted and whoever were the victors reaped all the rewards, land that consisted of Native American tribes. The Native had tried to make a peaceful compromise of a land dispute by setting a boundary between Native American tribes and the English Colonies. However, with the increase of Europeans flooding

    Read More

  • How Did Joquips Acquire A Lie Of The Mohegan Indians?

    1604 Words  | 7 Pages

    On October 9, 1806, Joseph Bird Joquips, a 70 year old Native Indian from the Mohegan Tribe, petitioned the State of Connecticut General Assembly for a portion of the land in Connecticut that was divided among Natives in the Mohegan tribe. He emphasized his devout military career that began in 1758 during the Seven Years’ War to convince members of the General Assembly to allot him a portion of land that belonged to the Mohegan Indians. While Joquips had already rightfully possessed a piece of the land because he had lived on it prior to European presence, the Europeans did not recognize his authority to the land; and thus, forcibly seized control of Native lands so that they could distribute it as they saw fit. It was not important for Joquips to possess a piece of land, but to have the Europeans recognize that the land belong to him. Thus, this petition represented Joquips manipulation of the European system to secure a piece of his tribe’s land with hopes to collect the land for the Mohegan tribe piece by piece.

    Read More

  • Was Lord Dunmore Establish An Attack On Native Indians In North America?

    1215 Words  | 5 Pages

    Don’t forget, these treaties were only an agreement. In March of 1775, The Wilderness Road project started and would eventually travel through a notch in the Appalachian Mountains called the Cumberland Gap. This fundamentally changed travel through the

    Read More

  • Research Paper On The Williams Treaty Of 1923

    935 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Indigenous groups involved in previous treaties found that the government of Canada and Ontario were not living up to their promises and that settlers were encroaching on non-negotiated land in their northern hunting territories. The government then assigned a commission in 1923 that was comprised of Sinclair, McFadden and Williams (Hall, 2011). The treaties were then negotiated as people had already settled on the territory of the eight communities of Indigenous people that were involved. The Williams treaties were comprised of two separate treaties each looking at different land masses, the one directly related to our geographical location being the second signed between the commission and the Mississauga communities, this land stretched from lake Simcoe to the shore of Lake Ontario. The Williams treaty also included the land that was originally within the gunshot treaty, but unfortunately did not include the Mississaugas of New Credit First Nation whose ancestors who were a part of the original treaty.

    Read More

  • Native Signatures Of Assent Summary

    1123 Words  | 5 Pages

    X-Marks Native Signatures of Assent written by Scott Richards Lyons explores the history of the American Indians in the United States. Further, Lyons goes into depth about boarding schools, assimilation, treaties, broken promises, and tragic events that caused harm to millions of American Indians. In this paper, I will discuss how the White Europeans came to the United States and basically assimilated the tribes that were located here before the “discovery” of the Americas. Next, I will define the terms treaty and x-marks. Lastly, I will explain how unjust everything is, in particular when we talk about the rights, and properties that tribes had before the Europeans came to contact them.

    Read More

  • Differences Between The French And Indian War Dbq

    413 Words  | 2 Pages

    In 1742 the chief of Onondaga of the Iroquois Confederacy knew that his land that the people shared would become more valuable than it has ever been. (Doc B)The reason for this was because the “white people” also known as the Americans wanted the land of the chief. The feelings of the Chief result in complaining to the representatives of Pennsylvania, Maryland and Virginia,

    Read More

  • George Washingtonivray's Treatment Of Native Americans

    799 Words  | 4 Pages

    McGillivaray was an Creek leader who was easy for Washington to communicate with for McGillivray spoke english. Washington’s idea of the Native Americans was that they needed to be regarded as independent nations, and with that idea, Washington thought of his first solution to the “Native American Problem”. “He envisioned multiple sanctuaries or “homelands” under tribal control and federal protection.” Chief McGillivray disagreed with this proposal which forced Washington to think of a new one. This time Washington came up with a treaty that read “The United States solemnly guarantee to the Creek Nation, all their lands within the limits of the United States to the westward and southward of the boundary described in the proceeding article.”

    Read More

  • Comparison Of George Washington And Indian Policy

    915 Words  | 4 Pages

    After McGillivray was open to trade negotiations, the Treaty of New York was created. The treaty promised the protection of Creek Indian land boundaries against land seeking settlers and also assured them annual payments in money and trade goods (226). Although a treaty was created, neither side could keep their promise. McGillivray had also signed an agreement with the Spanish before he died because “the Creeks’ interests were best served by maintaining creative tension between the American and Spanish authorities” (226). The agreement that the United States had made in the Treaty of New York could not be kept as well as it had proved to be unrealistic.

    Read More

  • Gregory Ivan Dowd

    471 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the 1992, book A Spirited Resistance: The North American Indian Struggle for Unity, 1745-1815 Gregory Evans Dowd takes an academic approach to Eastern Native American history. Dowd follows the same study identity and cultural transformations by focusing on two Eastern Native ideologies known as nativist and accommodationists. Elaborating on the outlooks, he argues that the monograph does not tell “history from the Indian point of view” and does not focus on a “single Indian outlook.” Advancing his argument the author states that his monograph provides historians with the many perspectives surrounding the Native American history in the seventeen and eighteen hundreds.

    Read More

  • Western Expansion And Its Effects On The Lives Of Native Americans

    394 Words  | 2 Pages

    Before the 1860’s the native americans were living in peace until the Colonists attacked. The Western Expansion of 1860-90 greatly affected the lives of Native Americans, due to the powerful role

    Read More

  • Indian Removal Homework

    1075 Words  | 5 Pages

    Although this treaty explicitly stated the Indians’ rights to land, history- and even the Act itself- proved that Americans followed it very loosely, if at all. The Trade and Intercourse Act seemed to dampen the consequences of violating Indian land rights since it included the phrase, “not exceeding,” when referring to the jail- time and fees that any invasive Americans had to pay. 3. Andrew Jackson proposed moving the Indians because he wanted to end the tensions between the Federal and State Governments concerning Natives, to condense the Indian population in a single expanse of land, to open the area between Tennessee and Louisiana to the whites, and to prevent Indian and American conflicts. In the second paragraph of his Message to Congress in1829, Jackson said that the United States should move the Indians because it would put “an end to all possible danger of collisions between the authorities of the General and State Governments on account of the Indians.”

    Read More

  • Cynthia Van Zandt Analysis

    682 Words  | 3 Pages

    Throughout the seventeenth century, conflict between Europeans and Native Americans was rampant and constant. As more and more Europeans migrated to America, violence became increasingly consistent. This seemingly institutionalized pattern of conflict begs a question: Was conflict between Europeans and Native Americans inevitable? Kevin Kenny and Cynthia J. Van Zandt take opposing sides on the issue. Kevin Kenny asserts that William Penn’s vision for cordial relations with local Native Americans was destined for failure due to European colonists’ demands for privately owned land.

    Read More

  • The Archivray Moment Essay

    801 Words  | 4 Pages

    The focal point of the meeting was to negotiate a peace treaty between the Americans and Indians that would give the Creeks the land that was already theirs; It also served to end the gruesome war from the South-west borderline. The treaty was the first treaty between Americans and indians that did not happen on indian controlled soil. The Treaty of New York was signed in 1790; there was a failed treaty attempt between the U.S and Creeks at "Rock Landing, Georgia", in 1789. It was a 3 week negotiation that seemed to have never happened; it was almost completely unrecorded except for the final declarations. McGillivray expressed his gripes in a letter that was sent to the U.S commissioners.

    Read More

  • The Numbered Treaties Happens Between The Canadian Government And First Nations

    473 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Aboriginals thought of the treaties as a mean to trade, not to own things. Another major issue and challenge with the numbered treaties were the fact that that there were many verbal promises made to the First Nations that didn't actually happen. These promises are called outside promises and were promises that weren’t actually written on the treaties. Namely, in treaties 1 and 2 First Nations said that the government would aid them in farming

    Read More

  • Treaty Of New Echota Essay

    1115 Words  | 5 Pages

    The United States federal government tried to resolve its bond with many different Native tribes by treaties. The treaties were formal agreements between the United States government and the Native Americans. Treaties were made by the executive branch on behalf of the president and then ratified by the United States Senate. The treaties made it where Native American Indians would give up their rights to hunt and live on huge sections of land that they had inhabited in exchange for trade goods, houses, and assurances that no further demands would be made in the said treaties (NebraskaStudies. Org).

    Read More

More about European Treaties Vs First Nations Essay

Open Document