Ever since Darwin published his theory of Evolution by Natural Selection, the idea of human evolution has been difficult for many people to accept. What is it about evolution by natural selection that many people find so unacceptable?
Leon Festinger once said, “A man with a conviction is a hard man to change. Tell him you disagree and he turns away. Show him facts or figures and he questions you sources. Appeal to logic and he fails to see you point“. This quote gives us the direction toward understanding why some people find it hard, or to some extend unacceptable when scientific facts are presented to them, in our case, evolution by natural selection. Charles Darwin published a book named „On the origin of species“ in 1859 where he introduced a scientific theory, giving an answer to the diversity of life by means of natural selection. The theory suggests that organisms adapted to the environment tend to survive and produce more offspring, while the others go extinct. Some people debate the relevancy and accuracy of the theory
…show more content…
It is related with Biological Essentialism, which refers to the idea that “we are how me are” because our genetic “makeup” which is not subject of change impacted by environment changes. In other word, people diminish the idea that variety of species is a result of million year’s natural selection process by discrediting the evidences such as fossils. They seek for immediate answer to the questions like, “why monkeys does not turn into a humans”? Furthermore, for some people there is a lack of fossil records to show the “whole story” for this transformation in the past which they see it as the missing link. It is precisely this reason why many people simple cannot pursue the idea that changes or variety of species happen throughout a very long period of time and cannot be visible to us, as we only can physically witness a small fraction of the earth’s long
The Strange Case Of Dr Jekyll And Mr Hyde: Charles Darwin’s revolutionary idea of evolution sparked dramatic debate in the scientific and, most especially, religious communities, as well as inspiring a new wave of thought in the minds of the world. There was also plenty of controversy, particularly from the many believers of creationism during the Victorian Age. But by denying creationism with his own theories, Darwin “made room for strictly scientific explanations of all natural phenomena”, and as a result, initiated a “powerful intellectual and spiritual revolution” whose effects last to this day. Its profound impact meant that “nearly every field of social and cultural life was affected by the idea of evolution.” Darwin’s idea of natural
In addition, scientists use the homologous structure as evidence for evolution by using structures with different appearances and functions that derived from the same body parts in a common ancestor. Furthermore, natural selection is evidence for evolution because for example, when Darwin collected birds they were a closely related group of distinct species, but the different beak shapes were related to food gathering. Artificial selection is another piece of evidence for evolution in which operates by favoring individuals with certain phenotypic traits allowing them to reproduce and pass their genes to the next generation. Overall many biologists accepted Darwin’s theories but there are some objections such as how evolution is not demonstrated, no fossil intermediates, the intelligent design argument, evolution violating the second law of thermodynamics, proteins are too improbable, the irreducible complexity argument, and how natural selection does not imply
Due to the aforementioned factors, we are tempted to see the species of today as a monument of the theory of evolution, but it actually undercuts the facts of evolution. Furthermore, a number of misconceptions have erupted throughout the years for the sole reason of not having an appropriate explanation for the facts of the theory of evolution. We are forced to accept wrong notions for us to be able to fully understand the said
The theory of evolution allows a seemingly useless gene to survive over generations if it does not endanger the survival of organisms containing it, during which it may gradually become significant. Hence, the argument of irreducible complexity, which is the core argument of intelligent design, does not threaten the validity of the theory of evolution. In the end, creationists have failed
This argues that different species adapt to their environment through mutations and this can also explain how a species can gradually evolve. An organism does not evolve in its lifetime, because species evolve as whole through variations. Whether the variation is in color, structure, or a physical trait, they allow us to tell a species apart from others. An example of this can be seen through any species, but Charles Darwin took close interest in observing mockingbirds when he was visiting the Galapagos Islands. The mockingbirds had subtle differences or variations in their color.
Even more so, a variation comes from an original trait that adapts to become a new trait. The reason certain species can or cannot do something is based on this idea of use or disuse of a variation to
In summary, Fleeming Jenkin’s swamping argument is used to explain some notable critics of Darwin’s main principles of evolution: for in social sciences, any valid work needs a critic to ensure its
(Pg 75) This lead to the jury and the audience changing their actions and attitude towards “Darwin’s Theory of Evolution”. “ Though, they do not believe in the theory of evolution written in the book but they realise and understand the importance and value of the freedom to think.
Over the eras, many scientists have expressed concerns with Darwin's evolution theory and in "Was Darwin Wrong?" by David Quammen one can learn about the proof behind the theory of evolution. Many people do not believe in evolution due to an overall unawareness about the theory and religious upbringing. However, Quammen clarifies the truth behind evolution in his article. The article states five positions of evidence biogeography, embryology, morphology, paleontology, and the bacterial resistance to antibiotics discovered in humans.
The Cambrian explosion argues against Darwin’s theory of natural selection. It
He describes a study in which high school students are quizzed on their knowledge of evolution both before taking an introductory biology class, and then after being instructed on the material. The results were astonishing: the students became conceited in their comprehension of material. He describes this as more “misconceiving” the information rather than people purposely speaking with a bigger mouth than they can handle (whats the phrase or word you use when people have a bigger mouth than they can handle Overconfidence? Use thesaurus). This clearly and concisely supports his main argument because outline he outlines the feelings that people felt in order to make them overly sanguine about what they hold to be true on that topic.
To every story there are at least two sides; for any considered conclusion a fact must have a contradiction. Moreover, arguments follow in tow. Henry Drummond in Inherit the Wind by Jerome Lawrence and Robert E. Lee, displays the significance to Creationism and Darwinism in tandem. For either side to appropriately stay considered they must correlate with opposition.
Darwin was known for trying his best to present his scientific ideas in a way that it did not offend any believer or even in some perspectives were compatible with God. But his theory has been manipulated by both supporters and opposes of his work. Many people from a religious perspective believe that Darwin's theory undermines the fundamental beliefs that they hold, almost as an attack to their values (Dennett, 1995). Darwin's theory is that humans have evolved over time from other organisms, this is almost a slap-in-the-face for one of Christianity's core beliefs. Which is that God made us in His image when He made Adam and Eve; this means that above any other creature on the planet humanity has a special relationship with God.
For instance, evolution, at times, is not accepted by the absolutist and lead to intolerance. In this case, a new argument called “creation science” asserted that creation of the world can be supported using scientific evidence and therefore it “must be given equal time with evolutionary theory in high school biology texts and classes” (Barbour 83). The concept of creation science was later ruled as not legitimate science by Arkansas court (Parker, Schmidt 47). As seen through these two opposite realms of seeking truth, due to their reluctance to
Students are encouraged to form their own opinions and think open-mindedly based on the information presented to them, yet in the topic of life’s origins, they are no longer being afforded this opportunity because of the ban on the teaching of creationism. Creationism should be taught in schools because it does hold validity with several well-respected scientists and utilizes evidence observed by scientific studies to accurately support its main aspects. Critics often dismiss creationism as a hoax that lacks serious thought and accreditation from accomplished scientists. However, several well-respected scientists agree with the theory of creationism as a rational explanation for the