Evidence Based Practice In Social Work

Practice based on empirical knowledge helps reduce bias, enables workers to study interpretations, perspectives or alternative solutions, and makes social workers more accountable for their decisions JD Hudson (1997). The dialogue between theory and practice In the past and present, there is hesitation among practitioners in social work to adapt theory and research because they feel that the reference to theory is the loss of connection with reality when practicing social work. In order for the social worker to be an effective practitioner, man must have a sound theoretical basis and this is not easy to achieve.

Likewise, the best treatment should not refer to local treatment standards, but the best standards available to maximize the beneficence and justice applied to participants already undertaking the burden of participating in a clinical trial. Unfortunately, ethical principles can sometimes be neglected due to competition in the field and the increase of regulations. This has resulted in some ethically questionable trials based in third world countries that violate justice, autonomy, and beneficence to obtain faster results. Harold Varmus and David Satcher’s perspective on what standards and guidelines should be implemented in clinical trials in third world countries differs from that of Angell’s arguments. They make the argument that compared to other approaches, a placebo is the most justified way to obtain clear and rapid results from clinical trials regardless of what treatments may currently be available.

However, if we are not quite sure either way what the best way forward would be then the decision maker will be more likely to persuade persons to change their mind towards their idea (William L Benoit, 1999). In the social judgement theory, people are likely to be persuaded strongly by messages which are at a reasonably moderate distance from the person’s latitude and attitude (Siero, F.W et al., 1993). Social judgement theory uses the power of persuasion to influence another person’s decision depending on where the anchor point lies. Decision making using the social justice theory can be influenced by moving ones ‘anchor point’ along the

“Helpers forget at times that their labels are interpretations rather than understandings of their clients”, (Egan, 2014, p. 78). Egan suggests that the counsellor ensures the client, rather than theories and models, remains the focus of their attention. Some therapists may have a tendency to focus on asking informational questions and focusing on facts, rather than gaining an understanding of the client as a person. In order to move away from this, Egan (2014) suggests that counsellors concentrate on clients contextually with a focus on key themes and messages being voiced. The role of sympathy in human relationships is valuable; however in the therapeutic context it is misplaced.

Under the moral theory of act utilitarianism, I will argue that the elements that define it as a moral theory, do not always hold up as a strong theory in its totality when we critically analyse it. I will also point out a few hypothetical situations and possible consequences when implementation of act utilitarianism is followed through. The consequences will be proven to have the potential to undo the utility of happiness for our loved family members, in order to care for strangers we do not have a connection with, which in my opinion is highly immoral. According to lecture notes ( Weijers & Munn 2016)

Linklater’s view is that knowledge can be the basis for ‘unsatisfactory social arrangements’ (Linklater in Smith, Booth, and Zalewski, 1996, p.279), so, through the assessment of this knowledge, the roles can be reversed (so to say), and intellect and insight can be used to advance society. While this idea seems to lack a clear plan of action and leaves us wondering how exactly one would go about nurturing such ideas, it is still an important conversation point in Critical Theory discourse. A final Critical Theorist examined in terms of what they contributed to the conversation on Critical Theory is Robert Cox.

Firstly, my evidence specifies that there is a definite connotation between accounting conservatism and cultural conservatism. For example, culturally conservative bosses tend to make more current accountingselections. That will not be clear, and we cannot determine the reasons. My consequences are educational in that they document a relationship between the two types of conservatism. But they do not tell us which factor of cultural conservatism such as public image, security, or religion is mainly participating in the documented connotation.

Subjective exploration is portrayed by its points, which identify with seeing some part of social life, and its techniques which (as a rule) create words, as opposed to numbers, as information for investigation. The points and routines for subjective exploration can appear to be loose. Basic reactions include: tests are little and not so much illustrative of the more extensive populace, so it is hard to know how far we can sum up the outcomes; the discoveries need meticulousness; it is hard to tell how far the discoveries are one-sided by the specialist's own sentiments. The quality of subjective examination is its capacity to give complex text based portrayals of how Individuals encounter a given examination issue.

Culturally competent service providers are aware of how their own cultural backgrounds, experiences, attitudes, values, and biases influence psychological processes. Although cultural competence is presented as a progressive and positive force for the challenge racism and discrimination There are a few obstacles that make it difficult to implement and in fact, achieved for the social worker and employers. Critique of cultural competence Critiqued that cultural competence for being unreachable. Critiqued that Could be privileging group characteristics over individuality – opens for stereotyping.

She thinks administrators need to be able to express compassion and empathy in their job. Her hopes and predictions for social work organizations blend together. Kristin predicts that social work organizations will have to be careful with the expectations they have for social workers and people in the organizations. She clarified this by needing to stress the difference between triggered and uncomfortable. Feeling uncomfortable is part of the work in a social work organization, as we will frequently run into things that make us uncomfortable, but we need to do them anyway.

Numbers, statistics, and names will not affect a general audience in the same sense it would a scholarly one, just as emotions or logic might not leave as lasting of an impression on scholars as it would the general public. This distinction does not make one better or worse in an umbrella definition; alternatively, it is relative to the audience the topic and writer’s intended audience. In reference to both Bell Hooks’s and Rose and Baumgartner’s writing, the former more effectively targets an audience lacking the vocabulary a scholar would have. In that perspective, Bell Hooks writes appropriately, as poverty and the judgment associated with the less privileged is an emotional issue (Hooks). With that, an emotional approach seems the most fitting, regardless of audience.

Evidence-based practice is the Institute of Medicine’s (IOM) third healthcare core competency that focuses on providing patient-centered care (Finkelman & Kenner, 2016). The definition according to the IOM is the combination of the highest research, clinical ability, and patient benefit while providing care to each individual patient (Greiner & Knebel, 2003). By implementing an evidence-based practice, healthcare providers can provide the best practice while abstaining from the “underuse, misuse, and overuse of care” (Greiner & Knebel, 2003, p. 56). Studies have shown evidence-based practice encourages improved healthcare quality, enhanced health results, and decreased care and costs (Melnyk, Gallagher-Ford, Long, & Fineout-Overholt, 2014). Components of Evidence-Based Practice

The past two decades have seen a shift in policing practices, in many countries policing has transformed from a reactive force into a proactive force (Fabricant, 2012; Lum, 2009). The shift from a reactive force to a proactive force occurred in response to the rising levels of crime which came with the development of the modern world (Fabricant, 2012). The establishment of the non-discretionary approach of zero-tolerance policing hoped to see a decrease in crimes committed and recidivism (Innes, 1999; Palmer, 2012). The somewhat fundamentally oppressive regime poses a plethora of benefits and negative outcomes, many of which are influenced by a variety of social factors (Burke, 1998).

Research Analyzing in depth material on the effects that childhood trauma has on the social development of adults concluded alarming statistics. According to Mental Health Connection of Tarrant County Trauma Statistics, throughout the average person's lifetime, 60% of adult report having a family, sexual, or some form of a traumatic childhood event occur (2012). That is a potential indicator that about 60% of adults that could suffer from traumatic childhood events that affect their social development. According to Epidemiology of Traumatic Experiences in Childhood by Zachary W. Adams and Benjamin E. Saunders, about 28% of children before the age of 4 year old have witnessed or experienced a traumatic event (2015).